Comparison of PID and Fuzzy Controller for Position Control of AR.Drone

被引:0
|
作者
Prayitno, A. [1 ]
Indrawati, V. [1 ]
Trusulaw, I. I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Surabaya UBAYA, Elect Engn Dept, Surabaya 60293, East Java, Indonesia
关键词
D O I
10.1088/1757-899X/190/1/012006
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
This paper describes the implementation of the PID Controller to control the position of the AR. Drone in the x-y-z. This position control scheme uses three PID controllers to maintain the position of x, y and z using the signal control pitch, roll and vertical rate. PID Controller implemented on AR. Drone 2.0 and then tested in an indoor space. The performance of the controller will be compared with Fuzzy Logic Controller schemes that have been implemented previously. The results show that the PID Controller generate a response with rise time less than 3 seconds at the x and y position with around 25% overshoot. The result for z position give better result without overshoot. The comparison between fuzzy logic and PID Controller indicates that the results of the PID controller is better although there is overshoot.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fractional Order PD Path-Following Control of an AR.Drone Quadrotor
    Cajo, Ricardo
    Copot, Cosmin
    Ionescu, Clara M.
    De Keyser, Robin
    Plaza, Douglas
    2018 IEEE 12TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON APPLIED COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE AND INFORMATICS (SACI), 2018, : 291 - 296
  • [22] Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System Identification for the Dynamics of the AR.Drone Quadcopter
    Santoso, Fendy
    Garratt, Matthew A.
    Anavatti, Sreenatha G.
    2016 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY ENGINEERING AND APPLICATION (ICSEEA), 2016, : 55 - 60
  • [23] Framework for Autonomous On-board Navigation with the AR.Drone
    Jacobo Jiménez Lugo
    Andreas Zell
    Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 2014, 73 : 401 - 412
  • [24] Framework for Autonomous On-board Navigation with the AR.Drone
    Lugo, Jacobo Jimenez
    Zell, Andreas
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & ROBOTIC SYSTEMS, 2014, 73 (1-4) : 401 - 412
  • [25] Autonomous Indoor Object Tracking with the Parrot AR.Drone
    Chakrabarty, Anjan
    Morris, Robert
    Bouyssounouse, Xavier
    Hunt, Rusty
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (ICUAS), 2016, : 25 - 30
  • [26] Design and flight experiments of a Tube-Based Model Predictive Controller for the AR.Drone 2.0 quadrotor
    Michel, N.
    Bertrand, S.
    Olaru, S.
    Valmorbida, G.
    Dumur, D.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2019, 52 (22): : 112 - 117
  • [27] Comparison between a fuzzy PID controller and a kind of nonlinear PID controller
    Liu, C
    Xu, JX
    Hang, CC
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 36TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-5, 1997, : 2736 - 2741
  • [28] Fuzzy PID controller: Design, tuning and comparison with conventional PID controller
    Khan, Asim Ali
    Rapal, Nishkam
    2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2006, : 471 - 476
  • [29] AR.Drone UAV control parameters tuning based on particle swarm optimization algorithm
    Thi Thoa Mac
    Copot, Cosmin
    Trung Tran Duc
    De Keyser, Robin
    PROCEEDING OF 2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATION, QUALITY AND TESTING, ROBOTICS (AQTR), 2016, : 475 - 480
  • [30] Comparison of Position Control of a Gyroscopic Inverted Pendulum Using PID, Fuzzy Logic and Fuzzy PID controllers
    Rabah, Mohammed
    Rohan, Ali
    Kim, Sung-Ho
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY LOGIC AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2018, 18 (02) : 103 - 110