A Multidimensional Measure of Responsible Leadership: Integrating Strategy and Ethics

被引:36
作者
Agarwal, Swati [1 ]
Bhal, Kanika T. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Delhi, Delhi, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol Delhi, Planning, Delhi, India
[3] Indian Inst Technol Delhi, HR OB, Delhi, India
关键词
responsible leadership; construct validation; scale development; integrative leadership framework; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION; MANAGEMENT; STYLES; VALUES; KEY;
D O I
10.1177/1059601120930140
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Research on leadership generally discusses the normative and strategic perspectives of leadership separately. However, in the context of stakeholder theory and corporate sustainability, researchers and practitioners have called for the integration of these two seemingly disparate perspectives to create a hybrid leadership framework. In this regard, theoretical work on responsible leadership (RL) combines the disciplines of ethics and strategy to propose integrative behaviors. Nonetheless, RL mostly has been explored as a one-dimensional concept with stakeholder welfare as the focus. Although this aspect is salient, leaders must display other ethical and strategic behaviors to respond to the changing demands of business. Therefore, we combine such behaviors into one RL framework. Through a strategic lens, we define the first two dimensions of RL assustainable growth focusandmultistakeholder consideration. Furthermore, these goal-setting behaviors are looked upon as genuine when they depend on leaders' ethical behaviors. Therefore, we consider ethical leadership to be an inherent part of RL through the dimensions of themoral personandmoral manager. Across four quantitative studies, we test the construct validity of the suggested four-factor structure of RL as well as its ability to predict relevant organizational outcomes such as individual followers' moral courage and citizenship behaviors toward stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:637 / 673
页数:37
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   A meta-analytic review of authentic and transformational leadership: A test for redundancy [J].
Banks, George C. ;
McCauley, Kelly Davis ;
Gardner, William L. ;
Guler, Courtney E. .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2016, 27 (04) :634-652
[2]   Ethical leadership:: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing [J].
Brown, ME ;
Treviño, LK ;
Harrison, DA .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2005, 97 (02) :117-134
[3]   A BEHAVIORAL DECISION-THEORY APPROACH TO MODELING DYADIC TRUST IN SUPERIORS AND SUBORDINATES [J].
BUTLER, JK ;
CANTRELL, RS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1984, 55 (01) :19-28
[4]  
Byrne B, 2010, INTERNATIONAL HANDBOOK OF PSYCHOLOGY IN EDUCATION, P3
[5]   Responsible Leadership as Virtuous Leadership [J].
Cameron, Kim .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2011, 98 :25-35
[6]   WHY IS BUSINESS TALKING ABOUT ETHICS - REFLECTIONS ON FOREIGN CONVERSATIONS [J].
CIULLA, JB .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1991, 34 (01) :67-86
[7]  
Coyle-Shapiro JacquelineA-M., 2002, EUR J WORK ORGAN PSY, V11, P69, DOI [DOI 10.1080/13594320143000852, 10.1080/13594320143000852]
[8]  
Day D.V., 2012, The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology, V1, P696
[9]  
Dimitriades Zoe S., 2007, Employee Relations, V29, P469, DOI 10.1108/01425450710776290
[10]   RESPONSIBLE LEADERSHIP AND STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT: INFLUENCE PATHWAYS AND ORGANIZATIONAL OUTCOMES [J].
Doh, Jonathan P. ;
Quigley, Narda R. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2014, 28 (03) :255-274