Improvements in the StArt Tool to Better Support the Systematic Review Process

被引:98
作者
Fabbri, Sandra [1 ]
Silva, Cleiton [1 ]
Hernandes, Elis [1 ]
Octaviano, Fabio [2 ]
Di Thommazo, Andre [2 ]
Belgamo, Anderson [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Rod Washington Luis,Km 235, BR-13565905 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[2] Fed Inst Sao Paulo, Rod Washington Luis,Km 235, BR-13565905 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING 2016 (EASE '16) | 2016年
关键词
Systematic review; systematic literature review; evidence-based software engineering; StArt tool; tool support;
D O I
10.1145/2915970.2916013
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Context: Systematic Review (SR) is a methodology used to find and aggregate relevant existing evidence about a specific research topic of interest. It can be very time-consuming depending on the number of gathered studies that need to be analyzed by researchers. One of the relevant tools found in the literature and preliminarily evaluated by researchers of SRs is StArt, which supports the whole SR process. It has been downloaded by users from more than twenty countries. Objective: To present new features available in StArt to support SR activities. Method: Based on users' feedback and the literature, new features were implemented and are available in the tool, like the SCAS strategy, snowballing techniques, the frequency of keywords and a word cloud for search string refining, collaboration among reviewers, and the StArt online community. Results: The new features, according to users' positive feedback, make the tool more robust to support the conduct of SRs. Conclusion: StArt is a tool that has been continuously developed such that new features are often available to improve the support for the SR process. The StArt online community can improve the interaction among users, facilitating the identification of improvements and new useful features.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, GUIDELINES PERFORMIN
[2]  
[Anonymous], P 14 INT C ENT INF W
[3]  
[Anonymous], P 18 INT C EV ASS SO
[4]  
BIOLCHINI J, 2005, TECHNICAL REPORT
[5]  
Kitchenham BA, 2004, PROC INT CONF SOFTW, P273
[6]   A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering [J].
Kitchenham, Barbara ;
Brereton, Pearl .
INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 55 (12) :2049-2075
[7]  
Marshall Christopher, 2013, 2013 ACM / IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM), P296, DOI 10.1109/ESEM.2013.32
[8]   Semi-automatic selection of primary studies in systematic literature reviews: is it reasonable? [J].
Octaviano, Fabio R. ;
Felizardo, Katia R. ;
Maldonado, Jose C. ;
Fabbri, Sandra C. P. F. .
EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2015, 20 (06) :1898-1917
[9]   Guidelines for conducting systematic mapping studies in software engineering: An update [J].
Petersen, Kai ;
Vakkalanka, Sairam ;
Kuzniarz, Ludwik .
INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 64 :1-18
[10]  
Shadish WR, 2006, SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES: A PRACTICAL GUIDE, P125