Participatory work place intervention for stress prevention in primary health care. A randomized controlled trial

被引:19
作者
Arapovic-Johansson, Bozana [1 ]
Wahlin, Charlotte [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hagberg, Jan [1 ]
Kwak, Lydia [1 ]
Bjorklund, Christina [1 ]
Jensen, Irene [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Inst Environm Med, Unit Intervent & Implementat Res Worker Hlth, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Linkoping Univ, Occupat & Environm Med Ctr, Linkoping, Sweden
[3] Linkoping Univ, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Linkoping, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Stress prevention; randomized controlled trial; demand-control; effort-reward; ProMES; EFFORT-REWARD IMBALANCE; WELL-BEING INTERVENTIONS; HOSPITAL ANXIETY; MENTAL-HEALTH; JOB-STRESS; DEPRESSION; ENVIRONMENT; PERFORMANCE; BURNOUT; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1080/1359432X.2018.1431883
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to explore whether a participatory, organizational intervention can reduce work-related risk factors, and thereby prevent stress-related ill health. We build on the job demand-control and effort-reward imbalance models of stress. It is a two-armed randomized trial, with one primary health care unit receiving the intervention and a two-unit control group. Validated questionnaires for the assessment of psychosocial work environment and health were administered, at the baseline and at 6 and 12-month follow up. The primary outcome was job strain. Secondary outcomes were effort-reward imbalance, exhaustion, sleep, and recovery. Group-level objective data on workload and data about relevant processes during the study were continuously collected. The changes in the intervention group with regard to job strain, effort-reward imbalance, exhaustion, sleep and recovery were not statistically different from changes in the control group. For the non-exhausted employees though, reward was significantly higher at follow up compared to baseline, but only in the intervention group. An important piece of information is that the objective workload was statistically significantly higher in the intervention group throughout the study. Not all the components of the intervention were implemented as intended. Context and process information, such as objective data and implementation fidelity are necessary for a valid interpretation of the results.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 234
页数:16
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Psychosocial stress and impaired sleep [J].
Akerstedt, Torbjorn .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 2006, 32 (06) :493-501
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Labour Force Survey
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2003, The Breakthrough Series: IHI's Collaborative Model for Achieving Breakthrough Improvement
[4]  
Arbetsmiljoverket, 2016, WORK ENV 2015
[5]   Interventions to facilitate return to work in adults with adjustment disorders [J].
Arends, Iris ;
Bruinvels, David J. ;
Rebergen, David S. ;
Nieuwenhuijsen, Karen ;
Madan, Ira ;
Neumeyer-Gromen, Angela ;
Bultmann, Ute ;
Verbeek, Jos H. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (12)
[6]  
Aronsson G., 2003, International Journal of Stress Management, V10, P217, DOI [DOI 10.1037/1072-5245.10.3.217, 10.1037/1072-5245.10.3.217]
[7]  
Bauer G F., 2013, Salutogenic organizations and change: the concepts behind organizational health intervention research
[8]  
Bergström G, 2008, WORK, V31, P167
[9]   Process Evaluation for Organizational Stress and Well-Being Interventions: Implications for Theory, Method, and Practice [J].
Biron, Caroline ;
Karanika-Murray, Maria .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STRESS MANAGEMENT, 2014, 21 (01) :85-111
[10]   Realist randomised controlled trials: A new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions [J].
Bonell, Chris ;
Fletcher, Adam ;
Morton, Matthew ;
Lorenc, Theo ;
Moore, Laurence .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2012, 75 (12) :2299-2306