Comparison of three larval bioassays to evaluate susceptibility of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus to amitraz

被引:9
作者
Bettin Santos, Tania Regina [1 ]
Klafke, Guilherme Marcondes [2 ]
Pappen, Felipe Geraldo [3 ]
Nizoli, Leandro Quintana [1 ]
Biegelmeyer, Patricia [4 ]
Rosa Farias, Nara Amelia [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Pelotas UFPel, Fac Vet, Dept Vet Prevent, Lab Doencas Parasitarias, BR-96010900 Capao Do Leao, RS, Brazil
[2] Fundacao Estadual Pesquisa Agr, Inst Pesquisas Vet Desiderio Finamor, Parasitol Lab, Eldorado Do Sul, RS, Brazil
[3] Inst Fed Catarinense IFC, Parasitol Lab, Concordia, SC, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Pelotas UFPel, Fac Agron Eliseu Maciel, Dept Zootecnia, Programa Posgrad Zootecnia, BR-96010900 Capao Do Leao, RS, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Pelotas UFPel, Inst Biol, Dept Microbiol & Parasitol, Parasitol Lab, BR-96010900 Capao Do Leao, RS, Brazil
来源
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE PARASITOLOGIA VETERINARIA | 2013年 / 22卷 / 04期
关键词
Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus; amitraz; bioassays; resistance diagnosis; GRANDE-DO-SUL; CATTLE TICK; ACARI IXODIDAE; RESISTANCE; BRAZIL; STATE; POPULATIONS; IVERMECTIN; DIAGNOSIS; SOUTHERN;
D O I
10.1590/S1984-29612013000400008
中图分类号
R38 [医学寄生虫学]; Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ; 100103 ;
摘要
Field samples of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus from the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, were assessed using the following methods: larval packet test (LPT), larval immersion test (LIT) and syringe immersion test (SIT). The following parameters were determined for each population and for the Mozo susceptible reference strain: lethal concentration for 50% (LC50) with its 95% confidence interval (95% CI), regression line slope and resistance ratio (RR). Using the LPT, only one population was susceptible to amitraz, presenting a RR of 1.9. Using the same technique, the other populations presented RRs of between 92.9 and 3445.8 and were considered resistant. The LC50 of the Mozo strain calculated using the LPT, LIT and SIT was 2.9, 27.3, and 52.7 mu g/mL, respectively. In general, a good fit to the probit statistical model was only achieved using the LPT. The results obtained in this study impair recommendations for using the LIT and SIT to diagnose amitraz resistance in R. (B.) microplus populations. Additional studies are required to improve the sensitivity of these tests in relation to the LPT.
引用
收藏
页码:495 / 501
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Acaricide resistance of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in State of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil [J].
Andreotti, Renato ;
Guerrero, Felix David ;
Soares, Mariana Aparecida ;
Barros, Jacqueline Cavalcante ;
Miller, Robert John ;
de Leon, Adalberto Perez .
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE PARASITOLOGIA VETERINARIA, 2011, 20 (02) :127-133
[2]   In vitro analysis of amitraz efficacy against Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Canestrini, 1887) populations of southern region of Rio Grande do Sul state [J].
Bettin dos Santos, Tania Regina ;
Pappen, Felipe Geraldes ;
da Rosa Farias, Nara Amelia ;
Vaz, Itabajara da Silva, Jr. .
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE PARASITOLOGIA VETERINARIA, 2009, 18 :54-57
[3]   In vitro evaluation of acaricides efficiency to bovine's ticks of Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil [J].
Camillo, Giovana ;
Vogel, Fernanda Flores ;
Sangioni, Luis Antonio ;
Cadore, Gustavo Cauduro ;
Ferrari, Roberta .
CIENCIA RURAL, 2009, 39 (02) :490-495
[4]  
Campos Júnior Dunezeu Alves, 2005, Cienc. Rural, V35, P1386, DOI 10.1590/S0103-84782005000600025
[5]   Diagnoses of fipronil resistance in Brazilian cattle ticks (Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus) using in vitro larval bioassays [J].
Castro-Janer, E. ;
Martins, J. R. ;
Mendes, M. C. ;
Namindome, A. ;
Klafke, G. M. ;
Schumaker, T. T. S. .
VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 2010, 173 (3-4) :300-306
[6]   GENETICS OF INSECT RESISTANCE TO CHEMICALS [J].
CROW, JF .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENTOMOLOGY, 1957, 2 :227-246
[7]   Proposal of an acaricide laboratory test larvae immersion of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus: evaluation with cypermethrin and amitraz [J].
De Souza, Antonio P. ;
Veiga, Luana Paula H. N. ;
Bellato, Valdomiro ;
Sartor, Amelia Aparecida ;
Cardoso, Cristina P. ;
Nunes, Ana Paula De O. .
REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE PARASITOLOGIA VETERINARIA, 2008, 17 (04) :242-245
[8]  
FAO, 2004, Resistance. Management and integrated parasite control in ruminants-Guidelines, Module 1. Ticks: Acaricide resistance: Diagnosis, management and prevention
[9]   Acaricids efficacy analysis on Boophilus microplus tick, in the last decade in the southern of Rio Grande do Sul [J].
Farias, Nara Amelia ;
Ruas, Jeronimo Lopes ;
Bettin dos Santos, Tania Regina .
CIENCIA RURAL, 2008, 38 (06) :1700-1704
[10]  
Finney DJ, 1980, PROBIT ANALYSIS