Prognostic value of preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in epithelial ovarian cancer

被引:16
|
作者
Lindgren, Auni [1 ]
Anttila, Maarit [1 ,2 ]
Arponen, Otso [3 ]
Rautiainen, Suvi [3 ]
Kononen, Mervi [3 ,4 ]
Vanninen, Ritva [3 ,5 ,6 ]
Sallinen, Hanna [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Eastern Finland, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Inst Clin Med Obstet & Gynecol, Kuopio, Finland
[2] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Gynecol, Kuopio, Finland
[3] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Radiol, Kuopio, Finland
[4] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Neurophysiol, Kuopio, Finland
[5] Univ Eastern Finland, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Inst Clin Med,Clin Radiol, Kuopio, Finland
[6] Univ Eastern Finland, Canc Ctr Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
关键词
Ovarian cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging; Biomarkers; Prognosis; APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT; TUMOR HETEROGENEITY; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; WEIGHTED MRI; PARAMETERS; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.03.023
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives: To investigate whether semi-quantitative and pharmacokinetic perfusion dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) parameters are associated with traditional prognostic factors and can predict clinical outcome in ovarian cancer (OC). Methods: This prospective study, approved by local ethical committee, enrolled 38 patients with primary OC, 2011-2014. After preoperative DCE-MRI (3.0 T), two observers measured perfusion (K-trans, K-ep, V-e, V-p) and semi-quantitative parameters (area under the curve, peak, time-to-peak) by drawing regions of interest (ROIs) covering the large solid lesion (L-ROI) and the most enhancing small area (S-ROI) (NordicICE platform). Kruskal-Wallis was used to analyze associations between MRI parameters and classified prognostic factors. Results: Mean K-trans values were higher in high-grade serous OC than in other types (L-ROI, P = 0.041; S-ROI, P = 0.018), and lower mean K-trans values predicted residual tumor (L-ROI P = 0.030; S-ROI, P = 0.012). Higher minimum V-p values were associated with higher International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage (S-ROI, P = 0.023). Shorter recurrence-free survival was predicted by higher V-e (minimum L-ROI, P = 0.035; maximum S-ROI, P = 0.046), V-p (maximum S-ROI, P = 0.033), and lower time-to-peak (maximum S-ROI, P = 0.047) in Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multiparametric MRI variables combining DCE and diffusion weighted data were also predictive for survival. Conclusion: DCE-MRI parameters may represent imaging biomarkers for predicting tumor aggressiveness and prognosis in OC. Higher K-trans levels were associated with better results in cytoreductive surgery but with earlier recurrence.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 73
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in early arthritis
    Zampogna, G.
    Parodi, M.
    Bartolini, B.
    Schettini, D.
    Minetti, G.
    D'Auria, M.
    Silvestri, E.
    Garlaschi, G.
    Cimmino, M. A.
    REUMATISMO, 2008, 60 (04) : 254 - 259
  • [32] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Magnetic Resonance in the Assessment of Peritoneal Recurrence of Ovarian Cancer in Patients with or Without BRCA Mutation
    Jankowska-Lombarska, Melania
    Grabowska-Derlatka, Laretta
    Kraj, Leszek
    Derlatka, Pawel
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (22)
  • [33] Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance lymphangiography
    Karen I. Ramirez-Suarez
    Luis O. Tierradentro-Garcia
    Christopher L. Smith
    Ganesh Krishnamurthy
    Fernando A. Escobar
    Hansel J. Otero
    Jordan B. Rapp
    Yoav Dori
    David M. Biko
    Pediatric Radiology, 2022, 52 : 285 - 294
  • [34] SEMIQUANTITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DYNAMIC CONTRAST-ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING MEASUREMENTS PREDICT RADIATION RESPONSE IN CERVIX CANCER
    Zahra, Mark A.
    Tan, Li Tee
    Priest, Andrew N.
    Graves, Martin J.
    Arends, Mark
    Crawford, Robin A. F.
    Brenton, James D.
    Lomas, David J.
    Sala, Evis
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 74 (03): : 766 - 773
  • [35] Are Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Images Necessary for Prostate Cancer Detection on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging?
    Mussi, Thais Caldara
    Martins, Tatiana
    Garcia, Rodrigo Gobbo
    Filippi, Renee Zon
    Lemos, Gustavo Caserta
    Baroni, Ronaldo Hueb
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2017, 15 (03) : E447 - E454
  • [36] Correlation Between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters in Rectal Cancer
    Sun, Hongliang
    Xu, Yanyan
    Xu, Qiaoyu
    Duan, Jianghui
    Zhang, Haibo
    Liu, Tongxi
    Li, Lu
    Chan, Queenie
    Xie, Sheng
    Wang, Wu
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2019, 26 (07) : E134 - E140
  • [37] Histogram analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to predict extramural venous invasion in rectal cancer
    Wang, Ke-xin
    Yu, Jing
    Xu, Qing
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [38] Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance lymphangiography
    Ramirez-Suarez, Karen I.
    Tierradentro-Garcia, Luis O.
    Smith, Christopher L.
    Krishnamurthy, Ganesh
    Escobar, Fernando A.
    Otero, Hansel J.
    Rapp, Jordan B.
    Dori, Yoav
    Biko, David M.
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2022, 52 (02) : 285 - 294
  • [39] A prospective comparison of integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced CT for pretreatment imaging of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer
    Hynninen, Johanna
    Kemppainen, Jukka
    Lavonius, Maija
    Virtanen, Johanna
    Matomaki, Jaakko
    Oksa, Sinikka
    Carpen, Olli
    Grenman, Seija
    Seppanen, Marko
    Auranen, Annika
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 131 (02) : 389 - 394
  • [40] Differentiation between Luminal A and B Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer Using Pharmacokinetic Quantitative Parameters with Histogram and Texture Features on Preoperative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Luo, Hong-Bing
    Du, Ming-Ying
    Liu, Yuan-Yuan
    Wang, Min
    Qing, Hao-Miao
    Wen, Zhi-peng
    Xu, Guo-Hui
    Zhou, Peng
    Ren, Jing
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2020, 27 (03) : E35 - E44