Determining the Optimum Irrigation Schedule in Furrow Irrigated Cotton using Soil Moisture Sensors

被引:18
作者
Plumblee, Michael T. [1 ]
Dodd, Darrin M. [1 ]
Krutz, L. Jason [2 ]
Catchot, Angus L., Jr. [3 ]
Irby, J. Trenton [1 ]
Jenkins, Johnie N. [4 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Edisto Res & Educ Ctr, Blackville, SC 29817 USA
[2] Mississippi State Univ, Mississippi Water Resources Res Inst, Starkville, MS USA
[3] Mississippi State Univ, Dep Biochem Mol Biol Entomol & Plant Pathol, Starkville, MS USA
[4] USDA ARS, Starkville, MS USA
关键词
WATER REQUIREMENTS; YIELD; GROWTH;
D O I
10.2134/cftm2018.06.0047
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The Mississippi River Valley Alluvial Aquifer (MRVAA) is declining at a rapid rate due to withdrawal for agricultural irrigation. This research was conducted to develop a sensor-based irrigation threshold for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) that maximizes net returns and irrigation water use efficiency (IWUE). The effects of irrigation based on growth stage (full season, emergence to first bloom, first bloom to peak bloom, and peak bloom to first cracked boll) and irrigation threshold (non-irrigated, -50 kPa, -90 kPa, and -130 kPa) on cotton lint yield, net returns above irrigation costs, and IWUE were evaluated on a Leeper silty clay loam (fine, smectitic, nonacid, thermic Vertic Epiaquepts). Net returns above irrigation costs were $142/acre greater when the threshold was maintained at -90 kPa rather than -50 kPa (p < 0.0001). Maintaining the threshold at -90 kPa also increased IWUE at least 61% relative to the -50 and -130 kPa thresholds (p < 0.0001). Neither increasing nor decreasing the threshold as a function of growth stage improved yield relative to a season-long threshold of -90 kPa (p = 0.5460). Our data indicate that yield, net returns above irrigation costs, and IWUE are maximized by maintaining a season-long threshold of -90 kPa. Adoption of this technique could reduce agriculture withdrawal from the MRVAA and thus improve its sustainability.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Atwill R. L, 2016, P 2016 ANN M ASA CSS
[2]  
Bond J. A, 2017, PUB MISSISSIPPI STAT, V3171
[3]  
Bryant CJ, 2017, CROP FORAGE TURF MAN, V3, DOI 10.2134/cftm2017.04.0025
[4]  
Catchot A. L, 2017, PUB MISSISSIPPI STAT, V2471
[5]  
CONSTABLE GA, 1981, IRRIGATION SCI, V3, P17, DOI 10.1007/BF00251380
[6]   IRRIGATION SCHEDULING OF COTTON IN A CLIMATE WITH UNCERTAIN RAINFALL .1. CROP WATER REQUIREMENTS AND RESPONSE TO IRRIGATION [J].
CULL, PO ;
HEARN, AB ;
SMITH, RCG .
IRRIGATION SCIENCE, 1981, 2 (03) :127-140
[7]   Different drip irrigation regimes affect cotton yield, water use efficiency and fiber quality in western Turkey [J].
Dagdelen, N. ;
Basal, H. ;
Yilmaz, E. ;
Gurbuz, T. ;
Akcay, S. .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2009, 96 (01) :111-120
[8]   Impacts of crop insurance on water withdrawals for irrigation [J].
Deryugina, Tatyana ;
Konar, Megan .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2017, 110 :437-444
[9]  
Dodds D.M., 2017, 2017 Mid-South cotton defoliation guide
[10]  
Dodds D. M, 2017, INF B MISSISSIPPI AG, V507