Public Knowledge of and Attitudes Toward Genetics and Genetic Testing

被引:180
作者
Haga, Susanne B. [1 ]
Barry, William T. [1 ,2 ]
Mills, Rachel [1 ]
Ginsburg, Geoffrey S. [1 ,3 ]
Svetkey, Laura [4 ]
Sullivan, Jennifer [5 ]
Willard, Huntington F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Inst Genome Sci & Policy, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Sch Med, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Dept Med, Sch Med, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Div Nephrol, Sch Med, Dept Med, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[5] Duke Univ, Div Med Genet, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Durham, NC 27708 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
INFORMATION NONDISCRIMINATION ACT; FUNCTIONAL HEALTH LITERACY; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; COLORECTAL-CANCER; RISK; DISCRIMINATION; DISEASE; GENOME; BIOTECHNOLOGY; FAMILIES;
D O I
10.1089/gtmb.2012.0350
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Variable health literacy and genetic knowledge may pose significant challenges to engaging the general public in personal genomics, specifically with respect to promoting risk comprehension and healthy behaviors. Methods: We are conducting a multistage study of individual responses to genomic risk information for Type 2 diabetes mellitus. A total of 300 individuals were recruited from the general public in Durham, North Carolina: 60% self-identified as White; 70% female; and 65% have a college degree. As part of the baseline survey, we assessed genetic knowledge and attitudes toward genetic testing. Results: Scores of factual knowledge of genetics ranged from 50% to 100% (average = 84%), with significant differences in relation to racial groups, the education level, and age. Scores were significantly higher on questions pertaining to the inheritance and causes of disease (mean score 90%) compared to scientific questions (mean score 77.4%). Scores on the knowledge survey were significantly higher than scores from European populations. Participants' perceived knowledge of the social consequences of genetic testing was significantly lower than their perceived knowledge of the medical uses of testing. More than half agreed with the statement that testing may affect a person's ability to obtain health insurance (51.3%) and 16% were worried about the consequences of testing for chances of finding a job. Conclusions: Despite the relatively high educational status and genetic knowledge of the study population, we find an imbalance of knowledge between scientific and medical concepts related to genetics as well as between the medical applications and societal consequences of testing, suggesting that more effort is needed to present the benefits, risks, and limitations of genetic testing, particularly, at the social and personal levels, to ensure informed decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 335
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Australian Study on Public Knowledge of Human Genetics and Health
    Molster, C.
    Charles, T.
    Samanek, A.
    O'Leary, P.
    PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS, 2009, 12 (02) : 84 - 91
  • [22] Gendered contexts: Masculinity, knowledge, and attitudes toward biotechnology
    Simon, Richard M.
    PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2011, 20 (03) : 334 - 346
  • [23] Effects of Exposure to an Entertainment-Based Genetic Testing Narrative on Genetic Testing Knowledge, Attitudes and Counseling Discussion Intentions
    Hovick, Shelly R.
    Coduto, Kathryn
    Medero, Kristina
    Moyer-Guse, Emily
    Senter-Jamieson, Leigha
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2022, 27 (07) : 510 - 519
  • [24] Genetic Testing in Psychiatry: A Review of Attitudes and Beliefs
    Lawrence, Ryan E.
    Appelbaum, Paul S.
    PSYCHIATRY-INTERPERSONAL AND BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2011, 74 (04): : 315 - 331
  • [25] Genetic testing perspectives in Pakistani population: a survey on knowledge, attitudes, awareness, and concerns
    Uzair, Mohammad
    Fatima, Rida
    Rafiq, Shafia
    Jabeen, Maimoona
    Qaiser, Hammad
    Arshad, Muhammad
    Bashir, Shahid
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY GENETICS, 2024, 15 (06) : 631 - 640
  • [26] Attitudes toward genetic testing, family planning and preimplantation genetic testing in families with a germline CDKN2A pathogenic variant
    Onnekink, A. M.
    Klatte, D. C. F.
    van Hooft, J. E.
    van den Berg, S. H.
    van der Zwaan, S. M. S.
    van Doorn, R.
    Hinnen, S. C. H.
    Potjer, T. P.
    Bleiker, E. M. A.
    van Leerdam, M. E.
    FAMILIAL CANCER, 2024, 23 (03) : 255 - 265
  • [27] Attitudes toward the right to autonomous decision-making in psychiatric genetic testing: Controversial and context-dependent
    Strohmaier, Jana
    Witt, Stephanie H.
    Frank, Josef
    Lemme, Noemi
    Flatau, Laura
    Streit, Fabian
    Foo, Jerome C.
    Reitt, Markus
    Rujescu, Dan
    Schulze, Thomas G.
    Lanzerath, Dirk
    Illes, Franciska
    Degenhardt, Franziska
    Rietschel, Marcella
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART B-NEUROPSYCHIATRIC GENETICS, 2019, 180 (08) : 555 - 565
  • [28] Knowledge, experiences and attitudes concerning genetics among retinoblastoma survivors and parents
    Hill, Jessica A.
    Gedleh, Amal
    Lee, Siwon
    Hougham, Kaitlyn A.
    Dimaras, Helen
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2018, 26 (04) : 505 - 517
  • [29] Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Regarding Genetic Testing and Genetic Counselors in Jordan: A Population-Based Survey
    Ahram, Mamoun
    Soubani, Majd
    Abu Salem, Lana
    Saker, Haneen
    Ahmad, Muayyad
    JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2015, 24 (06) : 1001 - 1010
  • [30] Knowledge, attitudes and demand toward cardiovascular polygenic risk testing in clinical practice: cross-sectional survey of patients
    Brar, Shanjot
    Townsend, Jared
    Phulka, Joban
    Halperin, Laura
    Liew, Janet
    Parker, Jeremy
    Brunham, Liam R.
    Laksman, Zachary
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2024, : 531 - 537