Assessment of the Accuracy of Multiple Sonographic Fetal Weight Estimation Formulas A 10-Year Experience From a Single Center

被引:1
作者
Barel, Oshri [1 ]
Vaknin, Zvi [1 ]
Tovbin, Josef [1 ]
Herman, Arie [1 ]
Maymon, Ron [1 ]
机构
[1] Assaf Harofeh Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, IL-70300 Zerifin, Israel
关键词
accuracy; estimation; fetal weight; models; sonography; TERM BIRTH-WEIGHT; ULTRASONIC ESTIMATION; FEMUR LENGTH; MATERNAL CHARACTERISTICS; HEAD MEASUREMENTS; PREDICTION; CIRCUMFERENCE; CHARTS; SIZE; MODEL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives-The primary aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation models. The secondary aim was to define the most accurate time (4-7 or 3 days before delivery) for evaluating fetal weight. Methods-In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 12,798 sonographic fetal weight estimations were analyzed, of which 9459 were performed within 3 days of delivery and 3339 within 4 to 7 days. The cohort included all singleton pregnancies recorded at a single medical center from January 2000 to December 2010, with 24 weeks' gestation minimum. Predicted birth weights were calculated according to 23 sonographic fetal weight estimation models; in total, 294,354 sonographic weight estimations were evaluated and compared to the actual birth weights. Results-The accuracy of the models in predicting birth weight differed considerably. The most accurate models used 3 or more fetal measurements followed by models using abdominal circumference only. The models developed by Sabbagha et al (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160:854-862) proved most accurate, with a mean percent error of-0.2% and greater than 92% of estimates within 15% of birth weight (P<.05). Nineteen sonographic fetal weight estimation models (82.6%) better predicted fetal weight at 4 to 7 days before delivery (P<.001). Twenty-two (95%) of the models were less accurate at the extreme ends of fetal weight. Conclusions-Different formulas for fetal weight estimation vary greatly; we recommend that each center should evaluate the most accurate formula according to its attending population. Estimation of fetal weight performed 4 to 7 days before delivery using most models was more accurate than estimations performed 3 days before delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:815 / 823
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[11]  
Hendrix NW, 2000, J REPROD MED, V45, P317
[12]   ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT FROM ULTRASONIC MEASUREMENT OF TRUNK CIRCUMFERENCE [J].
HIGGINBOTTOM, J ;
SLATER, J ;
PORTER, G ;
WHITFIELD, CR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1975, 82 (09) :698-701
[13]  
JACKSON DW, 1990, J AM OSTEOPATH ASSOC, V90, P1071
[14]   ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT BY ULTRASOUND [J].
JORDAAN, HVF .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 1983, 11 (02) :59-66
[15]   New fetal weight estimation models using fractional limb volume [J].
Lee, W. ;
Balasubramaniam, M. ;
Deter, R. L. ;
Yeo, L. ;
Hassan, S. S. ;
Gotsch, F. ;
Kusanovic, J. P. ;
Goncalves, L. F. ;
Romero, R. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 34 (05) :556-565
[16]   Prediction of fetal macrosomia: effect of sonographic fetal weight-estimation model and threshold used [J].
Melamed, N. ;
Yogev, Y. ;
Meizner, I. ;
Mashiach, R. ;
Pardo, J. ;
Ben-Haroush, A. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 38 (01) :74-81
[17]   Sonographic Fetal Weight Estimation Which Model Should Be Used? [J].
Melamed, Nir ;
Yogev, Yariv ;
Meizner, Israel ;
Mashiach, Reuven ;
Bardin, Ron ;
Ben-Haroush, Avi .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2009, 28 (05) :617-629
[18]   Ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight at term: An evaluation of eight formulae [J].
Mirghani, HM ;
Weerasinghe, S ;
Ezimokhai, M ;
Smith, JR .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2005, 31 (05) :409-413
[19]   Ultrasonographic prediction of term birth weight: How accurate is it? [J].
Nahum, GG ;
Stanislaw, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (02) :566-574
[20]  
Nahum GG, 2002, J REPROD MED, V47, P752