Risk communication in a double public health crisis: the case of Ebola and cholera in Ghana

被引:5
作者
Thompson, Esi E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Media Sch, Franklin Hall,601 E Kirkwood Ave, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
Ebola; cholera; risk and crisis communication; risk perception; social amplification of risk; routines; Ghana; SOCIAL AMPLIFICATION; LAY JUDGMENTS; PERCEPTIONS; MEDIA; NEWS; EXPERT;
D O I
10.1080/13669877.2020.1819386
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
During 2014-2016 Ebola epidemic, many West African countries experienced perennial outbreaks of various infectious diseases. Given the geographic dynamics of disease outbreaks in the region, it seems obvious that research on risk communication needs to contemplate how these countries manage risk communication about simultaneously occurring infectious diseases. Yet, this is missing in risk communication scholarship. I draw on insights from the social amplification of risk framework to assess how three amplification stations responded to risk signals about proximate Ebola and cholera outbreaks in 2014 in Ghana. Based on in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with risk communicators, media workers, and community members, I argue that the differing individual and social experiences of Ebola and cholera in Ghana were shaped by historical, religious, socio-cultural, and institutional processing of risk signals, which guided judgements about risks. This study contributes to the literature on the social amplification of risk framework and risk and crisis communication by showing how the context of an impending crisis can lead to a health crisis for a preventable and treatable disease through the amplification and attenuation of risks signals. The study recommends the inclusion of lay people perspectives in the development of risk and crisis communication campaigns.
引用
收藏
页码:962 / 977
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Agbey G. M., 2016, THE DAILY GRAPHIC
[2]  
AMOAKOHENE MI, 2005, TOPICAL ISSUES COMMU
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014 and 2015. In the climate of chaos and fear surrounding the deadly epidemic, Fambul Tok
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, AM J EPIDEMIOL INFEC
[5]   The end of risk communication as we know it [J].
Arvai, Joseph .
JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2014, 17 (10) :1245-1249
[6]  
Binder A. R., 2015, SAGE HDB RISK COMMUN, V69
[7]   Interpersonal Amplification of Risk? Citizen Discussions and Their Impact on Perceptions of Risks and Benefits of a Biological Research Facility [J].
Binder, Andrew R. ;
Scheufele, Dietram A. ;
Brossard, Dominique ;
Gunther, Albert C. .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2011, 31 (02) :324-334
[8]   Did public risk perspectives of mad cow disease reflect media representations and actual outcomes? [J].
Boyd, Amanda D. ;
Jardine, Cynthia G. .
JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2011, 14 (05) :615-630
[9]  
Braun V., 2006, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, DOI 10.1080/10875549.2021.1929659]
[10]   Risk perceptions and their relation to risk behavior [J].
Brewer, NT ;
Weinstein, ND ;
Cuite, CL ;
Herrington, JE .
ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2004, 27 (02) :125-130