Adaptation to invisible motion results in low-level but not high-level aftereffects

被引:60
作者
Maruya, Kazushi [1 ,2 ]
Watanabe, Hiroki [3 ,4 ]
Watanabe, Masataka [3 ]
机构
[1] Jikei Univ, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Nishi Shinbashi, Japan
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Psychol, Nashville, TN USA
[3] Univ Tokyo, Dept Engn, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Univ Tokyo, Dept Math Informat, Tokyo, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
adaptation; motion aftereffect; binocular suppression; visual awareness;
D O I
10.1167/8.11.7
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
After prolonged exposure to moving stimuli, illusory motion is perceived in stimuli that do not contain consistent motion, a phenomenon termed the motion aftereffect (MAE). In this study, we tested MAEs under binocular suppression that renders the motion adaptor invisible for the entire adaptation period. We developed a variant of the continuous. ash suppression method to reliably suppress target motion stimuli for durations longer than several tens of seconds. Here, we ask whether motion systems are functional in the absence of perception by measuring the MAE, a question difficult to address using binocular rivalry that accompanies a switch of percept between visible and invisible. Results show that both the MAEs with static and dynamic tests are attenuated with an invisible adaptor when the adaptor and the test stimulus are presented to the same eye. In contrast, when the test pattern was presented to the other eye, the dynamic MAE was observed in invisible adaptor conditions. These results indicate that low-level adaptation survives under total binocular suppression, a finding predicted by previous studies. In contrast, disappearance of interocular transfer in the dynamic MAE suggests that a high-level motion detector does not operate when the motion adaptor is rendered invisible.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   THE AFTEREFFECT OF SEEN MOTION - THE ROLE OF RETINAL STIMULATION AND OF EYE-MOVEMENTS [J].
ANSTIS, SM ;
GREGORY, RL .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1965, 17 (02) :173-174
[2]   DIFFERENCE OF SPATIAL-FREQUENCY SELECTIVITY BETWEEN STATIC AND FLICKER MOTION AFTEREFFECTS [J].
ASHIDA, H ;
OSAKA, N .
PERCEPTION, 1994, 23 (11) :1313-1320
[3]   Visual competition [J].
Blake, R ;
Logothetis, NK .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2002, 3 (01) :13-23
[4]   BINOCULAR RIVALRY SUPPRESSION - INSENSITIVE TO SPATIAL FREQUENCY AND ORIENTATION CHANGE [J].
BLAKE, R ;
FOX, R .
VISION RESEARCH, 1974, 14 (08) :687-692
[5]   Strength of early visual adaptation depends on visual awareness [J].
Blake, R ;
Tadin, D ;
Sobel, KV ;
Raissian, TA ;
Chong, SC .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2006, 103 (12) :4783-4788
[6]   SPATIAL-FREQUENCY SELECTIVE MECHANISMS UNDERLYING THE MOTION AFTEREFFECT [J].
CAMERON, EL ;
BAKER, CL ;
BOULTON, JC .
VISION RESEARCH, 1992, 32 (03) :561-568
[7]   A GROUP-TEST FOR ASSESSING HAND- AND EYE-DOMINANCE [J].
CROVITZ, HF ;
ZENER, K .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1962, 75 (02) :271-&
[8]   Independent aftereffects of attention and motion [J].
Culham, JC ;
Verstraten, FAJ ;
Ashida, H ;
Cavanagh, P .
NEURON, 2000, 28 (02) :607-615
[9]   Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways [J].
Fang, F ;
He, S .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 8 (10) :1380-1385
[10]   SOME OBSERVATIONS ON THE SPIRAL AFTEREFFECT [J].
GRIFFITH, BC ;
SPITZ, HH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1959, 72 (01) :139-140