Gender Differences in Trunk and Pelvic Kinematics During Prolonged Ergometer Rowing in Adolescents

被引:20
作者
Ng, Leo [1 ]
Campbell, Amity [1 ]
Burnett, Angus [2 ]
O'Sullivan, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ Technol, Sch Physiotherapy, Curtin Hlth Innovat Res Inst, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Sports Sci & Phys Educ, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
spinal kinematics; sports; lumbar; thoracic; BACK-PAIN; 3-DIMENSIONAL MEASUREMENT; ERECTOR SPINAE; LUMBAR SPINE; BODY-MASS; ENDURANCE; PERFORMANCE; FATIGUE; FEMALE; INDEX;
D O I
10.1123/jab.29.2.180
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The trunk and pelvis kinematics of 20 healthy male and female adolescent rowers were recorded during an ergometer trial using an electromagnetic tracking system (Fastrak). The kinematics of each drive phase were collected during the 1st and 20th minute, respectively. The mean and range of the kinematics, stroke rate and stroke length were compared between genders and over time. Male rowers postured their pelvis with more posterior tilt and their thoracic spine in more flexion than female rowers (P < .05). Both genders postured their pelvis in more posterior pelvic rotation and upper trunk in more flexion over time. Male rowers were found to have a significantly shorter drive phase than female rowers (P = .001). Differences in trunk and pelvic kinematics between adolescent male and female rowers suggest potentially various mechanisms for biomechanical stress. Assessment and training of rowers should take gender differences into consideration.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 187
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   PHYSICAL MEASUREMENTS AS RISK INDICATORS FOR LOW-BACK TROUBLE OVER A ONE-YEAR PERIOD [J].
BIERINGSORENSEN, F .
SPINE, 1984, 9 (02) :106-119
[2]   PSYCHOPHYSICAL BASES OF PERCEIVED EXERTION [J].
BORG, GAV .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1982, 14 (05) :377-381
[3]  
Bridger R.S., 1992, Int. J. Ind. Ergon, V9, P235, DOI [10.1016/0169-8141(92)90017-T, DOI 10.1016/0169-8141(92)90017-T]
[4]   Three-dimensional measurement of lumbar spine kinematics for fast bowlers in cricket [J].
Burnett, AF ;
Barrett, CJ ;
Marshall, RN ;
Elliott, BC ;
Day, RE .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1998, 13 (08) :574-583
[5]   The effects of repetitive motion on lumbar flexion and erector spinae muscle activity in rowers [J].
Caldwell, JS ;
McNair, PJ ;
Williams, M .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2003, 18 (08) :704-711
[6]   Differences in sitting postures are associated with nonspecific chronic low back pain disorders when patients are subclassified [J].
Dankaerts, W ;
O'Sullivan, P ;
Burnett, A ;
Straker, LM .
SPINE, 2006, 31 (06) :698-704
[7]   A new approach to monitoring exercise training [J].
Foster, C ;
Florhaug, JA ;
Franklin, J ;
Gottschall, L ;
Hrovatin, LA ;
Parker, S ;
Doleshal, P ;
Dodge, C .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2001, 15 (01) :109-115
[8]   INFLUENCE OF SHORT HAMSTRING MUSCLES ON THE PELVIS AND LUMBAR SPINE IN STANDING AND DURING THE TOE-TOUCH TEST [J].
GAJDOSIK, RL ;
HATCHER, CK ;
WHITSELL, S .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1992, 7 (01) :38-42
[9]   Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) as an index of aerobic endurance during local and general exercises [J].
Garcin, M ;
Vautier, JF ;
Vandewalle, H ;
Monod, H .
ERGONOMICS, 1998, 41 (08) :1105-1114
[10]   Regional changes in spine posture at lift onset with changes in lift distance and lift style [J].
Gill, K. Peter ;
Bennett, Simon J. ;
Savelsbergh, Geert J. P. ;
van Dieen, Jaap H. .
SPINE, 2007, 32 (15) :1599-1604