Positive surgical margins in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ-confined disease at radical prostatectomy: Histologic features and pitfalls

被引:34
作者
Chuang, Ai-Ying
Epstein, Jonathan I.
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Taipei 112, Taiwan
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
关键词
prostate; prostatectomy; capsular incision; margin;
D O I
10.1097/PAS.0b013e318162a8bf
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Capsular incision (CI) refers to the urologist transecting either benign or malignant prostatic tissue, where the edge of the prostate in this region is left within the patient. Histologic assessment of Cl is difficult and its diagnosis varies among pathologists. Between 1993 and 2004, we reviewed 186 radical prostatectomies that were signed out as either: (1) CI into tumor in otherwise organ-confined disease [elsewhere no extra-prostatic extension (EPE), seminal vesicle invasion, or lymph node spread] (n = 143); (2) positive surgical margin in an area difficult to distinguish EPE from CI into tumor in otherwise organ-confined disease (n = 36); or (3) equivocal positive surgical margin in an area difficult to distinguish organ-confined disease with tumor close to resection margins (OC M-) from CI into tumor in otherwise organ-confined disease (n = 7). On review, CI with a positive margin was confirmed in 83.2% of cases. Of cases signed out with margins positive where it was difficult to distinguish CI from EPE, CI was confirmed in 52.8% of cases. Cases with equivocal positive margins with either CI or OC M were considered CI with positive margins in 57.1% of cases on review. Cases in all 3 groups not considered positive margins with CI were on review equally divided between diagnoses of organ-confined margin negative and EPE with positive margins. The locations of the 39 cases originally misdiagnosed as definitive or questionable CI with positive margins were posterolateral (N = 19, 48.7%), distal (N = 12, 30.8%), posterior (N = 6, 15.4%), and anterolateral (N 2, 5.1%). Familiarity with different patterns of EPE in different anatomic locations and applying strict criteria for diagnosing Cl into tumor can minimize overcalling CI and can provide accurate feedback to urologists to prevent iatrogenic positive margins.
引用
收藏
页码:1201 / 1206
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: The perineal approach increases the risk of surgically induced positive margins and capsular incisions [J].
Boccon-Gibod, L ;
Ravery, V ;
Vordos, D ;
Toublanc, M ;
Delmas, V ;
Boccon-Gibod, L .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (04) :1383-1385
[2]  
Cheng L, 1999, CANCER, V86, P1775, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19991101)86:9<1775::AID-CNCR20>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-L
[4]   The significance of positive surgical margin in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ confined disease at radical prostatectomy [J].
Chuang, Ai-Ying ;
Nielsen, Matthew E. ;
Hernandez, David J. ;
Walsh, Patrick C. ;
Epstein, Jonathan I. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 178 (04) :1306-1310
[5]   Do close but negative margins in radical prostatectomy specimens increase the risk of postoperative progression? [J].
Epstein, JI ;
Sauvageot, J .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (01) :241-243
[6]   EVALUATION OF RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY CAPSULAR MARGINS OF RESECTION - THE SIGNIFICANCE OF MARGINS DESIGNATED AS NEGATIVE, CLOSELY APPROACHING, AND POSITIVE [J].
EPSTEIN, JI .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1990, 14 (07) :626-632
[7]   Prognostic factors and reporting of prostate carcinoma in radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens [J].
Epstein, JI ;
Amin, M ;
Boccon-Gibod, L ;
Egevad, L ;
Humphrey, PA ;
Mikuz, G ;
Newling, D ;
Nilsson, S ;
Sakr, W ;
Srigley, JR ;
Wheeler, TM ;
Montironi, R .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2005, 39 :34-63
[8]   Incidence and significance of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens [J].
Epstein, JI .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1996, 23 (04) :651-&
[9]   Adverse prognostic significance of capsular incision with radical retropubic prostatectomy [J].
Shuford, MD ;
Cookson, MS ;
Chang, SS ;
Shintani, AK ;
Tsiatis, A ;
Smith, JA ;
Shappell, SB .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (01) :119-123
[10]   Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens [J].
Swindle, P ;
Eastham, JA ;
Ohori, M ;
Kattan, MW ;
Wheeler, T ;
Maru, N ;
Slawin, K ;
Scardino, PT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (03) :903-907