Semiotics of culture and intellectual history

被引:1
作者
Zenkin, Sergey [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Russian State Univ Humanities, Inst Higher Res Humanities, Moscow, Russia
[2] HSE Univ, Sch Arts & Humanities, St Petersburg, Russia
[3] Free Univ, Berlin, Germany
来源
NOVOE LITERATURNOE OBOZRENIE | 2022年 / 178期
关键词
semiotics of culture; intellectual history; synchrony;
D O I
10.53953/08696365_2022_178_6_273
中图分类号
I0 [文学理论];
学科分类号
0501 ; 050101 ;
摘要
The article attempts to methodologically compare two disciplines - the semiotics of culture, developed in the Soviet Union in the 1970-1980s, and intellectual history, which is rapidly developing in the world today. The comparison parameters are the transdisciplinarity, the breadth of empirical material, a synchronic (non-narrative) approach to history, the connection with the urgent problems of society (using the examples of the academic work of Carlo Ginzburg and Mikhail Iampolsky). Historically, intellectual history is not a direct heir to the semiotics of culture; it developed in parallel and not always in direct interaction with it, but some trends of contemporary intellectual history converge methodologically with structural semiotics of culture.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 280
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Benveniste E., 1995, VOCABULAIRE I INDOEU
[2]  
Ginzburg C, 2000, FORMAGGIO VERMI
[3]  
Ginzburg C., 2022, PUBLIC LECT HOUSE EU
[4]  
Iampolski M., 2007, TKACH VIZIONER OCHER
[5]  
Iampolski M., 2013, PROSTRANSTVENNAYA IS
[6]  
Iampolski M., 1993, VIDIMYY MIR OCHERKI
[7]  
Iampolski M., 2010, SKVOZ TUSKLOE STEKLO
[8]  
Iampolski M., 2004, FIZIOLOGIYA SIMVOLIC, V1
[9]  
Koselleck R., 2016, GESCHICHTLICHE GRUND, V1
[10]  
Lotman Ju.M., 1994, IZBRANNYE T, V1, P219