An assessment of cumulus parameterization schemes in the short range prediction of rainfall during the onset phase of the Indian Southwest Monsoon using MM5 Model

被引:11
作者
Dodla, Venkata Bhaskar Rao [1 ]
Ratna, Satyaban Bishoyi [2 ]
Desamsetti, Srinivas [2 ]
机构
[1] Jackson State Univ, Trent Lott Geospatial & Visualizat Res Ctr, Jackson, MS 39217 USA
[2] Andhra Univ, Dept Meteorol & Oceanog, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India
关键词
Rainfall; Indian southwest monsoon; MM5; model; Cumulus parameterization; MESOSCALE MODEL; SUMMER MONSOON; BOUNDARY-LAYER; CONVECTIVE PARAMETERIZATION; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; TROPICAL CYCLONES; SENSITIVITY; FORECAST; IMPACT; REGION;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.09.002
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The performance of cumulus parameterization schemes in the short range prediction of rainfall during onset phase of the Indian Southwest Monsoon (ISM) was evaluated using Fifth-Generation Pennsylvania State University / National Center for Atmospheric Research Mesoscale Model (MM5). MM5 model was used to predict rainfall at 30 km resolution up to 72 h over the Indian subcontinent for each day during the period 1-30 June 2002, which corresponds to the onset phase of the ISM. Experiments were performed with 5 different cumulus parameterization schemes of Anthes-Kuo (AK), Grell (GR), Betts-Miller (BM), Kain-Fritsch (KF) and Kain-Fritsch2 (KF2). Rainfall prediction assessment was made over five zones through comparison with corresponding APHRODITE gridded precipitation data and for selected location with station observations by analyzing the statistical parameters of correlation coefficient, mean absolute error and Hanssen-Kuipers score. Monthly mean zone-wise rainfall was well predicted by GR and AK schemes up to 48 hours and slight overestimation beyond. GR scheme predicted higher rainfall over west coast, central parts of India and low rainfall over southeast peninsula. BM and KF schemes showed overestimation with prediction of rainfall over dry southeast peninsula. All the schemes underestimated the coefficient of variability (CV) over all the five zones. AK and GR schemes had the mean and CV nearer to the APHRODITE observations, with AK scheme slightly better than GR scheme over Zones 1, 2 and 3 while GR scheme had the best agreement over Zones 4 and 5. GR scheme had also shown higher CC values and lower MAE over most of the zones up to 72 h, while BM had the least predictability with lower CC and HK scores and higher MAE over most of the zones. Over Western Ghats, the uncertainty limits could be higher than shown due to dominant heavy rains. Of the ten stations selected for verification. GR scheme had shown better prediction with significant positive CC values at nine of the ten stations and consistently lower MAE values and higher HK scores. Further analysis has shown that GR scheme predicted higher grid-scale and nighttime rainfall agreeing with earlier studies concerning monsoon rainfall. All other schemes predicted the features contrarily with higher convective and daytime rainfall. GR scheme alone was found to have provided the best prediction considering the mean monthly, daily zone-wise and station rainfall predictions. The present study concludes that GR cumulus parameterization scheme is the most suitable at 30 km resolution. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 267
页数:19
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   THE ONSET OF THE SOUTHWEST MONSOON OVER KERALA - 1901-1980 [J].
ANANTHAKRISHNAN, R ;
SOMAN, MK .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 1988, 8 (03) :283-296
[2]  
[Anonymous], MAUSAM
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, DESCRIPTION 5 GENERA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, STAT METHODS ATMOSPH
[5]  
ANTHES RA, 1977, MON WEATHER REV, V105, P270, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1977)105<0270:ACPSUA>2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]   Mesoscale model forecast verification during monsoon 2008 [J].
Ashrit, Raghavendra ;
Mohandas, Saji .
JOURNAL OF EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE, 2010, 119 (04) :417-446
[8]   Diurnal variation in precipitation over India during the summer monsoon season: Observed and model predicted [J].
Basu, B. K. .
MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2007, 135 (06) :2155-2167
[9]  
BETTS AK, 1986, Q J ROY METEOR SOC, V112, P693, DOI 10.1256/smsqj.47307
[10]  
Bhaskar Rao D.V., 2005, MAUSAM, V56, P121