Ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers with segmental or equivalent refractive indices

被引:53
作者
Omoto, Miki Kamikawatoko [1 ]
Torii, Hidemasa [1 ]
Masui, Sachiko [1 ]
Ayaki, Masahiko [1 ]
Tsubota, Kazuo [1 ]
Negishi, Kazuno [1 ]
机构
[1] Keio Univ, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
INTRAOCULAR-LENS POWER; AXIAL LENGTH; INTERFEROMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; REPEATABILITY; FORMULA; AGREEMENT; DEVICES; EYES;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-019-42968-3
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This study compared the axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), mean anterior corneal radius of curvature (Rm), and postoperative refractive outcomes obtained from two different swept-source optical coherence biometers, the ARGOS (Movu, Nagoya, Japan), which uses the segmental refractive index for each segment, and the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), which uses an equivalent refractive index for the entire eye. One hundred and six eyes of 106 patients with cataracts were included. The refractive outcomes using the Barrett Universal II, Haigis, Hoffer Q, and SRK/T formulas were evaluated. The mean AL, CCT, ACD, and Rm differed significantly (P < 0.001) with the IOLMaster 700 (25.22 mm, 559 mu m, 3.23 mm, and 7.69 mm) compared with the ARGOS (25.14 mm, 533 mu m, 3.33 mm, and 7.66 mm). The mean LTs did not differ significantly. The percentages of eyes within +/- 0.50 and +/- 1.00 diopter of the predicted refraction did not differ significantly (P > 0.05). The accuracy of the intraocular lens power calculations was clinically acceptable with both biometers, although the ocular biometry using these two biometers exhibited certain differences.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [2] Bland JM, 1999, STAT METHODS MED RES, V8, P135, DOI 10.1177/096228029900800204
  • [3] Faria-Ribeiro Miguel, 2014, J Optom, V7, P75, DOI 10.1016/j.optom.2013.12.005
  • [4] Fercher A. F., 1986, Proceedings of the SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, V658, P48, DOI 10.1117/12.938523
  • [5] EYE-LENGTH MEASUREMENT BY INTERFEROMETRY WITH PARTIALLY COHERENT-LIGHT
    FERCHER, AF
    MENGEDOHT, K
    WERNER, W
    [J]. OPTICS LETTERS, 1988, 13 (03) : 186 - 188
  • [6] Evaluation of the repeatability of a swept-source ocular biometer for measuring ocular biometric parameters
    Ferrer-Blasco, Teresa
    Dominguez-Vicent, Alberto
    Esteve-Taboada, Jose J.
    Aloy, Miguel A.
    Adsuara, Jose E.
    Montes-Mico, Robert
    [J]. GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 255 (02) : 343 - 349
  • [7] Comparison of 3 biometry devices in cataract patients
    Goebels, Susanne
    Pattmoeller, Max
    Eppig, Timo
    Cayless, Alan
    Seitz, Berthold
    Langenbucher, Achim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 41 (11) : 2387 - 2393
  • [8] Reproducibility of a Long-Range Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Ocular Biometry System and Comparison with Clinical Biometers
    Grulkowski, Ireneusz
    Liu, Jonathan J.
    Zhang, Jason Y.
    Potsaid, Benjamin
    Jayaraman, Vijaysekhar
    Cable, Alex E.
    Duker, Jay S.
    Fujimoto, James G.
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 120 (11) : 2184 - 2190
  • [9] Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis
    Haigis, W
    Lege, B
    Miller, N
    Schneider, B
    [J]. GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 238 (09) : 765 - 773
  • [10] Comparison of a new biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a conventional biometer using partial coherence interferometry
    Higashiyama, Tomoaki
    Mori, Hazuki
    Nakajima, Fumi
    Ohji, Masahito
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (04):