Antidepressant response and well-being in pre-, peri- and postmenopausal women with major depressive disorder treated with fluoxetine

被引:17
作者
Cassano, P
Soares, CN
Cusin, C
Mascarini, A
Cohen, LS
Fava, M
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Depress Clin & Res Program, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Perinatal & Reprod Psychiat Clin Res Program, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Univ Milan, Monza, Italy
关键词
depression; fluoxetine; menopause; well-being;
D O I
10.1159/000087783
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: We assessed the impact of menopausal status on treatment response and well-being in a cohort of outpatient women with major depressive disorder (DSM-III-R criteria), who received treatment with fluoxetine (20 mg/ day for 8 weeks). Methods: Menopausal status was defined based on age, presence of menstrual irregularity or amenorrhea and vasomotor symptoms. Remission and response of depression were defined as a 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-17) score <= 7 and a HAM-D-17 decrease >= 50%, respectively. Well-being was assessed by self- rating with the Symptom Questionnaire. Remitters were followed up for 28 additional weeks. Results: No differences in rates of response and remission as well as in levels of well-being were observed among pre- ( n = 121), peri- ( n = 28) and postmenopausal ( n = 35) women at the endpoint of the acute phase, even after adjustment for baseline depression severity. Residual symptoms, however, were significantly more common in postmenopausal women, except for the continuation phase endpoint. Differences in residual symptoms during the acute phase subsided after adjustment for baseline depression severity. Conclusions: Overall, menopausal status did not significantly affect the response to fluoxetine treatment and the degree of posttreatment well- being among major depressive disorder patients. Copyright (c) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 365
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Fluoxetine efficacy in menopausal women with and without estrogen replacement [J].
Amsterdam, J ;
Garcia-España, F ;
Fawcett, J ;
Quitkin, F ;
Reimherr, F ;
Rosenbaum, J ;
Beasley, C .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 1999, 55 (01) :11-17
[2]  
Aubuchon M, 2004, GERIATRICS, V59, P22
[3]  
Cassano P, 2004, Arch Womens Ment Health, V7, P167
[4]  
ENTSUAH AR, 2001, AM COLL NEUR PHARM A
[5]   Major depressive subtypes and treatment response [J].
Fava, M ;
Uebelacker, LA ;
Alpert, JE ;
Nierenberg, AA ;
Pava, JA ;
Rosenbaum, JF .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1997, 42 (07) :568-576
[6]  
KELLNER R, 1987, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V48, P268
[7]   Gender differences in treatment response to sertraline versus imipramine in chronic depression [J].
Kornstein, SG ;
Schatzberg, AF ;
Thase, ME ;
Yonkers, KA ;
McCullough, JP ;
Keitner, GI ;
Gelenberg, AJ ;
Davis, SM ;
Harrison, WM ;
Keller, MB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 157 (09) :1445-1452
[8]   Gender differences in the efficacy of fluoxetine and maprotiline in depressed patients:: a double-blind trial of antidepressants with serotonergic or norepinephrinergic reuptake inhibition profile [J].
Martényi, F ;
Dossenbach, M ;
Mraz, K ;
Metcalfe, S .
EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 11 (03) :227-232
[9]   Sensitivity of the six-item Hamilton depression rating scale [J].
OSullivan, RL ;
Fava, M ;
Agustin, C ;
Baer, L ;
Rosenbaum, JF .
ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA, 1997, 95 (05) :379-384
[10]   Effects of adding cognitive therapy to fluoxetine dose increase on risk of relapse and residual depressive symptoms in continuation treatment of major depressive disorder [J].
Perlis, RH ;
Nierenberg, AA ;
Alpert, JE ;
Pava, J ;
Matthews, JD ;
Buchin, J ;
Sickinger, AH ;
Fava, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 22 (05) :474-480