Accuracy Assessment and Automation of Free Energy Calculations for Drug Design

被引:100
作者
Christ, Clara D. [1 ]
Fox, Thomas [1 ]
机构
[1] Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co KG, Dept Lead Identificat & Optimizat Support, D-88397 Biberach, Germany
关键词
GUEST BINDING AFFINITIES; PARTICLE MESH EWALD; URINARY PROTEIN-I; MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS; LIGAND-BINDING; EFFICIENT GENERATION; COMPUTER-PROGRAMS; AM1-BCC MODEL; AMBER; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1021/ci4004199
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
As the free energy of binding of a ligand to its target is one of the crucial optimization parameters in drug design, its accurate prediction is highly desirable. In the present study we have assessed the average accuracy of free energy calculations for a total of 92 ligands binding to five different targets. To make this study and future larger scale applications possible we automated the setup procedure. Starting from user defined binding modes, the procedure decides which ligands to connect via a perturbation based on maximum common substructure criteria and produces all necessary parameter files for free energy calculations in AMBER 11. For the systems investigated, errors due to insufficient sampling were found to be substantial in some cases whereas differences in estimators (thermodynamic integration (TI) versus multistate Bennett acceptance ratio (MBAR)) were found to be negligible. Analytical uncertainty estimates calculated from a single free energy calculation were found to be much smaller than the sample standard deviation obtained from two independent free energy calculations. Agreement with experiment was found to be system dependent ranging from excellent to mediocre (RMSE = [0.9, 8.2, 4.7, 5.7, 8.7] kJ/mol). When restricting analyses to free energy calculations with sample standard deviations below 1 kJ/mol agreement with experiment improved (RMSE = [0.8, 6.9, 1.8, 3.9, 5.6] kJ/mol).
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 120
页数:13
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2009, OECHEM VERS 1 7 2 4
  • [2] AQVIST J, 1990, J PHYS CHEM-US, V94, P8021, DOI 10.1021/j100384a009
  • [3] Molecular Recognition and Ligand Association
    Baron, Riccardo
    McCammon, J. Andrew
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, VOL 64, 2013, 64 : 151 - 175
  • [4] EFFICIENT ESTIMATION OF FREE-ENERGY DIFFERENCES FROM MONTE-CARLO DATA
    BENNETT, CH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1976, 22 (02) : 245 - 268
  • [5] MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS WITH COUPLING TO AN EXTERNAL BATH
    BERENDSEN, HJC
    POSTMA, JPM
    VANGUNSTEREN, WF
    DINOLA, A
    HAAK, JR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1984, 81 (08) : 3684 - 3690
  • [6] KNIME:: The Konstanz Information Miner
    Berthold, Michael R.
    Cebron, Nicolas
    Dill, Fabian
    Gabriel, Thomas R.
    Koetter, Tobias
    Meinl, Thorsten
    Ohl, Peter
    Sieb, Christoph
    Thiel, Kilian
    Wiswedel, Bernd
    [J]. DATA ANALYSIS, MACHINE LEARNING AND APPLICATIONS, 2008, : 319 - 326
  • [7] Case D.A., 2010, AMBER 11
  • [8] The Amber biomolecular simulation programs
    Case, DA
    Cheatham, TE
    Darden, T
    Gohlke, H
    Luo, R
    Merz, KM
    Onufriev, A
    Simmerling, C
    Wang, B
    Woods, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2005, 26 (16) : 1668 - 1688
  • [9] Alchemical free energy methods for drug discovery: progress and challenges
    Chodera, John D.
    Mobley, David L.
    Shirts, Michael R.
    Dixon, Richard W.
    Branson, Kim
    Pande, Vijay S.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (02) : 150 - 160
  • [10] Mining Electronic Laboratory Notebooks: Analysis, Retrosynthesis, and Reaction Based Enumeration
    Christ, Clara D.
    Zentgraf, Matthias
    Kriegl, Jan M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2012, 52 (07) : 1745 - 1756