Systematic review of the effect of training interventions on the skills of health professionals in promoting health behaviour, with meta-analysis of subsequent effects on patient health behaviours

被引:20
作者
Hatfield, Thomas G. [1 ]
Withers, Thomas M. [1 ]
Greaves, Colin J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Sch Sport Exercise & Rehabil Sci, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
关键词
Healthcare professional; Training; Delivery quality; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; CENTERED CARE; RECOMMENDATIONS; COMMUNICATION; RELIABILITY; PREVENTION; PHYSICIANS; ADHERENCE; KNOWLEDGE; EVALUATE;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-020-05420-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundWe aimed to identify, synthesise and evaluate randomised control trial evidence on the effects of healthcare professional training on the delivery quality of health behaviour change interventions and, subsequently, on patient health behaviours.MethodsSystematic review with narrative synthesis of effects on delivery quality and meta-analysis of health behaviour outcomes. We searched: Medline, EMBASE, PsychInfo, AMED, CINAHL Plus and the Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials up to March 2019. Studies were included if they were in English and included intervention delivery quality as an outcome. The systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (registration: CRD42019124502).ResultsTwelve-studies were identified as suitable for inclusion. All studies were judged as being high risk of bias with respect to training quality outcomes. However with respect to behavioural outcomes, only two of the six studies included in the meta-analysis had a high risk and four had some concerns. Educational elements (e.g. presentations) were used in all studies and nine included additional practical learning tasks. In eight studies reporting delivery quality, 54% of healthcare professional communication outcomes and 55% of content delivery outcomes improved in the intervention arm compared to controls. Training that included both educational and practical elements tended to be more effective. Meta-analysis of patient health behavioural outcomes in six-studies found significant improvements (Standardised mean difference (SMD): 0.20, 95% confidence interval: 0.11 to 0.28, P <0.0001, I-2 =0%). No significant difference was found between short (<less than or equal to>6-months) and long-term (>6-months) outcomes (SMD: 0.25 vs 0.15; P =0.31).ConclusionsDelivery quality of health behaviour change interventions appears to improve following training and consequently to improve health behaviours. Future studies should develop more concise /integrated measures of delivery quality and develop optimal methods of training delivery.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [21] The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decision-making tasks
    Elwyn, G
    Hutchings, H
    Edwards, A
    Rapport, F
    Wensing, M
    Cheung, WY
    Grol, R
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2005, 8 (01) : 34 - 42
  • [22] Primer: Strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis
    Finckh A.
    Tramèr M.R.
    [J]. Nature Clinical Practice Rheumatology, 2008, 4 (3): : 146 - 152
  • [23] A randomized trial to evaluate primary care clinician training to use the Teachable Moment Communication Process for smoking cessation counseling
    Flocke, Susan A.
    Step, Mary M.
    Antognoli, Elizabeth
    Lawson, Peter J.
    Smith, Samantha
    Jackson, Brigid
    Krejci, Sue
    Parran, Theodore
    Marsh, Sybil
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 69 : 267 - 273
  • [24] Identifying content-based and relational techniques to change behaviour in motivational interviewing
    Hardcastle, Sarah J.
    Fortier, Michelle
    Blake, Nicola
    Hagger, Martin S.
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2017, 11 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [25] Higgins J., 2008, COCHRANE COLLABORATI, DOI DOI 10.1002/
  • [26] Evaluation of Online Learning Modules for Improving Physical Activity Counseling Skills, Practices, and Knowledge of Oncology Nurses
    Karvinen, Kristina H.
    Balneaves, Lynda G.
    Courneya, Kerry S.
    Perry, Beth
    Truant, Tracy
    Vallance, Jeff
    [J]. ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2017, 44 (06) : 729 - 738
  • [27] Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research
    Kimberlin, Carole L.
    Winterstein, Almut G.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2008, 65 (23) : 2276 - 2284
  • [28] Randomised controlled trial of patient centred care of diabetes in general practice: impact on current wellbeing and future disease risk
    Kinmonth, AL
    Woodcock, A
    Griffin, S
    Spiegal, N
    Campbell, MJ
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 317 (7167): : 1202 - 1208
  • [29] A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: an Intervention Mapping approach
    Kok, Gerjo
    Gottlieb, Nell H.
    Peters, Gjalt-Jorn Y.
    Mullen, Patricia Dolan
    Parcel, Guy S.
    Ruiter, Robert A. C.
    Fernandez, Maria E.
    Markham, Christine
    Bartholomew, L. Kay
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2016, 10 (03) : 297 - 312
  • [30] Assessment of fidelity in individual level behaviour change interventions promoting physical activity among adults: a systematic review
    Lambert, Jeffrey D.
    Greaves, Colin J.
    Farrand, Paul
    Cross, Rosina
    Haase, Anne M.
    Taylor, Adrian H.
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 17