Repeat prostate biopsies prior to radical prostatectomy do not impact erectile function recovery and mid- to long-term continence

被引:2
作者
Furrer, Marc A. [1 ]
Vilaseca, Antoni [2 ]
Corradi, Renato B. [3 ]
Boxler, Silvan [1 ]
Thalmann, George N. [1 ]
Nguyen, Daniel P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Dept Urol, Bern, Switzerland
[2] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Dept Urol, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Hosp Rede Mater Saude, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
关键词
biopsy; erectile dysfunction; prostate cancer; prostatectomy; urinary incontinence; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; CANCER; OUTCOMES; RISK; MEN; DYSFUNCTION; URINARY; COHORT; ERA;
D O I
10.1002/pros.23509
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundA growing number of men undergo repeat biopsies prior to radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. However, the long-term impact of repeat biopsies on functional outcomes in this patient population remains unelucidated. Thus, we compared functional outcomes between patients who underwent single biopsy versus repeat biopsies before radical prostatectomy. MethodsFrom 1996 to 2015, 1015 consecutive patients underwent radical prostatectomy, and subsequently had urinary continence and erectile function assessed for >2 years follow-up. One-fourth of patients (275; 27%) had 2 biopsies before prostatectomy. Logistic regression models tested whether repeat biopsy before prostatectomy predicted continence or erectile function recovery. ResultsFor the overall cohort, continence rates were 84%, 92%, 96%, and 98% at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Repeat biopsy before prostatectomy was associated with lower continence rate at 3 months compared to single biopsy (P=0.03); however, no significant differences were observed at 6, 12, or 24 months. In multivariable analyses adjusting for age, body mass index and diabetes/cardiovascular disease/smoking, the association between repeat biopsy and lower likelihood of continence at 3 months remained (odds ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.47-0.97; P=0.03). Overall erectile function recovery rates were 16%, 33%, 51%, and 55% at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. No difference in erectile function recovery rates was seen at any time point for single biopsy versus repeat biopsy. In multivariable analyses, repeat biopsy was not predictive of erectile function recovery at any time point. ConclusionsRepeat biopsy before radical prostatectomy impairs early continence after surgery. However, erectile function recovery and mid-term to long-term continence are not affected. These data support the current trend towards active surveillance and delayed local treatment in patients with low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 636
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical and cost impact of second-opinion pathology - Review of prostate biopsies prior to radical prostatectomy
    Epstein, JI
    Walsh, PC
    Sanfilippo, F
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1996, 20 (07) : 851 - 857
  • [42] Prostate cancer-related anxiety among long-term survivors after radical prostatectomy: A longitudinal study
    Meissner, Valentin H.
    Peter, Cornelia
    Ankerst, Donna P.
    Schiele, Stefan
    Gschwend, Juergen E.
    Herkommer, Kathleen
    Dinkel, Andreas
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (04): : 4842 - 4851
  • [43] Perioperative patient education improves long-term satisfaction rates of low-risk prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy
    Kretschmer, Alexander
    Buchner, Alexander
    Grabbert, Markus
    Sommer, Anne
    Herlemann, Annika
    Stief, Christian G.
    Bauer, Ricarda M.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 35 (08) : 1205 - 1212
  • [44] Does topical hemostatic agent (FlosealA®) have a long-term adverse effect on erectile function recovery after nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?
    Martorana, Eugenio
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Kaleci, Shaniko
    Pirola, Giacomo Maria
    Bevilacqua, Luigi
    Bonetti, Luca Reggiani
    Puliatti, Stefano
    Micali, Salvatore
    Bianchi, Giampaolo
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2017, 49 (09) : 1519 - 1526
  • [45] Recovery of urinary continence following radical prostatectomy:: The impact of prostate volume -: Analysis of data from the CaPSURE™ database
    Konety, Badrinath R.
    Sadetsky, Natalia
    Carroll, Peter R.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (04) : 1423 - 1425
  • [46] Longitudinal recovery patterns of penile length and the underexplored benefit of long-term phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor use after radical prostatectomy
    Kwon, Young Suk
    Farber, Nicholas
    Yu, Ji Woong
    Rhee, Kevin
    Han, Christopher
    Ney, Patrick
    Hong, Jeong Hee
    Lee, Paul
    Gupta, Nikhil
    Kim, Wun-Jae
    Kim, Isaac Yi
    BMC UROLOGY, 2018, 18
  • [47] Surgical and non-surgical predictors of long term erectile function after robot assisted radical prostatectomy
    Tillier, C. N.
    Cox, I. L.
    Hagens, M. J.
    Nicolai, M. P. J.
    van Muilekom, H. A. M.
    van Leeuwen, P. J.
    van de Poll-Franse, L., V
    van der Poel, H. G.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2024, 32 (11)
  • [48] A cadaveric histological investigation of the prostate with three-dimensional reconstruction for better results in continence and erectile function after radical prostatectomy
    Ozdemir, M. B.
    Eskicorapci, S. Y.
    Baydar, D. E.
    Cumhur, M.
    Onderoglu, S.
    Ozen, H.
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2007, 10 (01) : 77 - 81
  • [49] A Prospective Analysis of the Effects of Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy on Urinary Continence Based on Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite and International Index of Erectile Function Scoring Systems
    Hefermehl, Lukas
    Bossert, Karolin
    Ramakrishnan, Venkat M.
    Seifert, Burkhardt
    Lehmann, Kurt
    INTERNATIONAL NEUROUROLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 22 (02) : 123 - 132
  • [50] A cadaveric histological investigation of the prostate with three-dimensional reconstruction for better results in continence and erectile function after radical prostatectomy
    M B Özdemir
    S Y Eskicorapci
    D E Baydar
    M Cumhur
    S Önderoğlu
    H Özen
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2007, 10 : 77 - 81