Treatment variables associated with outcome in emergency department patients with suspected sepsis

被引:8
作者
Sivayoham, Narani [1 ]
Blake, Lesley A. [1 ]
Tharimoopantavida, Shafi E. [1 ]
Chughtai, Saad [1 ]
Hussain, Adil N. [1 ]
Rhodes, Andrew [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] St Georges Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Emergency Med, Blackshaw Rd, London SW17 0QT, England
[2] St Georges Univ Hosp NHS FT, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care Med, Cramner Terrace, London SW17 0RE, England
[3] St Georges Univ London, Cramner Terrace, London SW17 0RE, England
关键词
Sepsis; Septic shock; Emergency department; Blood pressure; Time-to-treatment; Antibiotics; INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS DEFINITIONS; GOAL-DIRECTED THERAPY; SEPTIC SHOCK; ANTIBIOTICS; HYPOTENSION;
D O I
10.1186/s13613-020-00747-8
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundEarly treatment is advocated in the management of patients with suspected sepsis in the emergency department (ED). We sought to understand the association between the ED treatments and outcome in patients admitted with suspected sepsis. The treatments studied were: (i) the time to antibiotics, where time zero is the time the patient was booked in which is also the triage time; (ii) the volume of intravenous fluid (IVF); (iii) mean arterial pressure (MAP) after 2000 ml of IVF and (iv) the final MAP in the ED.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of the ED database of patients aged >= 18 year who met two SIRS criteria or one red flag sepsis criteria on arrival, received intravenous antibiotics for a suspected infection and admitted between 8th February 2016 and 31st August 2017. The primary outcome measure was all-cause in-hospital mortality. The four treatments stated above were controlled for severity of illness and subject to multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional-hazard regression to identify independent predictors of mortality.ResultsOf the 2,066 patients studied 272 (13.2%) died in hospital. The median time to antibiotics was 48 (interquartile range 30-82) minutes. The time to antibiotics was an independent predictor of mortality only in those who developed refractory hypotension (RH); antibiotics administered more than 55 mins after arrival was associated with an odds ratio (OR) for mortality of 2.75 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22-6.14]. The number-needed-to-treat was 4. IVF>2000 ml (95% CI>500->2100), except in RH, and a MAP <= 66 mmHg after 2000 ml of IVF were also independent predictors of mortality. The OR for mortality of IVF>2,000 ml in non-RH was 1.80 (95% CI 1.15-2.82); Number-needed-to-harm was 14. The OR for morality for a MAP <= 66 mmHg after 2000 ml of IVF was 3.42 (95% CI 2.10-5.57). A final MAP<75 mmHg in the ED was associated with, but not an independent predictor of mortality. An initial systolic blood pressure of<100 mmHg has a sensitivity of 63.3% and specificity of 88.4% for the development of RH.ConclusionIn this study, antibiotics were found to be time-critical in RH. Intravenous fluids>2000 ml (except in RH) and a MAP <= 66 mmHg after 2000 ml of IVF were also independent predictors of mortality.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] A positive fluid balance is an independent prognostic factor in patients with sepsis
    Acheampong, Angela
    Vincent, Jean-Louis
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2015, 19
  • [2] Prehospital antibiotics in the ambulance for sepsis: a multicentre, open label, randomised trial
    Alam, Nadia
    Oskam, Erick
    Stassen, Patricia M.
    van Exter, Pieternel
    van de Ven, Peter M.
    Haak, Harm R.
    Holleman, Frits
    van Zanten, Arthur
    van Leeuwen-Nguyen, Hien
    Bon, Victor
    Duineveld, Bart A. M.
    Panday, Rishi S. Nannan
    Kramer, Mark H. H.
    Nanayakkara, Prabath W. B.
    [J]. LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2018, 6 (01) : 40 - 50
  • [3] High versus Low Blood-Pressure Target in Patients with Septic Shock
    Asfar, Pierre
    Meziani, Ferhat
    Hamel, Jean-Francois
    Grelon, Fabien
    Megarbane, Bruno
    Anguel, Nadia
    Mira, Jean-Paul
    Dequin, Pierre-Francois
    Gergaud, Soizic
    Weiss, Nicolas
    Legay, Francois
    Le Tulzo, Yves
    Conrad, Marie
    Robert, Rene
    Gonzalez, Frederic
    Guitton, Christophe
    Tamion, Fabienne
    Tonnelier, Jean-Marie
    Guezennec, Pierre
    Van der Linden, Thierry
    Vieillard-Baron, Antoine
    Mariotte, Eric
    Pradel, Gael
    Lesieur, Olivier
    Ricard, Jean-Damien
    Herve, Fabien
    du Cheyron, Damien
    Guerin, Claude
    Mercat, Alain
    Teboul, Jean-Louis
    Radermacher, Peter
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 370 (17) : 1583 - 1593
  • [4] Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression
    Bursac, Zoran
    Gauss, C. Heath
    Williams, David Keith
    Hosmer, David W.
    [J]. SOURCE CODE FOR BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2008, 3 (01):
  • [5] Five myths about variable selection
    Heinze, Georg
    Dunkler, Daniela
    [J]. TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 30 (01) : 6 - 10
  • [6] Hosmer DW, 2013, WILEY SER PROBAB ST, P1
  • [7] Early Liberal Fluid Therapy for Sepsis Patients Is Not Harmful: Hydrophobia Is Unwarranted but Drink Responsibly
    Jaehne, Anja K.
    Rivers, Emanuel P.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (12) : 2263 - 2269
  • [8] Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock
    Kumar, Arland
    Roberts, Daniel
    Wood, Kenneth E.
    Light, Bruce
    Parrillo, Joseph E.
    Sharma, Satendra
    Suppes, Robert
    Feinstein, Daniel
    Zanotti, Sergio
    Taiberg, Leo
    Gurka, David
    Kumar, Aseem
    Cheang, Mary
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (06) : 1589 - 1596
  • [9] Association Between Early Intravenous Fluids Provided by Paramedics and Subsequent In-Hospital Mortality Among Patients With Sepsis
    Lane, Daniel J.
    Wunsch, Hannah
    Saskin, Refik
    Cheskes, Sheldon
    Lin, Steve
    Morrison, Laurie J.
    Scales, Damon C.
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2018, 1 (08)
  • [10] The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Bundle: 2018 update
    Levy, Mitchell M.
    Evans, Laura E.
    Rhodes, Andrew
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 44 (06) : 925 - 928