Spinal cord stimulation for chronic refractory pain: Long-term effectiveness and safety data from a multicentre registry

被引:21
作者
Brinzeu, Andrei [1 ]
Cuny, Emmanuel [2 ]
Fontaine, Denys [3 ,4 ]
Mertens, Patrick [1 ]
Luyet, Pierre-Philippe [5 ]
Van den Abeele, Carine [5 ]
Djian, Marie-Christine [6 ,7 ]
Le Borgne, Jean-Marie
Palfi, Stephane
Sol, Jean-Christophe
Fowo, Sylvain
Desenclos, Christine
Gadan, Roberto
Nizar, Suleiman
Simon, Emile
Barat, Jean-Luc
Blond, Serge
Buisset, Nadia
Bougeard, Renaud
Borius, Pierre-Yves
Leveque, Marc
Cistac, Christian
Bouche, Benedicte
Hoffmann, Holger
Derrey, Stephane
Louazon-Busnel, Celine
Roy, Denis
Pellat, Jean-Michel
Schoch, Jean-Pierre
Diaz, Philippe
Phong Dam Hieu
Laporte, Alain
Dupont, Arnaud
Rakover, Jean-Patrick
Gradischnig, Marina
Sinardet, Denis
Hullen, Christian
Polo, Gustavo
La Framboise, David
机构
[1] Univ Lyon, Serv Neurochirurg, Hop Neurol Pierre Wertheimer, Hosp Civils LYON, Lyon, France
[2] CHU Bordeaux, Serv Neurochirurg, Bordeaux, France
[3] Univ Cote dAzur, Dept Neurosurg, CHU Nice, Nice, France
[4] Univ Cote dAzur, FHU INOVPAIN, CHU Nice, Nice, France
[5] Medtron Int, Tolochenaz, Switzerland
[6] Hop Foch, Dept Anesthesie, Suresnes, France
[7] Hop Foch, Unite Neuromodulat, Suresnes, France
关键词
BACK SURGERY SYNDROME; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; FOLLOW-UP; NEUROSTIMULATION; RELIEF;
D O I
10.1002/ejp.1355
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established therapy for refractory neuropathic pain. To ascertain the balance between treatment benefits and risks, the French National Authority for Health requested a post-market registry for real-world evaluation of the long-term effectiveness and safety of the therapy. Methods A total of 402 patients undergoing implantation with a Medtronic SCS device as either a primo-implant (n = 264) or replacement implant (n = 138) were enrolled across 28 representative sites in France. Outcome measures at 2 years included pain intensity, satisfaction with treatment, improvement of pain relief and daily life activity, willingness to undergo the treatment again and use of pain treatments. A patient was considered a responder if, compared to baseline, predominant pain reduction was >= 50%. Results At the 2-year follow-up visit, predominant pain intensity for primo-implant patients had decreased from baseline (p < 0.001), with responder rates of 55%, 36% and 67% for the lower limbs, back and upper limbs, respectively. Most patients acknowledged an improvement in pain relief (89%) and daily life activity (82%) were satisfied with treatment (91%) and willing to undergo the treatment again (93%). A significant decrease (p < 0.01) in the proportion of patients receiving pain treatment was observed for all drug and non-drug treatments. Reported adverse events were in line with the literature. Pain intensity at 2 years was comparable for patients in the replacement group, supporting the long-term stability and effectiveness of SCS. Conclusion Real-world evaluation of the use of spinal cord stimulation under the recommendations of the French Health Authority shows that two years after the first implantation of an SCS device close to 60% of the patients retain a significant pain reduction and 74% show improvement in pain scores [of at least 30%] with significant decreases in drug and non-drug pain treatments. Significance This observational, prospective study in a real-life setting followed a large cohort of patients suffering from chronic pain and implanted with SCS devices in France. The study assessed the long-term effectiveness and safety of SCS therapy in a representative sample of implanting sites in France.
引用
收藏
页码:1031 / 1044
页数:14
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   The specific disease burden of neuropathic pain: Results of a French nationwide survey [J].
Attal, Nadine ;
Lanteri-Minet, Michel ;
Laurent, Bernard ;
Fermanian, Jacques ;
Bouhassira, Didier .
PAIN, 2011, 152 (12) :2836-2843
[2]   Cost-benefit evaluation of spinal cord stimulation treatment for failed-back surgery syndrome patients [J].
Blond, S ;
Buisset, N ;
Hieu, PD ;
Nguyen, JP ;
Lazorthes, Y ;
Cantagrel, N ;
Laugner, B ;
Bellow, F ;
Djian, MC ;
Husson, JL ;
Lapierre, F ;
Blanc, JL .
NEUROCHIRURGIE, 2004, 50 (04) :443-453
[3]   Prevalence of chronic pain with neuropathic characteristics in the general population [J].
Bouhassira, Didier ;
Lanteri-Minet, Michel ;
Attal, Nadine ;
Laurent, Bernard ;
Touboul, Chantal .
PAIN, 2008, 136 (03) :380-387
[4]  
Cochran WG., 1963, Sampling techniques
[5]   Neuropathic pain [J].
Colloca, Luana ;
Ludman, Taylor ;
Bouhassira, Didier ;
Baron, Ralf ;
Dickenson, AnthonyH. ;
Yarnitsky, David ;
Freeman, Roy ;
Truini, Andrea ;
Attal, Nadine ;
Finnerup, Nanna B. ;
Eccleston, Christopher ;
Kalso, Eija ;
Bennett, David L. ;
Dworkin, RobertH. ;
Raja, Srinivasa N. .
NATURE REVIEWS DISEASE PRIMERS, 2017, 3
[6]   EAN guidelines on central neurostimulation therapy in chronic pain conditions [J].
Cruccu, G. ;
Garcia-Larrea, L. ;
Hansson, P. ;
Keindl, M. ;
Lefaucheur, J. -P. ;
Paulus, W. ;
Taylor, R. ;
Tronnier, V. ;
Truini, A. ;
Attal, N. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2016, 23 (10) :1489-1499
[7]   Neurostimulation for the Treatment of Axial Back Pain: A Review of Mechanisms, Techniques, Outcomes, and Future Advances [J].
Deer, Timothy ;
Pope, Jason ;
Hayek, Salim ;
Narouze, Samer ;
Patil, Parag ;
Foreman, Robert ;
Sharan, Ashwini ;
Levy, Robert .
NEUROMODULATION, 2014, 17 :52-68
[8]   A standard database format for clinical trials of pain treatments: An ACTTION-CDISC initiative [J].
Dworkin, Robert H. ;
Allen, Robert ;
Kopko, Stephen ;
Lu, Yun ;
Turk, Dennis C. ;
Burke, Laurie B. ;
Desjardins, Paul ;
Etropolski, Mila ;
Hewitt, David J. ;
Jayawardena, Shyamalie ;
Lin, Allison H. ;
Malamut, Richard ;
Michel, Denis ;
Ottinger, James ;
Peloso, Paul ;
Pucino, Frank ;
Rappaport, Bob A. ;
Skljarevski, Vladimir ;
St Peter, David ;
Timinski, Susan ;
West, Christine R. ;
Wilson, Hilary D. .
PAIN, 2013, 154 (01) :11-14
[9]   Complications of Spinal Cord Stimulation and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Techniques: A Review of the Literature [J].
Eldabe, Sam ;
Buchser, Eric ;
Duarte, Rui V. .
PAIN MEDICINE, 2016, 17 (02) :325-336
[10]   Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale [J].
Farrar, JT ;
Young, JP ;
LaMoreaux, L ;
Werth, JL ;
Poole, RM .
PAIN, 2001, 94 (02) :149-158