Effect of the Goals of Care Intervention for Advanced Dementia A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:184
作者
Hanson, Laura C. [1 ,2 ]
Zimmerman, Sheryl [1 ,3 ]
Song, Mi-Kyung [4 ]
Lin, Feng-Chang [5 ]
Rosemond, Cherie [6 ]
Carey, Timothy S. [1 ,2 ]
Mitchell, Susan L. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Cecil G Sheps Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Div Geriatr Med, Sch Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Sch Social Work, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] Emory Univ, Nell Hodgson Woodruff Sch Nursing, Ctr Nursing Excellence Palliat Care, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[5] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[6] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Partnerships Aging Program, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[7] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Hebrew Senior Life Inst Aging Res, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[8] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02215 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
OF-LIFE CARE; NURSING-HOME RESIDENTS; DECISION-MAKING; SERIOUS ILLNESS; OLDER-ADULTS; END; COMMUNICATION; SATISFACTION; QUALITY; HOSPICE;
D O I
10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7031
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE In advanced dementia, goals of care decisions are challenging and medical care is often more intensive than desired. OBJECTIVE To test a goals of care (GOC) decision aid intervention to improve quality of communication and palliative care for nursing home residents with advanced dementia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A single-blind cluster randomized clinical trial, including 302 residents with advanced dementia and their family decision makers in 22 nursing homes. INTERVENTIONS A GOC video decision aid plus a structured discussion with nursing home health care providers; attention control with an informational video and usual care planning. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcomes at 3 monthswere quality of communication (QOC, questionnaire scored 0-10 with higher ratings indicating better quality), family report of concordance with clinicians on the primary goal of care (endorsing same goal as the "best goal to guide care and medical treatment,"and clinicians' "top priority for care and medical treatment"), and treatment consistent with preferences (Advance Care Planning Problem score). Secondary outcomes at 9 months were family ratings of symptom management and care, palliative care domains in care plans, Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (MOST) completion, and hospital transfers. Resident-family dyads were the primary unit of analysis, and all analyses used intention-to-treat assignment. RESULTS Residents' mean age was 86.5 years, 39 (12.9%) were African American, and 246 (81.5%) were women. With the GOC intervention, family decision makers reported better quality of communication (QOC, 6.0 vs 5.6; P =.05) and better end-of-life communication (QOC end-of-life subscale, 3.7 vs 3.0; P = .02). Goal concordance did not differ at 3 months, but family decision makers with the intervention reported greater concordance by 9 months or death (133 [88.4%] vs 108 [71.2%], P = .001). Family ratings of treatment consistent with preferences, symptom management, and quality of care did not differ. Residents in the intervention group had more palliative care content in treatment plans (5.6 vs 4.7, P =.02), MOST order sets (35% vs 16%, P = .05), and half as many hospital transfers (0.078 vs 0.163 per 90 person-days; RR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.26-0.88). Survival at 9 months was unaffected (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.54-1.08; P = .13). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The GOC decision aid intervention is effective to improve end-of-life communication for nursing home residents with advanced dementia and enhance palliative care plans while reducing hospital transfers.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 31
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CLIN TRIALS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, BMJ
[3]   Tools to Promote Shared Decision Making in Serious Illness A Systematic Review [J].
Austin, C. Adrian ;
Mohottige, Dinushika ;
Sudore, Rebecca L. ;
Smith, Alexander K. ;
Hanson, Laura C. .
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 175 (07) :1213-1221
[4]  
Bercovitch Robert, 2002, J Am Med Dir Assoc, V3, P287, DOI 10.1016/S1525-8610(05)70542-9
[5]   Physician communication with family caregivers of long-term care residents at the end of life [J].
Biola, Holly ;
Sloane, Philip D. ;
Williams, Christianna S. ;
Daaleman, Timothy P. ;
Williams, Sharon W. ;
Zimmerman, Sheryl .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2007, 55 (06) :846-856
[6]   Transitions in Care for Older Adults with and without Dementia [J].
Callahan, Christopher M. ;
Arling, Greg ;
Tu, Wanzhu ;
Rosenman, Marc B. ;
Counsell, Steven R. ;
Stump, Timothy E. ;
Hendrie, Hugh C. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2012, 60 (05) :813-820
[7]  
Cassell EricJ., 1991, NATURE SUFFERING GOA
[8]   Connection, regulation, and care plan innovation: A case study of four nursing homes [J].
Colon-Emeric, Cathleen S. ;
Lekan-Rutledge, Deborah ;
Utley-Smith, Queen ;
Ammarell, Natalie ;
Bailey, Donald ;
Piven, Mary L. ;
Corazzini, Kirsten ;
Anderson, Ruth A. .
HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2006, 31 (04) :337-346
[9]   Family evaluation of hospice care: Results from voluntary submission of data via website [J].
Connor, SR ;
Teno, J ;
Spence, C ;
Smith, N .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2005, 30 (01) :9-17
[10]   Effect of Communication Skills Training for Residents and Nurse Practitioners on Quality of Communication With Patients With Serious Illness A Randomized Trial [J].
Curtis, J. Randall ;
Back, Anthony L. ;
Ford, Dee W. ;
Downey, Lois ;
Shannon, Sarah E. ;
Doorenbos, Ardith Z. ;
Kross, Erin K. ;
Reinke, Lynn F. ;
Feemster, Laura C. ;
Edlund, Barbara ;
Arnold, Richard W. ;
O'Connor, Kim ;
Engelberg, Ruth A. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 310 (21) :2271-2281