Do Twitter users change their behavior after exposure to misinformation? An in-depth analysis

被引:7
作者
Wang, Yichen [1 ]
Han, Richard [1 ]
Lehman, Tamara Silbergleit [1 ,2 ]
Lv, Qin [1 ]
Mishra, Shivakant [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Comp Sci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Dept Elect Comp & Energy Engn, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
Misinformation; Fake news; Twitter; User behavior;
D O I
10.1007/s13278-022-00992-8
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Social media platforms have been exploited to disseminate misinformation in recent years. The widespread online misinformation has been shown to affect users' beliefs and is connected to social impact such as polarization. In this work, we focus on misinformation's impact on specific user behavior and aim to understand whether general Twitter users changed their behavior after being exposed to misinformation. We compare the before- and after-exposure behaviors of Twitter users to determine whether they changed their tweeting frequency, tweets sentiment, usage of specific types of words, and the ratio of liberal/conservative media URLs they shared. Our results show that users overall exhibited statistically significant changes in behavior across some of these metrics. Through language distance analysis, we show that exposed users were already different from baseline users before the exposure. We also study the characteristics of several specific user groups, which include liberal/conservative leaning groups and multi-exposure groups. Furthermore, we study whether the users' behavior changes after exposure to misinformation tweets vary based on their follower count or the follower count of the tweet authors. Finally, we examine potential bots' behaviors and find they are similar to that of normal users.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Alba D, 2020, FACEB MIS POP NOW 20
[2]   Assessing Sentiment of the Expressed Stance on Social Media [J].
Aldayel, Abeer ;
Magdy, Walid .
SOCIAL INFORMATICS, SOCINFO 2019, 2019, 11864 :277-286
[3]  
Althoff Tim, 2016, Trans Assoc Comput Linguist, V4, P463
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, P 50 ANN M ASS COMP
[5]   Discriminative Models for Predicting Deception Strategies [J].
Appling, Scott ;
Briscoe, Erica ;
Hutto, C. J. .
WWW'15 COMPANION: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 24TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WORLD WIDE WEB, 2015, :947-952
[6]  
Benevenuto F, 2009, IMC'09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2009 ACM SIGCOMM INTERNET MEASUREMENT CONFERENCE, P49
[7]   Science vs Conspiracy: Collective Narratives in the Age of Misinformation [J].
Bessi, Alessandro ;
Coletto, Mauro ;
Davidescu, George Alexandru ;
Scala, Antonio ;
Caldarelli, Guido ;
Quattrociocchi, Walter .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (02)
[8]  
Bianco R., 2021, Study finds misinformation still driving vaccine hesitancyJun
[9]  
Boyd R. L., 2022, The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC22, DOI DOI 10.13140/RG.2.2.23890.43205
[10]   Computational Fact Checking from Knowledge Networks [J].
Ciampaglia, Giovanni Luca ;
Shiralkar, Prashant ;
Rocha, Luis M. ;
Bollen, Johan ;
Menczer, Filippo ;
Flammini, Alessandro .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (06)