Local Perceptions of Ecosystem Services Across Multiple Ecosystem Types in Spain

被引:34
|
作者
Garcia-Llorente, Marina [1 ,2 ]
J. Castro, Antonio [3 ,4 ]
Quintas-Soriano, Cristina [2 ,5 ]
Oteros-Rozas, Elisa [2 ,6 ]
Iniesta-Arandia, Irene [2 ,7 ]
Gonzalez, Jose A. [1 ]
Garcia del Amo, David [7 ]
Hernandez-Arroyo, Marta [8 ]
Casado-Arzuaga, Izaskun [9 ,10 ]
Palomo, Ignacio [11 ,12 ]
Gomez-Baggethun, Erik [13 ,14 ]
Onaindia, Miren [10 ]
Montes, Carlos [1 ]
Martin-Lopez, Berta [15 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Dept Ecol, Social Ecol Syst Lab, C Darwin 2, Madrid 28049, Spain
[2] FRACTAL Collect, San Remigio 2, Madrid 28022, Spain
[3] Univ Almeria, Dept Biol & Geol, Andalusian Ctr Assessment & Monitoring Global Cha, Almeria 04120, Spain
[4] Idaho State Univ, Dept Biol Sci, 921 South 8th Ave, Pocatello, ID 83209 USA
[5] Univ Kassel, Fac Organ Agr Sci, Steinstr 19, D-37213 Witzenhausen, Germany
[6] Univ Vic Cent Univ Catalonia UVic UCC, Chair Agroecol & Food Syst, C de la Laura,13, Vic 08500, Spain
[7] Univ Autonoma Barcelona UAB, Inst Environm Sci & Technol ICTA, Edifici Z ICTA ICP,Carrer Columnes S-N,Campus UAB, Barcelona 08193, Spain
[8] Asociac Ecol & Educ Ciudad SostenibleTransitando, C Cavanilles 10,5D, Madrid 28007, Spain
[9] Dept Desarrollo Econ Sostenibilidad & Medio Ambie, C Donostia San Sebastian,1, Vitoria 01010, Alava, Spain
[10] Univ Basque Country UPV EHU, Dept Plant Biol & Ecol, POB 644, Bilbao 48080, Spain
[11] Basque Ctr Climate Change BC3, Alameda Donaindiae Urquijo 4, Bilbao 48008, Spain
[12] Univ Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Lab Ecol Alpine, F-38000 Grenoble, France
[13] Norwegian Univ Life Sci NMBU, Dept Int Environm & Dev Studies Noragr, N-1432 As, Norway
[14] Norwegian Inst Nat Res NINA, Gaustadalleen 21, N-0349 Oslo, Norway
[15] Leuphana Univ, Fac Sustainabil, Univ Allee 1, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany
关键词
ecosystem service diversity; governance; local communities; place-based approach; socio-cultural valuation; social perception; LAND-USE CHANGE; TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE; SOCIOCULTURAL VALUATION; URBAN GARDENS; TRADE-OFFS; LANDSCAPES; CONSERVATION; VALUES; DONANA; BIODIVERSITY;
D O I
10.3390/land9090330
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Combining socio-cultural valuations of ecosystem services with ecological and monetary assessments is critical to informing decision making with an integrative and multi-pronged approach. This study examined differences in the perceptions of ecosystem service supply and diversity across eight major ecosystem types in Spain and scrutinized the social and ecological factors shaping these perceptions. First, we implemented 1932 face-to-face questionnaires among local inhabitants to assess perceptions of ecosystem service supply. Second, we created an ecosystem service diversity index to measure the perceived diversity of services considering agroecosystems, Mediterranean mountains, arid systems, two aquatic continental systems, coastal ecosystems and two urban ecosystems. Finally, we examined the influence of biophysical, socio-demographic and institutional factors in shaping ecosystem service perceptions. Overall, cultural services were the most widely perceived, followed by provisioning and regulating services. Provisioning services were most strongly associated with agroecosystems, mountains and coastal systems, whereas cultural services were associated with urban ecosystems and regulating services were specifically linked with agroecosystems, mountains and urban recreational areas. The highest service diversity index values corresponded to agroecosystems, mountains and wetlands. Our results also showed that socio-demographic factors, such as place of origin (urban vs. rural) and educational level, as well as institutional factors, such as management and access regimes, shaped the perception of ecosystem services.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Stakeholder Perceptions of Coastal Habitat Ecosystem Services
    Lauren Hutchison
    Paul Montagna
    Dave Yoskowitz
    Damion Scholz
    Jace Tunnell
    Estuaries and Coasts, 2015, 38 : 67 - 80
  • [22] Exploring stakeholders' ecosystem services perceptions across Massachusetts Bays using deliberative valuation
    Lyon-Mackie, Jennifer
    Vella, Prassede
    DiBona, Pamela A.
    Shehab-Sehovic, Noora
    Roche, Samantha B.
    Kreiley, Allison I.
    Mavrommati, Georgia
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2023, 11
  • [23] An integrated biophysical and ecosystem approach as a base for ecosystem services analysis across regions
    Fridman, Dor
    Kissinger, Meidad
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2018, 31 : 242 - 254
  • [24] Assessment of ecosystem services in new perspective: A comprehensive ecosystem service index (CESI) as a proxy to integrate multiple ecosystem services
    Wu, Linlin
    Fan, Fenglei
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 138
  • [25] An assessment method of ecosystem services based on stakeholders perceptions: The Rapid Ecosystem Services Participatory Appraisal (RESPA)
    Rey-Valette, Helene
    Mathe, Syndhia
    Salles, Jean Michel
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2017, 28 : 311 - 319
  • [26] Ecosystem services: Multiple classifications or confusion?
    Wallace, Ken
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2008, 141 (02) : 353 - 354
  • [27] Multiple ecosystem services in a working landscape
    Eastburn, Danny J.
    O'Geen, Anthony T.
    Tate, Kenneth W.
    Roche, Leslie M.
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (03):
  • [28] Uncovering spatial patterns of ecosystem services and biodiversity through local communities' preferences and perceptions
    Pingarroni, Aline
    Castro, Antonio J.
    Gambi, Marcos
    Bongers, Frans
    Kolb, Melanie
    Garcia-Frapolli, Eduardo
    Balvanera, Patricia
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2022, 56
  • [29] Effectively enhancing perceptions of cultural ecosystem services: A case study of a karst cultural ecosystem
    Nie, Xin
    Wang, Qiaoling
    Wu, Jianxian
    Wang, Han
    Chen, Zhoupeng
    He, Jiaxin
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 315
  • [30] Building African Ecosystem Research Network for Sustaining Local Ecosystem Goods and Services
    Armand Sedami Igor YEVIDE
    WU Bingfang
    YU Xiubo
    LI Xiaosong
    LIU Yu
    LIU Jian
    Chinese Geographical Science , 2015, (04) : 414 - 425