Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Using Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

被引:55
作者
Nerlekar, Nitesh [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ha, Francis J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Verma, Kunal P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bennett, Martin R. [4 ]
Cameron, James D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Meredith, Ian T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Brown, Adam J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Monash Cardiovasc Res Ctr, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[2] MonashHeart, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Hlth, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Cambridge, Div Cardiovasc Med, Cambridge, England
关键词
coronary angiography; coronary artery bypass; drug-eluting stent; meta-analysis; percutaneous coronary intervention; 5-YEAR OUTCOMES; DISEASE; SURGERY; REVASCULARIZATION; IMPLANTATION; ANGIOGRAPHY; MANAGEMENT; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004729
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background-Current guidelines suggest that coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) should be the preferred revascularization method for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. In light of evidence from recent randomized trials, we assessed whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using drug-eluting stents is as safe and effective as CABG for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease. Methods and Results-Digital databases and manual searches were performed for randomized trials comparing PCI and CABG for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. Among 3887 potentially relevant studies, 5 met inclusion criteria. The primary safety end point was defined as the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Secondary end points included a clinical effectiveness composite, which was defined as all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or repeat revascularization. Summary estimates were obtained using random-effects modeling. In total, 4594 patients were included in the analysis. There was no significant difference in the primary safety end point between the revascularization strategies (odds ratio [OR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-1.17; P=0.73). However, when compared with CABG, PCI was less effective (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.18-1.58; P<0.001) because of significantly higher rates of repeat revascularization (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.53-2.23; P<0.001). The incidence of all-cause death (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.78-1.35; P=0.61), myocardial infarction (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 0.88-2.45; P=0.08), and stroke (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.39-1.97; P=0.53) did not differ between PCI and CABG. Conclusions-PCI using drug-eluting stents and CABG are equally safe methods of revascularization for patients at low surgical risk with significant unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. However, CABG is associated with significantly lower rates of repeat revascularization.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Randomized Trial of Stents Versus Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease 5-Year Outcomes of the PRECOMBAT Study [J].
Ahn, Jung-Min ;
Roh, Jae-Hyung ;
Kim, Young-Hak ;
Park, Duk-Woo ;
Yun, Sung-Cheol ;
Lee, Pil Hyung ;
Chang, Mineok ;
Park, Hyun Woo ;
Lee, Seung-Whan ;
Lee, Cheol Whan ;
Park, Seong-Wook ;
Choo, Suk Jung ;
Chung, CheolHyun ;
Lee, JaeWon ;
Lim, Do-Sun ;
Rha, Seung-Woon ;
Lee, Sang-Gon ;
Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol ;
Kim, Hyo-Soo ;
Chae, In-Ho ;
Jang, Yangsoo ;
Jeong, Myung-Ho ;
Tahk, Seung-Jea ;
Seung, Ki Bae ;
Park, Seung-Jung .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 65 (20) :2198-2206
[2]  
[Anonymous], LANCET
[3]  
[Anonymous], N ENGL J MED
[4]  
[Anonymous], NEW ENGLAND J MED
[5]  
[Anonymous], OPTICAL COHERENCE TO
[6]   Randomized Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Unprotected Left Main Stem Stenosis [J].
Boudriot, Enno ;
Thiele, Holger ;
Walther, Thomas ;
Liebetrau, Christoph ;
Boeckstegers, Peter ;
Pohl, Tilmann ;
Reichart, Bruno ;
Mudra, Harald ;
Beier, Florian ;
Gansera, Brigitte ;
Neumann, Franz-Josef ;
Gick, Michael ;
Zietak, Thomas ;
Desch, Steffen ;
Schuler, Gerhard ;
Mohr, Friedrich-Wilhelm .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 57 (05) :538-545
[7]   COMPARISON OF SURGICAL AND MEDICAL GROUP SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH LEFT MAIN EQUIVALENT CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE - LONG-TERM CASS EXPERIENCE [J].
CARACCIOLO, EA ;
DAVIS, KB ;
SOPKO, G ;
KAISER, GC ;
CORLEY, SD ;
SCHAFF, H ;
TAYLOR, HA ;
CHAITMAN, BR .
CIRCULATION, 1995, 91 (09) :2335-2344
[8]   Clinical end points in coronary stent trials - A case for standardized definitions [J].
Cutlip, Donald E. ;
Windecker, Stephan ;
Mehran, Roxana ;
Boam, Ashley ;
Cohen, David J. ;
van Es, Gerrit-Anne ;
Steg, P. Gabriel ;
Morel, Marie-angele ;
Mauri, Laura ;
Vranckx, Pascal ;
McFadden, Eugene ;
Lansky, Alexandra ;
Hamon, Martial ;
Krucoff, Mitchell W. ;
Serruys, Patrick W. .
CIRCULATION, 2007, 115 (17) :2344-2351
[9]   When can odds ratios mislead? [J].
Davies, HTO ;
Crombie, IK ;
Tavakoli, M .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7136) :989-991
[10]   Outcomes With Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Stent Implantation A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials in the Era of Drug-Eluting Stents [J].
Elgendy, Islam Y. ;
Mahmoud, Ahmed N. ;
Elgendy, Akram Y. ;
Bavry, Anthony A. .
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 9 (04)