Management of novel ecosystems: are novel approaches required?

被引:358
作者
Seastedt, Timothy R. [1 ,2 ]
Hobbs, Richard J. [3 ]
Suding, Katharine N. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, INSTAAR, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[3] Murdoch Univ, Sch Environm Sci, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
[4] Univ Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1890/070046
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Most ecosystems are now sufficiently altered in structure and function to qualify as novel systems, and this recognition should be the starting point for ecosystem management efforts. Under the emerging biogeochemical configurations, management activities are experiments, blurring the line between basic and applied research. Responses to specific management manipulations are context specific, influenced by the current status or structure of the system, and this necessitates reference areas for management or restoration activities. Attempts to return systems to within their historical range of biotic and abiotic characteristics and processes may not be possible, and management activities directed at removing undesirable features of novel ecosystems may perpetuate or create such ecosystems. Management actions should attempt to maintain genetic and species diversity and encourage the biogeochemical characteristics that favor desirable species. Few resources currently exist to support the addition of proactive measures and rigorous experimental designs to current management activities. The necessary changes will not occur without strong input from stakeholders and policy makers, so rapid information transfer and proactive research-management activities by the scientific community are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 553
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, PANARCHY UNDERSTANDI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, ECOSYSTEMS HUMAN WEL
[3]   Fire, fuels and restoration of ponderosa pine-Douglas fir forests in the Rocky Mountains, USA [J].
Baker, William L. ;
Veblen, Thomas T. ;
Sherriff, Rosemary L. .
JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2007, 34 (02) :251-269
[4]   Adaptive management of forest ecosystems: Did some rubber hit the road? [J].
Bormann, Bernard T. ;
Haynes, Richard W. ;
Martin, Jon R. .
BIOSCIENCE, 2007, 57 (02) :186-191
[5]  
Bush R. T., 2007, Ecological Restoration, V25, P169, DOI 10.3368/er.25.3.169
[6]   Policy strategies to address sustainability of Alaskan boreal forests in response to a directionally changing climate [J].
Chapin, F. Stuart, III ;
Lovecraft, Amy L. ;
Zavaleta, Erika S. ;
Nelson, Joanna ;
Robards, Martin D. ;
Kofinas, Gary P. ;
Trainor, Sarah F. ;
Peterson, Garry D. ;
Huntington, Henry P. ;
Naylor, Rosamond L. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2006, 103 (45) :16637-16643
[7]   Time lags and novel ecosystems in response to transient climatic change in arctic Alaska [J].
Chapin III F.S. ;
Starfield A.M. .
Climatic Change, 1997, 35 (4) :449-461
[8]  
CHERVIN KL, RESTOR ECOL IN PRESS
[9]   The report of the ecological society of America committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management [J].
Christensen, NL ;
Bartuska, AM ;
Brown, JH ;
Carpenter, S ;
DAntonio, C ;
Francis, R ;
Franklin, JF ;
MacMahon, JA ;
Noss, RF ;
Parsons, DJ ;
Peterson, CH ;
Turner, MG ;
Woodmansee, RG .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1996, 6 (03) :665-691
[10]   After biocontrol: Assessing indirect effects of insect releases [J].
Denslow, JS ;
D'Antonio, CM .
BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2005, 35 (03) :307-318