The PIVOTAL study: A randomized comparison of endovascular repair versus surveillance in patients with smaller abdominal aortic aneurysms

被引:53
作者
Ouriel, Kenneth [1 ]
机构
[1] New York Presbyterian Hosp, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
EVAR TRIAL 1; EXPERIENCE; DIAMETER; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; RUPTURE; SIZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2008.11.048
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The diameter of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is the single most important factor in deciding whether to repair an aneurysm or to monitor it conservatively. Open surgical repair does not appear to be beneficial until the diameter of the aneurysm is > 5.5 cm. Prospective clinical trials, however, confirmed a lower risk of operative mortality after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) than after open surgical repair. Further, retrospective analyses of EVAR databases suggested that EVAR outcome is directly related to aneurysm size and is better for smaller aneurysms than for larger aneurysms. Noting similar results with open surgical management vs surveillance in patients with smaller AAA, lower morbidity rates with EVAR vs open repair, and the favorable results with EVAR in smaller aneurysms, a clinical trial testing the hypothesis that EVAR is beneficial in patients with small AAA appeared warranted. To answer this question, the 70-site Positive Impact of endoVascular Options for Treating Aneurysm earLy (PIVOTAL) was begun. PIVOTAL has an enrollment goal of up to 1025 patients with a 4- to 5-cm AAA, randomly assigning patients to EVAR or surveillance. The primary end points of PIVOTAL are aneurysm rupture and AAA-related death at up to 36 months after randomization. When complete, the results of PIVOTAL should provide objective evidence to guide the use of EVAR for small AAAs. (J Vasc Surg 2009;49:266-9.)
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 269
页数:4
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   A statewide experience with endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: Rapid diffusion with excellent early results - Discussion [J].
Matsumura, JS ;
Anderson, PL ;
Muluk, SC ;
Green, RM ;
Dardik, A ;
Ricotta, JJ .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2004, 39 (01) :18-19
[2]  
Armon MP, 1997, J ENDOVASC SURG, V4, P279, DOI 10.1583/1074-6218(1997)004<0279:IOAAAS>2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]   Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms [J].
Blankensteijn, JD ;
de Jong, SECA ;
Prinssen, M ;
van der Ham, AC ;
Buth, J ;
van Sterkenburg, SMM ;
Verhagen, HJM ;
Buskens, E ;
Grobbee, DE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 352 (23) :2398-2405
[5]   Aneurysms in the history of medicine [J].
Bollinger, A ;
Rüttimann, B .
VASA-JOURNAL OF VASCULAR DISEASES, 2002, 31 (04) :281-286
[6]  
Brady AR, 2002, NEW ENGL J MED, V346, P1445
[7]   Risk factors for aneurysm rupture in patients kept under ultrasound surveillance [J].
Brown, LC ;
Powell, JT .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1999, 230 (03) :289-296
[8]   Comparison of surveillance vs aortic endografting for small aneurysm repair (CAESAR) trial:: Study design and progress [J].
Cao, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 30 (03) :245-251
[9]   Identifying and grading factors that modify the outcome of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair [J].
Chaikof, EL ;
Fillinger, MF ;
Matsumura, JS ;
Rutherford, RB ;
White, GH ;
Blankensteijn, JD ;
Bernhard, VM ;
Harris, PL ;
Kent, KC ;
May, J ;
Veith, FJ ;
Zarins, CK .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 35 (05) :1061-1066
[10]  
Glimaker H, 1991, Eur J Vasc Surg, V5, P125, DOI 10.1016/S0950-821X(05)80675-9