Diagnosing depression in primary care: a Rasch analysis of the major depression inventory

被引:18
作者
Christensen, Kaj Sparle [1 ,2 ]
Oernboel, Eva [3 ]
Nielsen, Marie Germund [1 ,2 ]
Bech, Per [4 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Res Unit Gen Practice, Bartholins Alle 2, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Sect Gen Med Practice, Bartholins Alle 2, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Res Clin Funct Disorders & Psychosomat, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Mental Hlth Ctr North Zealand, Psychiat Res Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Depression; Diagnosis; Mass Screening; Primary Health Care; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Psychometrics; MEASUREMENT MODEL; VALIDITY; SEVERITY; INDEX;
D O I
10.1080/02813432.2019.1568703
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This study aims to assess the measurement properties of the Major Depression Inventory (MDI) in a clinical sample of primary care patients. Design: General practitioners (GPs) handed out the MDI to patients aged 18-65 years on clinical suspicion of depression. Setting: Thirty-seven general practices in the Central Denmark Region participated in the study. Patients: Data for 363 patients (65% females, mean age: 49.8 years, SD: 17.7) consulting their GP were included in the analysis. Main outcome measures: The overall fit to the Rasch model, individual item and person fit, and adequacy of response categories were tested. Statistical tests for local dependency, unidimensionality, differential item functioning, and correct targeting of the scale were performed. The person separation reliability index was calculated. All analyses were performed using RUMM2030 software. Results: Items 9 and 10 demonstrated misfit to the Rasch model, and all items demonstrated disordered response categories. After modifying the original six-point to a five-point scoring system, ordered response categories were achieved for all 10 items. The MDI items seemed well targeted to the population approached. Model fit was also achieved for core symptoms of depression (items 1-3) and after dichotomization of items according to diagnostic procedure. Conclusion: Despite some minor problems with its measurement structure, the MDI seems to be a valid instrument for identification of depression among adults in primary care. The results support screening for depression based on core symptoms and dichotomization of items according to diagnostic procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 112
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Rasch analysis of the PedsQL: an increased understanding of the properties of a rating scale [J].
Amin, Leila ;
Rosenbaum, Peter ;
Barr, Ronald ;
Sung, Lillian ;
Klaassen, Robert J. ;
Dix, David B. ;
Klassen, Anne .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 65 (10) :1117-1123
[2]   The validity of self-rating depression scales in patients with chronic widespread pain: a Rasch analysis of the Major Depression Inventory [J].
Amris, K. ;
Omerovic, E. ;
Danneskiold-Samsoe, B. ;
Bliddal, H. ;
Waehrens, E. E. .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2016, 45 (03) :236-246
[3]   SUFFICIENT STATISTICS AND LATENT TRAIT MODELS [J].
ANDERSEN, EB .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1977, 42 (01) :69-81
[4]  
Andrich D, 2010, Rumm2030: Rasch Unidimensional Measurement Models [computer software]
[5]  
Andrich D., 2011, Rasch Models for Measurement
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1960, STUDIES MATH PSYCHOL
[7]   The major depression rating scale (MDS). Inter-rater reliability and validity across different settings in randomized moclobemide trials [J].
Bech, P ;
Stage, KB ;
Nair, NPV ;
Larsen, JK ;
KraghSorensen, P ;
Gjerris, A .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 1997, 42 (01) :39-48
[8]   The sensitivity and specificity of the Major Depression Inventory, using the Present State Examination as the index of diagnostic validity [J].
Bech, P ;
Rasmussen, NA ;
Olsen, LR ;
Noerholm, V ;
Abildgaard, W .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2001, 66 (2-3) :159-164
[9]   Psychometric evaluation of the Major Depression Inventory (MDI) as depression severity scale using the LEAD (Longitudinal Expert Assessment of All Data) as index of validity [J].
Bech, Per ;
Timmerby, N. ;
Martiny, K. ;
Lunde, M. ;
Soendergaard, S. .
BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 15
[10]   Case-finding and risk-group screening for depression in primary care [J].
Christensen, Kaj Sparle ;
Sokolowski, Ineta ;
Olesen, Frede .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE, 2011, 29 (02) :80-84