The Language Learning Potential of Writing through EFL Students' Processing of Feedback

被引:0
作者
Nicolas Conesa, Florentina [1 ]
Roca de Larios, Julio [1 ]
Angeles Monteverde, Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Murcia, Murcia, Spain
关键词
written languaging; direct feedback; indirect feedback; language learning potential of writing; processing; WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK; FOREIGN-LANGUAGE; OUTPUT; TASK; ATTENTION; REVISION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study investigates the effects of low L2 proficiency students' processing of two feedback types (direct and indirect) during a written languaging session Of the accuracy of their rewritten texts. Data were collected during two weeks and were statistically analysed. The main findings showed that none of the two feedback groups reflected on and understood all the errors on which they received feedback, which in turn determined the accuracy of the rewritten texts. These results open a new window for the investigation of the effectiveness of different feedback types and the language learning potential of writing. The empirical and pedagogical implications of these findings are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 200
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Exploring the potential of second/foreign language writing for language learning: The effects of task factors and learner variables [J].
Ruiz-Funes, Marcela .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2015, 28 :1-19
[42]   Exploring the effectiveness of digital writing tools on Thai EFL students' writing [J].
Pitukwong, Kusuma ;
Saraiwang, Sasithida .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 16 (03)
[43]   EFL Students' Preferences for Written Corrective Feedback: Do Error Types, Language Proficiency, and Foreign Language Enjoyment Matter? [J].
Zhang, Tiefu ;
Chen, Xuemei ;
Hu, Jiehui ;
Ketwan, Pattarapon .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
[44]   Exploring online peer feedback and automated corrective feedback on EFL writing performance [J].
Shang, Hui-Fang .
INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2022, 30 (01) :4-16
[45]   The importance of seeking feedback for benefiting from feedback: A case of second language writing [J].
Papi, Mostafa ;
Tabari, Mahmoud Abdi ;
Sato, Masatoshi .
MODERN LANGUAGE JOURNAL, 2024, 108 (02) :489-512
[46]   Learner engagement with automated feedback, peer feedback and teacher feedback in an online EFL writing context [J].
Tian, Lili ;
Zhou, Yu .
SYSTEM, 2020, 91
[47]   EXPLORING EFFECTS OF ONLINE-TUTOR AND TEACHER-LED CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON EFL STUDENTS WRITING PERFORMANCE [J].
Tai, H. C. .
EDULEARN15: 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2015, :7075-7075
[48]   The impact of using machine translation on EFL students' writing [J].
Lee, Sangmin-Michelle .
COMPUTER ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2020, 33 (03) :157-175
[49]   Adapting EFL materials and its influences on Indonesia secondary school students' language learning [J].
Hanifa, Rizaldy ;
Yusuf, Fazri Nur ;
Yusra, Siti Rahimah ;
Suherdi, Didi .
ASIAN-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF SECOND AND FOREIGN LANGUAGE EDUCATION, 2024, 9 (01)
[50]   Effectiveness of Using Digital Feedback on EFL Student Writing Skills [J].
Hojeij, Zeina ;
Ayber, Pinar Ozdemir .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING AND TEACHING, 2022, 12 (01)