A comparative study of preference dominance-based approaches for selection of industrial robots

被引:14
作者
Chatterjee, P. [1 ]
Mondal, S. [2 ]
Chakraborty, S. [3 ]
机构
[1] MCKV Inst Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Howrah 711204, W Bengal, India
[2] Mallabhum Inst Technol, Dept Prod Engn, Bankura 722122, W Bengal, India
[3] Jadavpur Univ, Dept Prod Engn, Kolkata 700032, W Bengal, India
来源
ADVANCES IN PRODUCTION ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT | 2014年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
Industrial robot selection; Multi-attribute decision-making; EVAMIX; EXPROM2; Performance comparison; RANKING; DIGRAPH;
D O I
10.14743/apem2014.1.172
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In the modern era of highly mechanized technologies, manufacturing organizations are now extensively using different kinds of industrial robots for performing complicated and perilous tasks with superior levels of accuracy. The major role of robotic technology within manufacturing organizations is to amalgamate design, manufacturing and management planning activities into a flexible system for improving production lines with minimum manufacturing cost involvement. However, the pre-implementation, implementation, and post-implementation phases of robotic technologies are the foremost issues associated with the selection and rationalization of robotic investments, which is based on a thorough review and exploration of various alternative robots and their mutually conflicting performance measures. Evaluating alternative robots in the presence of multiple conflicting attributes often makes the selection task very complex. This paper focuses on the application feasibilities of two preference dominance-based multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) approaches, namely evaluation of mixed data (EVAMDC) and extended preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation II (EXPROM2) whilst selecting the best alternative robots within given manufacturing environments. Using these two methods, a list of all the feasible alternatives from the best to the worst suitable robot is obtained by taking into account different robot selection attributes. The ranking performances of these methods are also compared with those of the past researchers, using four performance tests. (C) 2014 PEI, University of Maribor. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 20
页数:16
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Selection of industrial robots using compromise ranking method [J].
Athawale, Vijay Manikrao ;
Chatterjee, Prasenjit ;
Chakraborty, Shankar .
International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2012, 11 (1-2) :3-15
[2]  
Athawale V.M., 2011, INT J OFINDUSTRIAL E, V2, P831, DOI [10.5267/j.ijiec.2011.05.002, DOI 10.5267/J.IJIEC.2011.05.002]
[3]  
Bahadir Mehmet Cagatay, 2012, Proceedings of the 3rd 2012 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, P674
[4]   Attribute based specification, comparison and selection of a robot [J].
Bhangale, PP ;
Agrawal, VP ;
Saha, SK .
MECHANISM AND MACHINE THEORY, 2004, 39 (12) :1345-1366
[5]  
Chatterjee P., 2014, International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, V5, P315, DOI [10.5267/j.ijiec.2013.10.002, DOI 10.5267/J.IJIEC.2013.10.002, DOI 10.5267/j.ijiec.2013.10.002]
[6]   Selection of industrial robots using compromise ranking and outranking methods [J].
Chatterjee, Prasenjit ;
Athawale, Vijay Manikrao ;
Chakraborty, Shankar .
ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER-INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2010, 26 (05) :483-489
[7]   Identification of Spatial Ranking of Hydrological Vulnerability Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Techniques: Case Study of Korea [J].
Chung, Eun-Sung ;
Lee, Kil Seong .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2009, 23 (12) :2395-2416
[8]  
Datta Saurav, 2013, Grey Systems: Theory and Application, V3, P201, DOI 10.1108/GS-05-2013-0008
[9]   Extension of VIKOR method in intuitionistic fuzzy environment for robot selection [J].
Devi, Kavita .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (11) :14163-14168
[10]   CARDINAL RANKING OF ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS - EXTENSION OF THE PROMETHEE METHOD [J].
DIAKOULAKI, D ;
KOUMOUTSOS, N .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1991, 53 (03) :337-347