Potentials of high resolution magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography for preoperative local staging of colon cancer

被引:52
作者
Rollven, Erik [1 ,2 ]
Holm, Torbjorn [2 ,3 ]
Glimelius, Bengt [4 ,5 ]
Lorinc, Esther [5 ,6 ]
Blomqvist, Lennart [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Univ Hosp Solna, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Dept Mol Med & Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Univ Hosp Solna, Dept Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Uppsala Univ, Dept Radiol Oncol & Radiat Sci, Uppsala, Sweden
[5] Karolinska Inst, Dept Pathol & Oncol, Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Solna, Sweden
关键词
Colon cancer; staging; high resolution MRI; computed tomography; histopathology; neoadjuvant treatment; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; CT; ACCURACY; MESOCOLON;
D O I
10.1177/0284185113484018
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Preoperative identification of locally advanced colon cancer is of importance in order toproperly plan treatment. Purpose: To study high resolution T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus computed tomography (CT) for preoperative staging of colon cancer with surgery and histopathology as reference standard. Material and Methods: Twenty-eight patients with a total of 29 tumors were included. Patients were examined on a 1.5 T MR unit using a phased array body coil. T2 turbo spin-echo high resolution sequences were obtained in a coronal, transverse, and perpendicular plane to the long axis of the colon at the site of the tumor. Contrast-enhanced CT was performed using a protocol for metastasis staging. The examinations were independently evaluated by two gastrointestinal radiologists using criteria adapted to imaging for prediction of T-stage, N-stage, and extramural venous invasion. Based on the T-stage, tumors were divided in to locally advanced (T3cd-T4) and not locally advanced (T1-T3ab). Surgical and histopathological findings served as reference standard. Results: Using MRI, T-stage, N-stage, and extramural venous invasion were correctly predicted for each observer in 90% and 93%, 72% and 69%, and 82% and 78% of cases, respectively. With CT the corresponding results were 79% and 76%, 72% and 72%, 78% and 67%. For MRI inter-observer agreements (Kappa statistics) were 0.79, 0.10, and 0.76. For CT the corresponding results were 0.64, 0.66, and 0.22. Conclusion: Patients with locally advanced colon cancer, defined as tumor stage T3cd-T4, can be identified by both high resolution MRI and CT, even when CT is performed with a metastasis staging protocol. MRI may have an advantage, due to its high soft tissue discrimination, to identify certain prognostic factors such as T-stage and extramural venous invasion.
引用
收藏
页码:722 / 730
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Imaging Strategies for Rectal Cancer Initial Staging: Does Pelvic Computed Tomography Provide Significantly Additional Findings when High-resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging has Been Performed?
    Liu, Li-Yan
    Liu, Li-Heng
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2020, 16 (08) : 1029 - 1033
  • [32] Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Computed Tomography for Identification and Quantification of Intraventricular Hemorrhage
    Romanova, Anna L.
    Nemeth, Alexander J.
    Berman, Michael D.
    Guth, James C.
    Liotta, Eric M.
    Naidech, Andrew M.
    Maas, Matthew B.
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2014, 23 (08) : 2036 - 2040
  • [33] Accuracy of computed tomography in nodal staging of colon cancer patients
    Choi, Audrey H.
    Nelson, Rebecca A.
    Schoellhammer, Hans F.
    Cho, Won
    Ko, Michelle
    Arrington, Amanda
    Oxner, Christopher R.
    Fakih, Marwan
    Wong, Jimmie
    Sentovich, Stephen M.
    Garcia-Aguilar, Julio
    Kim, Joseph
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2015, 7 (07): : 116 - 122
  • [34] Preoperative mediastinal and hilar nodal staging with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: Which is better?
    Wu, Lian-Ming
    Xu, Jian-Rong
    Gu, Hai-Yan
    Hua, Jia
    Chen, Jie
    Zhang, Wei
    Haacke, E. Mark
    Hu, Jiani
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2012, 178 (01) : 304 - 314
  • [35] Silent brain metastasis in the initial staging of lung cancer:: Evaluation by computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging
    Escuin, Julio Sanchez de Cos
    Menna, Diego Masjoans
    Gonzalez, M. Agustin Sojo
    Quirantes, Jose Zamorano
    Vicente, Carlos Disdier
    Calvo, Maria Cristina Perez
    ARCHIVOS DE BRONCONEUMOLOGIA, 2007, 43 (07): : 386 - 391
  • [36] Magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging for breast cancer: Pros and contras
    Kuhl, C. K.
    Braun, M.
    RADIOLOGE, 2008, 48 (04): : 358 - 366
  • [37] State-of-the-art preoperative staging of gastric cancer by MDCT and magnetic resonance imaging
    Choi, Joon-Il
    Joo, Ijin
    Lee, Jeong Min
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (16) : 4546 - 4557
  • [38] Lung and large airway imaging: magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography
    Mark C. Liszewski
    Pierluigi Ciet
    Abbey J. Winant
    Edward Y. Lee
    Pediatric Radiology, 2022, 52 : 1814 - 1825
  • [39] Multimodal Imaging With Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Detect Extracapsular Extension in Head and Neck Cancer
    Sheppard, Sean C.
    Giger, Roland
    Bojaxhiu, Beat
    Sachpekidis, Christos
    Dammann, Florian
    Dettmer, Matthias S.
    Arnold, Andreas
    Wartenberg, Jan
    Nisa, Lluis
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2021, 131 (01) : E163 - E169
  • [40] The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the local staging of penile cancer
    Kayes, Oliver
    Minhas, Suks
    Allen, Clare
    Hare, Chris
    Freeman, Alex
    Ralph, David
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2007, 51 (05) : 1313 - 1319