Individual differences in face identification postdict eyewitness accuracy

被引:35
作者
Bindemann, Markus [1 ]
Brown, Chennelle [2 ]
Koyas, Tiffany [2 ]
Russ, Andrew [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kent, Sch Psychol, Canterbury CT2 7NP, Kent, England
[2] Univ Essex, Dept Psychol, Colchester CO4 3SQ, Essex, England
关键词
Eyewitness identification; Face perception; Individual differences; Postdictors; DECISION-TIMES; RECOGNITION; CONFIDENCE; MEMORY; PERFORMANCE; VIDEO; METAANALYSIS; FAMILIARITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.02.001
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Eyewitnesses frequently mistake innocent suspects for the culprits of an observed crime, and such misidentifications have caused the wrongful convictions of many innocent people. This study attempted to establish the accuracy of individual eyewitnesses by assessing their ability to process unfamiliar faces. Observers viewed a staged crime and later tried to select the culprit from an identity lineup. This was followed by a face test that provides a laboratory analogue to lineup identifications. We found that this face test could determine the reliability of individual witnesses when a positive eyewitness identification had been made. Importantly, this was possible based on the specific response that a witness had made and without prior knowledge of whether the culprit was actually present in the lineup. These findings demonstrate that individual differences in face processing provide a potential instrument for postdicting eyewitness accuracy and for preventing miscarriages of justice. (C) 2012 Society of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 103
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   50 YEARS OF MEMORY FOR NAMES AND FACES - CROSS-SECTIONAL APPROACH [J].
BAHRICK, HP ;
BAHRICK, PO ;
WITTLINGER, RP .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1975, 104 (01) :54-75
[2]  
Benton A., 1994, CONTRIBUTIONS NEUROP
[3]   Distinguishing accurate from inaccurate eyewitness identifications with an optional deadline procedure [J].
Brewer, Neil ;
Weber, Nathan ;
Clark, Abigail ;
Wells, Gary L. .
PSYCHOLOGY CRIME & LAW, 2008, 14 (05) :397-414
[4]   Verification of face identities from images captured on video [J].
Bruce, V ;
Henderson, Z ;
Greenwood, K ;
Hancock, PJB ;
Burton, AM ;
Miller, P .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 1999, 5 (04) :339-360
[5]  
Bruce V., 1998, In the eye of the beholder: The science of face perception
[6]   The Glasgow Face Matching Test [J].
Burton, A. Mike ;
White, David ;
McNeill, Allan .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2010, 42 (01) :286-291
[7]   Face recognition in poor-quality video: Evidence from security surveillance [J].
Burton, AM ;
Wilson, S ;
Cowan, M ;
Bruce, V .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (03) :243-248
[8]  
Charman S. D., J APPL RES IN PRESS
[9]   Regularities in eyewitness identification [J].
Clark, Steven E. ;
Howell, Ryan T. ;
Davey, Sherrie L. .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2008, 32 (03) :187-218
[10]   JUROR DECISION-MAKING IN EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION CASES [J].
CUTLER, BL ;
PENROD, SD ;
STUVE, TE .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 1988, 12 (01) :41-55