Long-term results of a prospective randomized trial of midline laparotomy closure with onlay mesh

被引:29
作者
Caro-Tarrago, A. [1 ]
Olona, C. [1 ]
Millan, M. [1 ]
Olona, M. [2 ]
Espina, B. [1 ]
Jorba, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Joan XXIII, Dept Surg, Gen & Digest Surg Serv, Tarragona 43007, Spain
[2] Univ Hosp Joan XXIII, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Tarragona, Spain
关键词
Incisional hernia; Polypropylene mesh; Prevention; VENTRAL HERNIA REPAIR; INCISIONAL HERNIA; CLINICAL-TRIAL; WOUND CLOSURE; HIGH-RISK; PREVENTION; REINFORCEMENT; COST;
D O I
10.1007/s10029-019-01891-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Incisional hernia (IH) continues to be one of the most common complications of laparotomy. The short-term protective effect of the use of mesh has been demonstrated in several studies. At present, there is little evidence on the long-term results of the prophylactic use of mesh. The aim of the present study is to analyze the long-term prevention of IH 5 years after a midline laparotomy during elective surgery. Methods A prospective study was performed including all of the 160 patients that had been previously included in the prospective, randomized, controlled trial performed between May 2009 and November 2012. The protocol and results at 1 year have been previously published in 2014. The patients in group A (mesh) were fitted with a polypropylene mesh to reinforce the standard abdominal wall closure. The patients in group B (non-mesh) underwent a standard abdominal wall closure and were not fitted with the mesh. All patients were followed for 5 years or until the diagnosis of incisional hernia was made, further surgery was performed, or the patient died. Cases lost to follow-up were also registered. Results Five years after surgery, in group A (mesh) we have found 4/80 (5.1%) incisional hernias, while in group B (no mesh) 37/80 patients were diagnosed with an incisional hernia (46.8%). The Kaplan-Meier survival curves for these results show statistically significant differences (p>0.001). Conclusion The protective effect of the use of an onlay mesh in abdominal wall closure is significantly maintained in the long-term, up to 5 years after surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 340
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Safety and efficacy of prophylactic onlay resorbable synthetic mesh with a comprehensive wound bundle at laparotomy closure in high-risk emergency abdominal surgery: an observational study
    Kelly, Emily
    Lloyd, Angus
    Alsaadi, Daniah
    Stephens, Ian
    Sugrue, Michael
    WORLD JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2025, 20 (01):
  • [32] Long-term Results of a Randomized Double-blinded Prospective Trial of a Lightweight (Ultrapro) Versus a Heavyweight Mesh (Prolene) in Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TULP-trial)
    Burgmans, Josephina P. J.
    Voorbrood, Charlotte E. H.
    Simmermacher, Rogier K. J.
    Schouten, Nelleke
    Smakman, Niels
    Clevers, GeertJan
    Davids, Paul H. P.
    Verleisdonk, EgbertJan M. M.
    Hamaker, Marije E.
    Lange, Johan F.
    van Dalen, Thijs
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2016, 263 (05) : 862 - 866
  • [33] Randomized clinical trial comparing polypropylene or polydioxanone for midline abdominal wall closure
    Bloemen, A.
    van Dooren, P.
    Huizinga, B. F.
    Hoofwijk, A. G. M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 (05) : 633 - 639
  • [34] Long-term follow-up (at 5 years) of midline incisional hernia repairs using a primary closure and prosthetic onlay technique: recurrence and quality of life
    M. Juvany
    C. Hoyuela
    F. Carvajal
    M. Trias
    A. Martrat
    J. Ardid
    Hernia, 2018, 22 : 319 - 324
  • [35] Prophylactic mesh placement to prevent parastomal hernia, early results of a prospective multicentre randomized trial
    Brandsma, H. T.
    Hansson, B. M. E.
    Aufenacker, T. J.
    van Geldere, D.
    van Lammeren, F. M.
    Mahabier, C.
    Steenvoorde, P.
    Reilingh, T. S. de Vries
    Wiezer, R. J.
    de Wilt, J. H. W.
    Bleichrodt, R. P.
    Rosman, C.
    HERNIA, 2016, 20 (04) : 535 - 541
  • [36] Effects of the short-stitch technique for midline abdominal closure: short-term results from the randomised-controlled ESTOIH trial
    Albertsmeier, M.
    Hofmann, A.
    Baumann, P.
    Riedl, S.
    Reisensohn, C.
    Kewer, J. L.
    Hoelderle, J.
    Shamiyeh, A.
    Klugsberger, B.
    Maier, T. D.
    Schumacher, G.
    Kockerling, F.
    Pession, U.
    Weniger, M.
    Fortelny, R. H.
    HERNIA, 2022, 26 (01) : 87 - 95
  • [37] Long-term follow-up (at 5 years) of midline incisional hernia repairs using a primary closure and prosthetic onlay technique: recurrence and quality of life
    Juvany, M.
    Hoyuela, C.
    Carvajal, F.
    Trias, M.
    Martrat, A.
    Ardid, J.
    HERNIA, 2018, 22 (02) : 319 - 324
  • [38] The use of synthetic mesh in contaminated and infected abdominal wall repairs: challenging the dogma-A long-term prospective clinical trial
    Birolini, C.
    de Miranda, J. S.
    Tanaka, E. Y.
    Utiyama, E. M.
    Rasslan, S.
    Birolini, D.
    HERNIA, 2020, 24 (02) : 307 - 323
  • [39] Prophylactic slowly resorbable mesh in midline laparotomy to limit incisional hernia incidence: the prospective 'Mesh Augmented Reinforcement of Abdominal Wall Suture Line (MARS)' cohort study protocol
    van den Dop, Louis Matthijs
    Molina-Villar, Jose M.
    Makarainen, Elisa
    Torkington, Jared
    Weyhe, Dirk
    Koncar, Igor
    Lange, Johan F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY PROTOCOLS, 2024, 28 (02): : 58 - 63
  • [40] Prophylactic mesh augmentation in emergency laparotomy closure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis
    Marcolin, P.
    Mazzola Poli de Figueiredo, S.
    Oliveira Trindade, B.
    Bueno Motter, S.
    Brandao, G. R.
    Mao, R. M. d.
    Moffett, J. M.
    HERNIA, 2024, 28 (03) : 677 - 690