Analysis of Robotic Performance Times to Improve Operative Efficiency

被引:53
作者
Geller, Elizabeth J. [1 ]
Lin, Feng-Chang [2 ]
Matthews, Catherine A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Div Female Pelv Med & Reconstruct Pelv Surg, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
Learning curve; Operative efficiency; Performance time; Robotic sacrocolpopexy; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; SACRAL COLPOPEXY; SACROCOLPOPEXY; REPAIR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2012.08.774
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Study Objective: To estimate the efficiency of procedural steps in robotic sacrocolpopexy and concomitant hysterectomy. Design: Retrospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). Setting: University hospital. Patients: One hundred forty-seven patients who underwent robotic-assisted procedures from November 2007 through December 2010. Interventions: Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. Sixty patients (40.8%) underwent concomitant hysterectomy; 37 (25.2%), mid-urethral sling placement; and 7 (4.8%), concomitant colporrhaphy. Measurements and Main Results: Comparison of the first 20 procedures with the subsequent 127 demonstrated that there was considerable improvement in time of cuff closure (p = .04); sacral dissection (p = .004); anterior (p = .006), posterior, (p = .003), and sacral (p = .003) mesh attachment; peritoneal closure (p < .001); total docked time (p = .02); and total incision time (p < .001). Conclusion: Robotic efficiency improves over a short learning period, with greatest differences in intracorporeal suturing and overall times. Identifying these steps may aid surgeons and learners in improving overall efficiency and establishing benchmarks for performance. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology (2013) 20, 43-48 (c) 2013 AAGL. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 48
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: Initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy [J].
Ahlering, TE ;
Skarecky, D ;
Lee, D ;
Clayman, RV .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (05) :1738-1741
[2]   Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy: technique and learning curve [J].
Akl, Mohamed N. ;
Long, Jaime B. ;
Giles, Dobie L. ;
Cornella, Jeffrey L. ;
Pettit, Paul D. ;
Chen, Anita H. ;
Magtibay, Paul M. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (10) :2390-2394
[3]   Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for female genital organ prolapse: establishment of a learning curve [J].
Akladios, Cherif Y. ;
Dautun, Daphne ;
Saussine, Christian ;
Baldauf, Jean Jaques ;
Mathelin, Carole ;
Wattiez, Arnaud .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2010, 149 (02) :218-221
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Int J Public Health, V53, P3
[5]   Implementation of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy-a single centre's experience [J].
Claerhout, Filip ;
Roovers, Jan Paul ;
Lewi, Paul ;
Verguts, Jasper ;
De Ridder, Dirk ;
Deprest, Jan .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2009, 20 (09) :1119-1125
[6]  
Cosson M, 2002, JSLS, V6, P115
[7]   Long-term success of abdominal sacral colpopexy using synthetic mesh [J].
Culligan, PJ ;
Murphy, M ;
Blackwell, L ;
Hammons, G ;
Graham, C ;
Heit, MH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 187 (06) :1473-1480
[8]   Pelvic Floor Function Before and After Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: One-Year Outcomes [J].
Geller, Elizabeth J. ;
Parnell, Brent A. ;
Dunivan, Gena C. .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 18 (03) :322-327
[9]   Robotic Surgical Training Program in Gynecology: How to Train Residents and Fellows [J].
Geller, Elizabeth J. ;
Schuler, Kevin M. ;
Boggess, John F. .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 18 (02) :224-229
[10]   Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women (Withdrawn Paper. 2007, art.no. CD004014) [J].
Maher, C. ;
Baessler, K. ;
Glazener, C. M. A. ;
Adams, E. J. ;
Hagen, S. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2007, (03)