Improving dosimetric outcome for hippocampus and cochlea sparing whole brain radiotherapy using spot-scanning proton arc therapy

被引:45
作者
Ding, Xuanfeng [1 ]
Zhou, Jun [1 ]
Li, Xiaoqiang [1 ]
Blas, Kevin [1 ]
Liu, Gang [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Wang, Yinan [1 ]
Qin, An [1 ]
Chinnaiyan, Prakash [1 ]
Yan, Di [1 ]
Stevens, Craig [1 ]
Grills, Inga [1 ]
Kabolizadeh, Peyman [1 ]
机构
[1] Beaumont Hlth, Dept Radiat Oncol, Proton Beam Therapy Ctr, Royal Oak, MI 48704 USA
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Union Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Canc Ctr, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Univ, Key Lab Artificial Micro & Nanostruct, Minist Educ, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[4] Wuhan Univ, Ctr Elect Microscopy, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[5] Wuhan Univ, Dept Phys, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
RADIATION-THERAPY; CANCER; OPTIMIZATION; IRRADIATION; COLLIMATION; AVOIDANCE; IMPACT; ROBUST; BOOST;
D O I
10.1080/0284186X.2018.1555374
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Recently, there have been significant interests towards whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with hippocampal and cochlea sparing. Herein, we present a novel robust, continuous and delivery-efficient spot-scanning proton arc therapy technique (SPArc) to improve such dosimetric outcome. Material and methods: Eight patients were selected for whole brain radiotherapy to evaluate the feasibility of using SPArc for hippocampal and cochlea sparing. Both SPArc and robust optimized Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy(ro-IMPT) plans were generated using the robust optimization of +/- 3.5% range and 3 mm setup uncertainties and were compared to the Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy(VMAT). Root-mean-square deviation doses(RMSDs) Volume Histogram, or RVH, was used for proton plan robustness evaluation. Proton plan delivery time was calculated based on a using full gantry rotation with 1 RPM, 2 ms spot switching time, minimum monitor unit per spot = 0.01, and simulate different proton system with energy-layer-switching-time(ELST) from 0.2 to 5 s. Results: SPArc plans showed significant dosimetric improvements in multiple dosimetric parameters. The mean dose to the hippocampus was reduced to 6.20 Gy [RBE] compared to VMAT 10.89 Gy [RBE] (p < .001) and ro-IMPT 9.38 Gy [RBE] (p < .001); D100% to the hippocampus was reduced to 4.50 Gy [RBE] compared to VMAT 9.16 Gy [RBE] (p = .001) and ro-IMPT 7.02 Gy [RBE] (p = .002); cochlear mean dose was reduced to 7.75 Gy [RBE] compared to VMAT 11.52 Gy [RBE] (p = .018) and ro-IMPT 10.15 Gy [RBE] (p = .037); and maximum dose was reduced to 33.84 Gy [RBE] compared to ro-IMPT 36.37 Gy [RBE]. RVH analysis shows SPArc is more robust in Organs-at-risk(OARs) sparing such as hippocampus, cochlea, lens, and eyes. The average total estimated treatment delivery time were 412 s, 627 s, and 1694 s using ELST of 0.2 s, 1 s, and 5 s for SPArc plans, respectively, compared with values of 547 s (p < .001), 626 s (p = .484), and 1025 s (p = .002) for ro-IMPT plans. Conclusion: SPArc could significantly reduce the dose delivered to the hippocampus and cochlea in patients being treated with WBRT. In addition, SPArc plans could potentially achieve similar or faster delivery time in modern proton machine with ELST of less than 1 s.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 490
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] BAYER SA, 1982, EXP BRAIN RES, V46, P315
  • [2] RADIATION THERAPY AND HEARING LOSS
    Bhandare, Niranjan
    Jackson, Andrew
    Eisbruch, Avraham
    Pan, Charlie C.
    Flickinger, John C.
    Antonelli, Patrick
    Mendenhall, William M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 76 (03): : S50 - S57
  • [3] Hippocampal sparing radiotherapy for pediatric medulloblastoma: impact of treatment margins and treatment technique
    Brodin, N. Patrik
    af Rosenschold, Per Munck
    Blomstrand, Malin
    Kiil-Berthlesen, Anne
    Hollensen, Christian
    Vogelius, Ivan R.
    Lannering, Birgitta
    Bentzen, Soren M.
    Bjork-Eriksson, Thomas
    [J]. NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2014, 16 (04) : 594 - 602
  • [4] Proton energy optimization and reduction for intensity-modulated proton therapy
    Cao, Wenhua
    Lim, Gino
    Liao, Li
    Li, Yupeng
    Jiang, Shengpeng
    Li, Xiaoqiang
    Li, Heng
    Suzuki, Kazumichi
    Zhu, X. Ronald
    Gomez, Daniel
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2014, 59 (21) : 6341 - 6354
  • [5] A Monte Carlo study on the collimation of pencil beam scanning proton therapy beams
    Charlwood, Frances C.
    Aitkenhead, Adam H.
    Mackay, Ranald I.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (03) : 1462 - 1472
  • [6] Chin L. S., 2010, Principles and Practice of Stereotactic Radiosurgery
  • [7] Ding X, 2017, 2017 23 INT C AUT CO, P1
  • [8] Redefine the role of range shifter in treating bilateral head and neck cancer in the era of Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy
    Ding, Xuanfeng
    Li, Xiaoqiang
    Qin, An
    Zhou, Jun
    Yan, Di
    Chen, Peter
    Prakash, Chinnaiyan
    Stevens, Craig
    Deraniyagala, Rohan
    Kabolizadeh, Peyman
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (05): : 749 - 755
  • [9] Spot-Scanning Proton Arc (SPArc) Therapy: The First Robust and Delivery-Efficient Spot-Scanning Proton Arc Therapy
    Ding, Xuanfeng
    Li, Xiaoqiang
    Zhang, J. Michele
    Kabolizadeh, Peyman
    Stevens, Craig
    Yan, Di
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (05): : 1107 - 1116
  • [10] Comparison of proton therapy techniques for treatment of the whole brain as a component of craniospinal radiation
    Dinh, Jeffrey
    Stoker, Joshua
    Georges, Rola H.
    Sahoo, Narayan
    Zhu, X. Ronald
    Rath, Smruti
    Mahajan, Anita
    Grosshans, David R.
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8