共 12 条
Computational study of nozzle spray-line distribution effects on stratified mixture formation, combustion and emissions of a high compression ratio DISI methanol engine under lean-burn condition
被引:87
|作者:
Gong, Changming
[1
]
Zhang, Zilei
[2
,3
]
Sun, Jingzhen
[4
]
Chen, Yulin
[5
]
Liu, Fenghua
[1
]
机构:
[1] Dalian Minzu Univ, Coll Mech & Elect Engn, Dalian 116600, Peoples R China
[2] Bosch Automot Prod Suzhou Co Ltd, Suzhou 215000, Peoples R China
[3] Jilin Univ, State Key Lab Automot Simulat & Control, Changchun 130022, Peoples R China
[4] Chongqing Vehicle Test & Res Inst Co Ltd, Chongqing 401122, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Mech Engn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
来源:
基金:
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词:
Direct injection spark ignition methanol engine;
High compression ratio;
Nozzle spray-line distribution;
Stratified mixture formation;
Combustion;
Emissions;
EXHAUST-GAS RECIRCULATION;
NATURAL-GAS;
EQUIVALENCE RATIO;
CHARGE COMBUSTION;
INJECTION ENGINE;
PORT INJECTION;
FUEL;
GASOLINE;
PERFORMANCE;
HYDROGEN;
D O I:
10.1016/j.energy.2020.118080
中图分类号:
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
In this paper, five different spray-line distribution nozzles were designed to evaluate the effect of the nozzle spray-line distribution on stratified-charge combustion of methanol engine. Nozzle spray-line distribution characteristics, the stratified mixture formation, combustion and emissions of a high compression ratio direct-injection spark-ignition methanol engine for different spray-line distribution nozzles under lean-burn condition were numerically simulated. Simulation results showed that a nonuniform spray-line distribution nozzle of a 10-hole x 0.30 mm was conducive to form an ideal stratified mixture and obtain better combustion and engine performance. The maximum in-cylinder pressure of nozzle A was approximately 50.5% higher than that of nozzle E. The ignition delay and combustion duration of nozzle A were approximately both 20% lower than nozzle E. Nozzle A had lower unburned methanol, CO and soot emissions. The nozzle order of the highest NO emission was: A >> B > C> D > E. NO emission of nozzle A was approximately 13.6 times higher than that of nozzle E. According to the combustion and emission performance tradeoff, the nozzle order was: A>B>D>C> E. Nozzle A was preferred for actual spark ignition methanol engine applications. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文