Association Between Recurrent Fracture Risk and Implementation of Fracture Liaison Services in Four Swedish Hospitals: A Cohort Study

被引:54
作者
Axelsson, Kristian F. [1 ,2 ]
Johansson, Helena [3 ]
Lundh, Dan [4 ]
Moller, Michael [5 ,6 ]
Lorentzon, Mattias [2 ,3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Skaraborg Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Skovde, Region Vastra G, Sweden
[2] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Med, Geriatr Med, Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Australian Catholic Univ, Mary McKillop Inst Hlth Res, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Jonkoping Univ, Sch Hlth & Welf, Dept Nat Sci & Biomed, Jonkoping, Sweden
[5] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Gothenburg, Region Vastra G, Sweden
[6] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Clin Sci, Gothenburg, Sweden
[7] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Geriatr Med, Molndal, Region Vastra G, Sweden
关键词
FRACTURE; FRACTURE LIAISON SERVICE; OSTEOPOROSIS; RECURRENT FRACTURE;
D O I
10.1002/jbmr.3990
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Structured secondary preventions programs, called fracture liaison services (FLSs), increase the rate of evaluation with bone densitometry and use of osteoporosis medication after fracture. However, the evidence regarding the effect on the risk of recurrent fracture is insufficient. The aim of this study was to investigate if implementation of FLS was associated with reduced risk of recurrent fractures. In this retrospective cohort study, electronic health records during 2012 to 2017 were used to identify a total of 21,083 patients from four hospitals in Western Sweden, two with FLS (n= 15,449) and two without (n= 5634). All patients aged 50 years or older (mean age 73.9 [SD 12.4] years, 76% women) with a major osteoporotic index fracture (hip, clinical spine, humerus, radius, and pelvis) were included. The primary outcome was recurrent major osteoporotic fracture. All patients with an index fracture during the FLS period (n= 13,946) were compared with all patients in the period before FLS implementation (n= 7137) in an intention-to-treat analysis. Time periods corresponding to the FLS hospitals were used for the non-FLS hospitals. In the hospitals with FLSs, there were 1247 recurrent fractures during a median follow-up time of 2.2 years (range 0-6 years). In an unadjusted Cox model, the risk of recurrent fracture was 18% lower in the FLS period compared with the control period (hazard ratio = 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-0.92,p= .001), corresponding to a 3-year number needed to screen of 61, and did not change after adjustment for clinical risk factors. In the hospitals without FLSs, no change in recurrent fracture rate was observed. Treatment decisions were made according to the Swedish treatment guidelines. In conclusion, implementation of FLS was associated with a reduced risk of recurrent fracture, indicating that FLSs should be included routinely at hospitals treating fracture patients. (c) 2020 The Authors.Journal of Bone and Mineral Researchpublished by American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
引用
收藏
页码:1216 / 1223
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Capture the Fracture: a Best Practice Framework and global campaign to break the fragility fracture cycle [J].
Akesson, K. ;
Marsh, D. ;
Mitchell, P. J. ;
McLellan, A. R. ;
Stenmark, J. ;
Pierroz, D. D. ;
Kyer, C. ;
Cooper, C. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 24 (08) :2135-2152
[2]   Effectiveness of a minimal resource fracture liaison service [J].
Axelsson, K. F. ;
Jacobsson, R. ;
Lund, D. ;
Lorentzon, M. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 27 (11) :3165-3175
[3]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[4]   Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures [J].
Cummings, SR ;
Melton, LJ .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9319) :1761-1767
[5]   Osteoporosis Disease Management: The Role of the Orthopaedic Surgeon [J].
Dell, Richard ;
Greene, Denise ;
Schelkun, Steven R. ;
Williams, Kathy .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2008, 90A :188-194
[6]   A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk [J].
Fine, JP ;
Gray, RJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 94 (446) :496-509
[7]   Models of care for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Ganda, K. ;
Puech, M. ;
Chen, J. S. ;
Speerin, R. ;
Bleasel, J. ;
Center, J. R. ;
Eisman, J. A. ;
March, L. ;
Seibel, M. J. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 24 (02) :393-406
[8]   Evaluation of a program of integrated care to reduce recurrent osteoporotic fractures [J].
Goltz, Lisa ;
Degenhardt, Gabriel ;
Maywald, Ulf ;
Kirch, Wilhelm ;
Schindler, Christoph .
PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2013, 22 (03) :263-270
[9]  
Huntjens Kirsten M B, 2014, J Bone Joint Surg Am, V96, pe29, DOI 10.2106/JBJS.L.00223
[10]   Imminent risk of fracture after fracture [J].
Johansson, H. ;
Siggeirsdottir, K. ;
Harvey, N. C. ;
Oden, A. ;
Gudnason, V. ;
McCloskey, E. ;
Sigurdsson, G. ;
Kanis, J. A. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 28 (03) :775-780