In Vivo Feasibility of Electrostatic Precipitation as an Adjunct to Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (ePIPAC)

被引:53
作者
Kakchekeeva, Tinatin [1 ]
Demtroeder, Cedric [2 ]
Herath, Nirmitha I. [3 ]
Griffiths, Dominic [4 ]
Torkington, Jared [5 ]
Solass, Wiebke [6 ]
Dutreix, Marie [7 ]
Reymond, Marc A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Otto von Guericke Univ, Dept Surg, Magdeburg, Germany
[2] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Marien Hosp Herne, Dept Surg, Herne, Germany
[3] DNA Therapeut, Evry, France
[4] Alesi Surg Ltd, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
[5] Welsh Inst Minimal Access Therapy, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
[6] Med Sch Hanover, Inst Pathol, Hannover, Germany
[7] Inst Curie, Orsay, France
关键词
PERITONEAL CARCINOMATOSIS; OVARIAN-CANCER; SURGERY; PIPAC; PENETRATION; OBSTRUCTION; DOXORUBICIN; CISPLATIN; RECURRENT; FIBROSIS;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-016-5108-4
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy is limited by tissue penetration. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) has been shown to improve drug uptake by utilizing the physical properties of gas and pressure. This study investigated the effect of adding electrostatic precipitation to further enhance the pharmacologic properties of this technique. Methods. A comparative study was performed using an in vivo porcine model. There were 3 cases in each group, PIPAC and electrostatic precipitation pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (ePIPAC), plus 1 negative control comparing intraperitoneal distribution and tissue uptake of 2 tracer substances (toluidine blue and DT01). Tracer uptake was determined by measuring DT01 in tissue and peritoneal fluid at the end of each procedure. Results. Electrostatic precipitation of the aerosol was technically feasible in all ePIPAC animals. The aerosol was cleared completely from the visual field within 15 s in the ePIPAC group versus 30 min in the PIPAC group. The peritoneal surface was homogeneously stained in both groups. After 30 min, 1.5 % remaining DT01 was measured in samples of ePIPAC-treated peritoneal fluid versus 15 % in PIPAC animals (p = 0.01). Tissue concentration was increased after ePIPAC versus PIPAC (p = 0.06). Conclusions. ePIPAC is technically feasible and improves tissue uptake of 2 tracer substances compared to PIPAC by up to tenfold. Intraperitoneal distribution was homogeneous in both groups. ePIPAC has the potential to allow more efficient drug uptake, further dose reduction, a significant shortening of the time required for PIPAC application, and improved health and safety measures.
引用
收藏
页码:S592 / S598
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis (SEP) as a delayed complication of continuous hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion (CHPP): Report of a case [J].
Aihara, H ;
Maruoka, H ;
Kiyozaki, H ;
Konishi, F .
SURGERY TODAY, 2003, 33 (03) :232-236
[2]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[3]   Electrostatic precipitation is a novel way of maintaining visual field clarity during laparoscopic surgery: a prospective double-blind randomized controlled pilot study [J].
Ansell, James ;
Warren, Neil ;
Wall, Pete ;
Cocks, Kim ;
Goddard, Stuart ;
Whiston, Richard ;
Stechman, Michael ;
Scott-Coombes, David ;
Torkington, Jared .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 28 (07) :2057-2065
[4]   Renal and Hepatic Toxicities After Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) [J].
Blanco, Ana ;
Giger-Pabst, Urs ;
Solass, Wiebke ;
Zieren, Juergen ;
Reymond, Marc A. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (07) :2311-2316
[5]   Intraperitoneal therapy for peritoneal tumors: biophysics and clinical evidence [J].
Ceelen, Wim P. ;
Flessner, Michael F. .
NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 7 (02) :108-115
[6]   Peritoneal fibrosis leading to small bowel obstruction two years after first-line intraperitoneal chemotherapy for optimally debulked ovarian cancer [J].
Chan, Warren S. W. ;
Bohmer, Robert ;
McIntosh, Robert ;
Blomfield, Penelope .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 51 (01) :91-92
[7]   Inhibition of DNA damage repair by artificial activation of PARP with siDNA [J].
Croset, Amelie ;
Cordelieres, Fabrice P. ;
Berthault, Nathalie ;
Buhler, Cyril ;
Sun, Jian-Sheng ;
Quanz, Maria ;
Dutreix, Marie .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2013, 41 (15) :7344-7355
[8]   Pharmacokinetic problems in peritoneal drug administration: Tissue penetration and surface exposure [J].
Dedrick, RL ;
Flessner, MF .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1997, 89 (07) :480-487
[9]   Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with oxaliplatin in colorectal peritoneal metastasis [J].
Demtroeder, C. ;
Solass, W. ;
Zieren, J. ;
Strumberg, D. ;
Giger-Pabst, U. ;
Reymond, M. -A. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2016, 18 (04) :364-371
[10]   Modified selection criteria for complete cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC based on peritoneal cancer index and small bowel involvement for peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal origin [J].
Elias, D. ;
Mariani, A. ;
Cloutier, A. -S. ;
Blot, F. ;
Goere, D. ;
Dumont, F. ;
Honore, C. ;
Billard, V. ;
Dartigues, P. ;
Ducreux, M. .
EJSO, 2014, 40 (11) :1467-1473