Characterizing the Main Himalayan Thrust in the Garhwal Himalaya, India with receiver function CCP stacking

被引:217
作者
Caldwell, Warren B. [1 ]
Klemperer, Simon L. [1 ]
Lawrence, Jesse F. [1 ]
Rai, Shyam S. [2 ]
Ashish [3 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Natl Geophys Res Inst, Hyderabad 500007, Andhra Pradesh, India
[3] NAL Belur, CSIR, Ctr Math Modeling & Comp Simulat, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Himalaya; India; Garhwal; receiver functions; CCP stacking; CRUSTAL STRUCTURE BENEATH; 1999 CHAMOLI EARTHQUAKE; TECTONIC EVOLUTION; ELECTRICAL STRUCTURE; GRAVITY-ANOMALIES; LESSER HIMALAYA; TIBETAN PLATEAU; SOUTHERN TIBET; NEPAL HIMALAYA; COLLISION ZONE;
D O I
10.1016/j.epsl.2013.02.009
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
We use common conversion point (CCP) stacking of Ps receiver functions to image the crustal structure and Moho of the Garhwal Himalaya of India. Our seismic array of 21 broadband seismometers spanned the Himalayan thrust wedge at 79-80 degrees E, between the Main Frontal Thrust and the South Tibet Detachment, in 2005-2006. Our CCP image shows the Main Himalayan Thrust (MHT), the detachment at the base of the Himalayan thrust wedge, with a flat-ramp-flat geometry. Seismic impedance contrasts inferred from geologic cross-sections in Garhwal imply a negative impedance contrast (velocity decreasing downward) for the upper flat, located beneath the Lower Himalaya, and a positive impedance contrast (velocity increasing downward) for the ramp, located beneath the surface trace of the Munsiari Thrust (or MCT-I). At the lower flat, located beneath the Higher Himalaya, spatially coincident measurements of very high electrical conductivities require the presence of free fluids, and we infer a negative impedance contrast on the MHT caused by ponding of these fluids beneath the detachment. Our seismic image indicates that the upper flat of the MHT is similar to 10 km below sea level and dips north at similar to 2 degrees, connecting to a mid-crustal ramp which is similar to 10 km high and dips at similar to 16 degrees. The lower flat is 20-25 km below sea level and dips at similar to 4 degrees. The Main Central Thrust (MCT) appears as a negative impedance contrast, dipping at similar to 16 degrees. The Moho is nearly horizontal at 35-45 km depth beneath the Sub-Himalaya and Lower Himalaya, deepening to 50 km or more beneath the Higher Himalaya. This depth is 10-25 km shallower than in the NW Indian Himalaya and 5-10 km shallower than in central Nepal, requiring significant along-strike variations in crustal thickness. The observed thickness of subducted Indian crust in Garwhal is 20-28 km. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 27
页数:13
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Crustal structure of the Darjeeling-Sikkim Himalaya and southern Tibet [J].
Acton, C. E. ;
Priestley, K. ;
Mitra, S. ;
Gaur, V. K. .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 184 (02) :829-852
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, GEODYNAMICS
[3]   ORIGIN OF THE INVERTED METAMORPHISM OF THE LOWER HIMALAYAS, CENTRAL NEPAL [J].
ARITA, K .
TECTONOPHYSICS, 1983, 95 (1-2) :43-60
[4]  
Ashish, 2009, GEOPHYS J INT, V177, P1111, DOI [10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04112.x, 10.1111/J.1365-246X.2009.04112.x]
[5]  
Avouac, 2007, TREATISE GEOPHYS, V6, P377, DOI [10.1016/B978-044452748-6/00112-7, DOI 10.1016/B978-044452748-6.00112-7]
[6]   Mountain building, erosion, and the seismic cycle in the Nepal Himalaya [J].
Avouac, JP .
ADVANCES IN GEOPHYSICS, VOL 46, 2003, 46 :1-80
[7]   Modelling the spatial distribution of present-day deformation in Nepal: how cylindrical is the Main Himalayan Thrust in Nepal? [J].
Berger, A ;
Jouanne, F ;
Hassani, R ;
Mugnier, JL .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 156 (01) :94-114
[8]  
Bilham R, 2004, ANN GEOPHYS-ITALY, V47, P839
[9]   Earthquakes - Himalayan seismic hazard [J].
Bilham, R ;
Gaur, VK ;
Molnar, P .
SCIENCE, 2001, 293 (5534) :1442-1444
[10]   Mountain building in the Nepal Himalaya: Thermal and kinematic model [J].
Bollinger, L ;
Henry, P ;
Avouac, JP .
EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2006, 244 (1-2) :58-71