Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis An Updated Systematic Review of the Accuracy of Diagnostic Tests

被引:98
作者
de Schepper, Evelien I. T. [1 ]
Overdevest, Gijsbert M. [2 ]
Suri, Pradeep [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Peul, Wilco C. [2 ]
Oei, Edwin H. G. [6 ]
Koes, Bart W. [1 ]
Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M. A. [1 ]
Luijsterburg, Pim A. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr, Erasmus MC, Dept Gen Practice, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, Leiden, Netherlands
[3] VA Boston Healthcare Syst, Dept Div Phys Med & Rehabil, Boston, MA USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Boston, MA USA
[5] Spaulding Rehabil Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Boston, MA USA
[6] Univ Med Ctr, Erasmus MC, Dept Radiol, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
lumbar spinal stenosis; diagnostic accuracy; systematic review; COMPUTER-ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; LOW-BACK-PAIN; SUPPORT TOOL; METRIZAMIDE MYELOGRAPHY; CLINICAL SCIENCES; DISK HERNIATION; CANAL STENOSIS; 1984; VOLVO; ULTRASOUND; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828935ac
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Systematic review of diagnostic studies. Objective. To update our previous systematic review on the diagnostic accuracy of tests used to diagnose lumbar spinal stenosis. Summary of Background Data. A wide range of clinical, radiological, and electrodiagnostic tests are used to diagnose lumbar spinal stenosis. An accurate diagnosis is vital, because lumbar spinal stenosis may require specific medical advice and treatment. Therefore, it is important to know the accuracy of these diagnostic tests currently available. Methods. A comprehensive literature search was conducted for original diagnostic studies on lumbar spinal stenosis, in which one or more diagnostic tests were evaluated with a reference standard, and diagnostic accuracy was reported or could be calculated. Our previous systematic review included studies up to March 2004; this review is current up to March 2011. Included studies were assessed for their methodological quality using the QUADAS tool. Study characteristics and reported diagnostic accuracy were extracted. Results. Twenty-two additional articles in addition to the 24 included in the previous review met the inclusion criteria. Combined, this resulted in 20 articles concerning imaging tests, 11 articles evaluating electrodiagnostic tests, and 15 articles evaluating clinical tests. Estimates of the diagnostic accuracy of the tests differed considerably. Conclusion. There is a need for a consensus on criteria to define and classify lumbar spinal stenosis. At present, the most promising imaging test for lumbar spinal stenosis is magnetic resonance imaging, avoiding myelography because of its invasiveness and lack of superior accuracy. Electrodiagnostic studies showed no superior accuracy for conventional electrodiagnostic testing compared with magnetic resonance imaging. These tests should be considered in the context of those presenting symptoms with the highest diagnostic value, including radiating leg pain that is exacerbated while standing up, the absence of pain when seated, the improvement of symptoms when bending forward, and a wide-based gait.
引用
收藏
页码:E469 / E481
页数:13
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Magnetic resonance Imaging and magnetic resonance myelography in the presurgical diagnosis of lumbar foraminal stenosis [J].
Aota, Yoichi ;
Niwa, Tetsu ;
Yoshikawa, Kohki ;
Fujiwara, Atsushi ;
Asada, Toshio ;
Saito, Tomoyuki .
SPINE, 2007, 32 (08) :896-903
[2]  
ARRAULT I, 1987, REV RHUM, V54, P627
[3]   Nerve Root Sedimentation Sign Evaluation of a New Radiological Sign in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis [J].
Barz, Thomas ;
Melloh, Markus ;
Staub, Lukas P. ;
Lord, Sarah J. ;
Lange, Joern ;
Roeder, Christoph P. ;
Theis, Jean-Claude ;
Merk, Harry R. .
SPINE, 2010, 35 (08) :892-897
[4]   1984 VOLVO AWARD IN CLINICAL SCIENCES - A STUDY OF COMPUTER-ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY .2. COMPARISON OF METRIZAMIDE MYELOGRAPHY AND COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF HERNIATED LUMBAR-DISK AND SPINAL STENOSIS [J].
BELL, GR ;
ROTHMAN, RH ;
BOOTH, RE ;
CUCKLER, JM ;
GARFIN, S ;
HERKOWITZ, H ;
SIMEONE, FA ;
DOLINSKAS, C ;
HAN, SS .
SPINE, 1984, 9 (06) :552-556
[5]   A COMPARISON OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY-MYELOGRAPHY, MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING, AND MYELOGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF HERNIATED NUCLEUS PULPOSUS AND SPINAL STENOSIS [J].
BISCHOFF, RJ ;
RODRIGUEZ, RP ;
GUPTA, K ;
RIGHI, A ;
DALTON, JE ;
WHITECLOUD, TS .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 1993, 6 (04) :289-295
[6]   ABNORMAL MAGNETIC-RESONANCE SCANS OF THE LUMBAR SPINE IN ASYMPTOMATIC SUBJECTS - A PROSPECTIVE INVESTIGATION [J].
BODEN, SD ;
DAVIS, DO ;
DINA, TS ;
PATRONAS, NJ ;
WIESEL, SW .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1990, 72A (03) :403-408
[7]   ROLE OF COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY AND MYELOGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF CENTRAL SPINAL STENOSIS [J].
BOLENDER, NF ;
SCHONSTROM, NSR ;
SPENGLER, DM .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1985, 67A (02) :240-246
[8]   THE DIAGNOSTIC-VALUE OF SELECTIVE LUMBAR NERVE ROOT SHEATH INFILTRATION [J].
CASTRO, WHM ;
VANAKKERVEEKEN, PF .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND IHRE GRENZGEBIETE, 1991, 129 (04) :374-379
[9]   Microsurgical Posterolateral Transmuscular Approach for Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis [J].
Chang, Han Soo ;
Zidan, Ihab ;
Fujisawa, Naoaki ;
Matsui, Toru .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2011, 24 (05) :302-307
[10]   Needle EMG has a lower false positive rate than MRI in asymptomatic older adults being evaluated for lumbar spinal stenosis [J].
Chiodo, Anthony ;
Haig, Andrew J. ;
Yamakawa, Karen S. J. ;
Quint, Douglas ;
Tong, Henry ;
Choksi, Vaishali R. .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 118 (04) :751-756