The ignoring paradox: Cueing distractor features leads first to selection, then to inhibition of to-be-ignored items

被引:187
作者
Moher, Jeff [1 ]
Egeth, Howard E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
关键词
Inhibition; Attention; Visual search; VISUAL WORKING-MEMORY; PRIORITIZING SELECTION; ATTENTIONAL CONTROL; FOCUSED ATTENTION; TIME-COURSE; POP-OUT; SEARCH; COLOR; MARKING; GUIDANCE;
D O I
10.3758/s13414-012-0358-0
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Observers find a target item more quickly when they have foreknowledge of target-defining attributes, such as identity, color, or location. However, it is less clear whether foreknowledge of nontarget attributes can also speed search. Munneke, Van der Stigchel, and Theeuwes Acta Psychologica 129:101-107, (2008) found that observers found the target more quickly when they were cued to ignore a region of space where a target would not appear. Using a similar paradigm, we explored the effects of cueing nontarget features on search. We found that when we cued observers to ignore nontarget features, search was slowed. The results from a probe-dot detection task revealed that this slowing occurred because, paradoxically, observers initially selected an item appearing in the to-be-ignored color. Finally, we found that cueing nontarget features sped search when placeholders matching the location of the to-be-ignored color preceded presentation of the search display by at least 800 ms; thus, it appears that some limited inhibition of to-be-ignored items occurs following selection. Taken together, these results suggest that observers are unable to explicitly avoid selection of items matching known nontarget features. Instead, when nontarget features are cued, observers select the to-be-ignored feature or the locations of objects matching that feature early in search, and only inhibit them after this selection process.
引用
收藏
页码:1590 / 1605
页数:16
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1967, Cognitive Psychology
[2]   The linear separability effect in color visual search: Ruling out the additive color hypothesis [J].
Bauer, B ;
Jolicoeur, P ;
Cowan, WB .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1998, 60 (06) :1083-1093
[3]   The psychophysics toolbox [J].
Brainard, DH .
SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04) :433-436
[4]   Filtering items of mass distraction: Top-down biases against distractors are necessary for the feature-based carry-over to occur [J].
Braithwaite, Jason J. ;
Humphreys, Glyn W. .
VISION RESEARCH, 2007, 47 (12) :1570-1583
[5]   Effects of colour on preview search: Anticipatory and inhibitory biases for colour [J].
Braithwaite, JJ ;
Humphreys, GW ;
Hodsoll, J .
SPATIAL VISION, 2004, 17 (4-5) :389-415
[6]   Color grouping in space and time: Evidence from negative color-based carryover effects in preview search [J].
Braithwaite, JJ ;
Humphreys, GW ;
Hodsoll, J .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2003, 29 (04) :758-778
[7]   Inhibition and anticipation in visual search: Evidence from effects of color foreknowledge on preview search [J].
Braithwaite, JJ ;
Humphreys, GW .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2003, 65 (02) :213-237
[8]   Top-Down Attentional Control for Distractor Locations: The Benefit of Precuing Distractor Locations on Target Localization and Discrimination [J].
Chao, Hsuan-Fu .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2010, 36 (02) :303-316
[9]   Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets [J].
Donk, M ;
Theeuwes, J .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2001, 63 (05) :891-900
[10]   Competition in visual working memory for control of search [J].
Downing, PE ;
Dodds, CM .
VISUAL COGNITION, 2004, 11 (06) :689-703