Complication risk despite preventive endoscopic measures in patients undergoing endoscopic mucosal resection of large duodenal adenomas

被引:37
作者
Probst, Andreas [1 ]
Freund, Simone [1 ]
Neuhaus, Lukas [1 ]
Ebigbo, Alanna [1 ]
Braun, Georg [1 ]
Goelder, Stefan [1 ]
Weber, Tobias [1 ]
Maerkl, Bruno [2 ]
Anthuber, Matthias [3 ]
Messmann, Helmut [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Augsburg, Dept Gastroenterol, Stenglinstr 2, D-86156 Augsburg, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Augsburg, Inst Pathol, Augsburg, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Augsburg, Dept Gen Visceral & Transplantat Surg, Augsburg, Germany
关键词
LATERAL SPREADING LESIONS; SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION ESD; DELAYED PERFORATION; ADVERSE EVENTS; AMPULLARY; TUMORS; OUTCOMES; POLYPS; THERAPY; SUCCESS;
D O I
10.1055/a-1144-2767
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is the standard treatment of ampullary and nonampullary duodenal adenomas. EMR of large (10-29mm) and giant (>= 30mm) lesions carries a risk of complications such as delayed bleeding and perforation. Prospective data on duodenal EMR are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic procedures (clipping and coagulation of visible vessels) to prevent complications after EMR of large and giant lesions. Methods 110 patients with 118 adenomas (29 ampullary and 89 nonampullary) were included prospectively. Results 15 lesions were small (12.7%), 68 were large (57.6%), and 35 were giant (29.7%). Endoscopic prevention of delayed complications was performed in 81.4% (n=96) of all lesions and 94.3% (n=33) of giant lesions. Complete resection was achieved in 111 lesions (94.1%). Complications were 22 delayed bleedings (18.6%), 3 intraprocedural perforations (2.5%), 2 delayed perforations (1.7%), and 1 stricture (0.8%). Major complications were associated with lesions size >= 30mm (28.6% vs. 9.6%; P =0.02) and ampullary adenomas (27.6% vs. 11.2%; P =0.07). All minor bleeding and 75% of major bleeding episodes were treated endoscopically; 25% of major bleedings needed radiologic embolization. Two fatal courses were observed when delayed perforation occurred after EMR of giant lesions. Residual adenoma was detected in 20.4% at first follow-up. Conclusions EMR of giant duodenal neoplasia carries a substantial risk of major complications and recurrences. Resection technique and prevention of delayed complications need to be improved. Further measures should be evaluated in randomized studies.
引用
收藏
页码:847 / 855
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Sporadic nonampullary tubular adenoma of the duodenum: Prevalence and patients' characteristics [J].
Alkhatib, Amer A. .
TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 30 (01) :111-112
[2]   Management of duodenal polyps in the era of maximal interventional endoscopy and minimally invasive surgery: a surgical perspective [J].
Asbun, Horacio J. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 84 (04) :697-699
[3]   Prospective study of acute complication rates and associated risk factors in endoscopic therapy for duodenal adenomas [J].
Aschmoneit-Messer, Insa ;
Richl, Johannes ;
Pohl, Juergen ;
Ell, Christian ;
May, Andrea .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (07) :1823-1830
[4]   Update on the Paris classification of superficial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract [J].
Axon, A ;
Diebold, MD ;
Fujino, M ;
Fujita, R ;
Genta, RM ;
Gonvers, JJ ;
Guelrud, M ;
Inoue, H ;
Jung, M ;
Kashida, H ;
Kudo, S ;
Lambert, R ;
Lightdale, C ;
Nakamura, T ;
Neuhaus, H ;
Niwa, H ;
Ogoshi, K ;
Rey, JF ;
Riddell, R ;
Sasako, M ;
Shimoda, T ;
Suzuki, H ;
Tytgat, GNJ ;
Wang, K ;
Watanabe, H ;
Yamakawa, T ;
Yoshida, S .
ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 37 (06) :570-578
[5]   Endoscopic resection of sporadic duodenal adenomas: comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) techniques and the risks of late delayed bleeding [J].
Basford, Peter John ;
George, Regi ;
Nixon, Emma ;
Chaudhuri, Tehreem ;
Mead, Rob ;
Bhandari, Pradeep .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 28 (05) :1594-1600
[6]   The role of endoscopy in ampullary and duodenal adenomas [J].
Chathadi, Krishnavel V. ;
Khashab, Mouen A. ;
Acosta, Ruben D. ;
Chandrasekhara, Vinay ;
Eloubeidi, Mohamad A. ;
Faulx, Ashley L. ;
Fonkalsrud, Lisa ;
Lightdale, Jenifer R. ;
Saltzman, John R. ;
Shaukat, Aasma ;
Wang, Amy ;
Cash, Brooks D. ;
DeWitt, John M. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 82 (05) :773-781
[7]   A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop [J].
Cotton, Peter B. ;
Eisen, Glenn M. ;
Aabakken, Lars ;
Baron, Todd H. ;
Hutter, Matt M. ;
Jacobson, Brian C. ;
Mergener, Klaus ;
Nemcek, Albert, Jr. ;
Petersen, Bret T. ;
Petrini, John L. ;
Pike, Irving M. ;
Rabeneck, Linda ;
Romagnuolo, Joseph ;
Vargo, John J. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 71 (03) :446-454
[8]   Endoscopic tissue shielding with polyglycolic acid sheets, fibrin glue and clips to prevent delayed perforation after duodenal endoscopic resection [J].
Doyama, Hisashi ;
Tominaga, Kei ;
Yoshida, Naohiro ;
Takemura, Kenichi ;
Yamada, Shinya .
DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 26 :41-45
[9]   Success and complications of endoscopic removal of giant duodenal and ampullary polyps: a comparative series [J].
Eswaran, Sheila L. ;
Sanders, Michael ;
Bernadino, Kirk P. ;
Ansari, Asif ;
Lawrence, Christopher ;
Stefan, Andreas ;
Mattia, Anthony ;
Howell, Douglas A. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 64 (06) :925-932
[10]   Giant laterally spreading tumors of the duodenum: endoscopic resection outcomes, limitations, and caveats [J].
Fanning, Scott B. ;
Bourke, Michael J. ;
Williams, Stephen J. ;
Chung, Adrian ;
Kariyawasam, Viraj C. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (04) :805-812