Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer Affects Lymph Node Yield and Status Without Clear Implications on Outcome: The Case for Eliminating a Metric and Using Preoperative Staging to Guide Therapy

被引:21
作者
Abdel-Misih, Sherif R. Z. [1 ]
Wei, Lai [2 ]
Benson, Al B., III [3 ]
Cohen, Steven [4 ]
Lai, Lily [5 ]
Skibber, John [6 ]
Wilkinson, Neal [7 ]
Weiser, Martin [8 ]
Schrag, Deborah [9 ]
Bekaii-Saab, Tanios [10 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Div Surg Oncol, Wexner Med Ctr, Arthur G James Canc Hosp, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Ctr Biostat, Wexner Med Ctr, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Robert H Lurie Comprehens Canc Ctr, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Hematol Oncol, 7701 Burholme Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[5] City Hope Comprehens Canc Ctr, Duarte, CA USA
[6] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[7] Kalispell Reg Healthcare Specialists, Kalispell Reg Healthcare, Kalispell, MT USA
[8] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[9] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[10] Mayo Clin, Ctr Canc, Depaartment Med, Div Hematol Oncol, Phoenix, AZ USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK | 2016年 / 14卷 / 12期
关键词
COLON-CANCER; COLORECTAL-CANCER; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; NUMBER; SURVIVAL; IMPACT; CHEMORADIATION; CARCINOMA; RETRIEVAL; HARVEST;
D O I
10.6004/jnccn.2016.0164
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Nodal status has long been considered pivotal to oncologic care, staging, and management. This has resulted in the establishment of rudimentary metrics regarding adequate lymph node yield in colon and rectal cancers for accurate cancer staging. In the era of neoadjuvant treatment, the implications of lymph node yield and status on patient outcomes remains unclear. Patient and Methods: This study included 1,680 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer from the NCCN prospective oncology database stratified into 3 groups based on preoperative therapy received: no neoadjuvant therapy, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clinicopathologic characteristics and survival were compared between the groups, with univariate and multivariate analyses undertaken. Results: The clinicopathologic characteristics demonstrated statistically significant differences and heterogeneity among the 3 groups. The neoadjuvant chemoradiation group demonstrated the statistically lowest median lymph node yield (n=15) compared with 17 and 18 for no-neoadjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, respectively (P<.0001). Neoadjuvant treatment did impact survival, with chemoradiation demonstrating increased median overall survival of 42.7 compared with 37.3 and 26.6 months for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and noneoadjuvant therapy, respectively (P<.0001). Patients with a yield of fewer than 12 lymph nodes had improved median overall survival of 43.3 months compared with 36.6 months in patients with 12 or more lymph nodes (P=.009). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that neither node yield nor status were predictors for overall survival. Discussion: This analysis reiterates that nodal yield in rectal cancer is multifactorial, with neoadjuvant therapy being a significant factor. Node yield and status were not significant predictors of overall survival. A nodal metric may not be clinically relevant in the era of neoadjuvant therapy, and guidelines for perioperative therapy may need reconsideration.
引用
收藏
页码:1528 / 1534
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, V6th, P113
[2]   Impact of preoperative radiation for rectal cancer on subsequent lymph node evaluation: A population-based analysis [J].
Baxter, NN ;
Morris, AM ;
Rothenberger, DA ;
Tepper, JE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (02) :426-431
[3]   Lymph node evaluation in colorectal cancer patients: A population-based study [J].
Baxter, NN ;
Virnig, DJ ;
Rothenberger, DA ;
Morris, AM ;
Jessurun, J ;
Virnig, BA .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2005, 97 (03) :219-225
[4]  
Benson AB, NCCN CLIN PRACTICE G
[5]   Lymph node evaluation as a colon cancer quality measure: A national hospital report card [J].
Bilimoria, Karl Y. ;
Bentrem, David J. ;
Stewart, Andrew K. ;
Talamonti, Mark S. ;
Winchester, David P. ;
Russell, Thomas R. ;
Ko, Clifford Y. .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2008, 100 (18) :1310-1317
[6]   Fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: long-term results of the EORTC 22921 randomised study [J].
Bosset, Jean-Francois ;
Calais, Gilles ;
Mineur, Laurent ;
Maingon, Philippe ;
Stojanovic-Rundic, Suzana ;
Bensadoun, Rene-Jean ;
Bardet, Etienne ;
Beny, Alexander ;
Ollier, Jean-Claude ;
Bolla, Michel ;
Marchal, Dominique ;
Van Laethem, Jean-Luc ;
Klein, Vincent ;
Giralt, Jordi ;
Clavere, Pierre ;
Glanzmann, Christoph ;
Cellier, Patrice ;
Collette, Laurence .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2014, 15 (02) :184-190
[7]  
Cserni G, 2002, J SURG ONCOL, V81, P63
[8]   Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer Reduces Lymph Node Harvest in Proctectomy Specimens [J].
de la Fuente, Sebastian G. ;
Manson, Roberto J. ;
Ludwig, Kirk A. ;
Mantyh, Christopher R. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2009, 13 (02) :269-274
[9]   The impact of surgeon and pathologist on lymph node retrieval in colorectal cancer and its impact on survival for patients with Dukes' stage B disease [J].
Evans, M. D. ;
Barton, K. ;
Rees, A. ;
Stamatakis, J. D. ;
Karandikar, S. S. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2008, 10 (02) :157-164
[10]  
Fielding LP, 1991, J GASTROEN HEPATOL, V6, P35