The economic impact of a patient navigator program to increase screening colonoscopy

被引:45
作者
Elkin, Elena B. [1 ]
Shapiro, Ephraim [2 ]
Snow, Jacqueline G.
Zauber, Ann G.
Krauskopf, Marian S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Hlth Outcomes Res Grp, New York, NY 10065 USA
[2] New York City Dept Hlth & Mental Hyg, Canc Prevent & Control Program, New York, NY USA
关键词
patient navigators; colonoscopy; cancer screening; cost-effectiveness analysis; cost-benefit analysis; COLORECTAL-CANCER; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; SURVEILLANCE;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.27595
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Patient navigation can increase colorectal cancer screening rates. The net economic impact of a colonoscopy patient navigator program was evaluated in an urban public hospital setting. METHODS: Cost, cost-effectiveness, and cost-benefit analyses were performed of a colonoscopy patient navigation program at 3 urban public hospitals in the period from 2003 to 2007. Program effectiveness was assessed in a 2-group, pre- and post-program, nonrandomized evaluation, comparing program hospitals with comparison hospitals that served similar populations. Costs were assessed from the provider's perspective. Outcomes included colonoscopy volume, colonoscopy completion rate, program cost, incremental cost-effectiveness, and net monetary benefit. RESULTS: Patient navigation was associated with a 61% increase in average monthly colonoscopy volume at program hospitals, from 114 procedures to 184 procedures, compared with a 12% increase at comparison hospitals. Adjusted for other factors, the navigator program increased colonoscopy volume by 44 to 67 additional procedures per month. Average program cost varied from $50 to $300 per patient referred to a navigator. Incremental cost-effectiveness varied from $200 to $700 per additional colonoscopy. At 2 hospitals, net revenue associated with increased colonoscopy volume exceeded the program cost per additional colonoscopy, yielding a net financial benefit; at the third hospital, the program yielded a net cost. Variation between hospitals in the program's economic impact was primarily attributable to differences in personnel costs. CONCLUSIONS: Economic evaluation of this colonoscopy patient navigator program in an urban public hospital setting suggests that such programs can be a cost-effective use of limited resources and yield a net financial benefit for providers. Cancer 2012. (c) 2012 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:5982 / 5988
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, COST EFFECTIVENESS H, DOI DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780195108248.001.0001
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Cancer Facts Figures 2010
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey data
[4]  
[Anonymous], CANC PREV EARL DET F
[5]   Productivity Costs of Cancer Mortality in the United States: 2000-2020 [J].
Bradley, Cathy J. ;
Yabroff, K. Robin ;
Dahman, Bassam ;
Feuer, Eric J. ;
Mariotto, Angela ;
Brown, Martin L. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2008, 100 (24) :1763-1770
[6]   A program to enhance completion of screening colonoscopy among urban minorities [J].
Chew, Lea Ann ;
Santos, Stephanie ;
Jandorf, Lina ;
Christie, Jennifer ;
Castillo, Anabella ;
Winke, Gary ;
Itzkowitz, Steven .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2008, 6 (04) :443-450
[7]  
Christie J, 2006, J NATL MED ASSOC, V98, P1095
[8]   Predictors of nonadherence to screening colonoscopy [J].
Denberg, TD ;
Melhado, TV ;
Coombes, JM ;
Beaty, BL ;
Berman, K ;
Byers, TE ;
Marcus, AC ;
Steiner, JF ;
Ahnen, DJ .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2005, 20 (11) :989-995
[9]   Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population [J].
Frazier, AL ;
Colditz, GA ;
Fuchs, CS ;
Kuntz, KM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 284 (15) :1954-1961
[10]  
Freeman H P, 1995, Cancer Pract, V3, P19