Is RSBY India's platform to implementing universal hospital insurance?

被引:29
作者
Dror, David M. [1 ,2 ]
Vellakkal, Sukumar [3 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Inst Hlth Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Micro Insurance Acad, New Delhi, India
[3] Publ Hlth Fdn India, S Asia Network Chron Dis, New Delhi, India
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Below-poverty-line; Health insurance; Healthcare; India; non-BPL; RSBY; MANDATORY HEALTH-INSURANCE; COUNTRIES; COVERAGE; SCHEME; CARE;
D O I
10.4103/0971-5916.93425
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background & objectives: In 2008, India's Labour Ministry launched a hospital insurance scheme called Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) covering 'Below Poverty Line' (BPL) households. RSBY is implemented through insurance companies; premiums are subsidized by Union and States governments (75 : 25%). We examined RSBY's enrolment of BPL, costs vs. budgets and policy ramifications. Methods: Numbers of BPL are obtained by following criteria of two committees appointed for this task. District-specific premiums are weighted to obtain national average premiums. Using the BPL estimates and national premiums, we calculated overall expected costs of full roll-out of the RSBY per annum, and compared it to Union government budget allocations. Results: By March 31, 2011, RSBY enrolled about 27.8 per cent of the number of BPL households following the Tendulkar Committee estimates (37.6% following the Lakdawala Committee criteria). The average national weighted premium was (sic) 530 per household per year in 2011. The expected cost of premium to the union government of enrolling the entire BPL population in financial year (FY) 2010-11 would be (sic) 33.5 billion using Tendulkar count of BPL (or (sic) 24.6 billion following Lakdawala count), representing about 0.3 per cent (or 0.2%, respectively) of the total union budget. The RSBY budget allocation for FY 2010-11 was only about 0.037 per cent of the total union budget, sufficient to pay premiums of only 34 per cent of the BPL households enrolled by March 31, 2011. Interpretation & conclusions: RSBY could be the platform for universal health insurance when (1) the budget allocation will match the required funds for maintenance and expansion of the scheme; (it) the scheme would ensure that beneficiaries' rights are legally anchored; and (ii:) RSBY would attract large numbers of premium-paying (non-BPL) households.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 63
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Health spending in OECD countries in 2004: An update [J].
Anderson, Gerard F. ;
Frogner, Bianca K. ;
Reinhardt, Uwe E. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2007, 26 (05) :1481-1489
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, WORLD HLTH STAT 2010
[3]  
[Anonymous], IND UN HLTH INS SCH
[4]   Health financing for the poor produces promising short-term effects on utilization and out-of-pocket expenditure: evidence from Vietnam [J].
Axelson, Henrik ;
Sarah Bales ;
Pham Duc Minh ;
Ekman, Bjorn ;
Gerdtham, Ulf-G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2009, 8
[5]   One hundred and eighteen years of the German health insurance system:: are there any lessons for middle- and low-income countries? [J].
Bärnighausen, T ;
Sauerborn, R .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2002, 54 (10) :1559-1587
[6]  
Bauhoff S, 2011, HEALTH ECON, V20, P1281
[7]  
Busse R., 2004, Social Health Insurance systems in Western Europe
[8]   Universal coverage of health services: tailoring its implementation [J].
Carrin, Guy ;
Mathauer, Inke ;
Xu, Ke ;
Evans, David B. .
BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2008, 86 (11) :857-863
[9]  
Dror DM, 2008, INDIAN J MED RES, V127, P347
[10]   Reducing out-of-pocket expenditures to reduce poverty: a disaggregated analysis at rural-urban and state level in India [J].
Garg, Charu C. ;
Karan, Anup K. .
HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2009, 24 (02) :116-128