Comparing efficacy and side effects of a weekly intramuscular biogeneric/biosimilar interferon beta-1a with Avonex in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: A double blind randomized clinical trial

被引:13
|
作者
Nafissi, Shahriar [1 ]
Azimi, Amirreza [1 ]
Amini-Harandi, Ali [2 ]
Salami, Shiva [3 ]
Shahkarami, Mohammad Amir [3 ]
Heshmat, Ramin [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Dept Neurol, Tehran, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Dept Neurol, Tehran, Iran
[3] CinnoVex Collaborating Study Grp, Tehran, Iran
[4] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Endocrinol & Metab Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Interferon; Multiple sclerosis; Efficacy; Expanded Disability Status Scales; Clinical trials; Neutralizing antibodies; Biosimilarity; NEUTRALIZING ANTIBODIES; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; THERAPY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.02.039
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: We compared the efficacy and safety of two biosimilar forms of interferon beta-la in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: Avonex (Biogen Idec, USA) and CinnoVex (CinnaGen, Iran). Methods: In a double blind randomized clinical trial study 84 patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 0-5.5 were randomly allocated to two groups of 42 subjects. Results: Twenty-four patients lost to follow-up. Finally, 31 patients (mean +/- SD of age =33.7 +/- 7.0:7 males and 24 females) in the Avonex and 29 patients (mean +/- SD of age = 32.2 +/- 9.2; 8 males and 21 females) in the CinnoVex group completed full 24 months of study period. Decrease in EDSS was 1.05 +/- 0.24, p = 0.62 in the Avonex and 0.16 +/- 0.88, p = 1.0 in the CinnoVex group after 12 months and 0.27 +/- 1.05, p = 0.46 in the Avonex and 0.16 +/- 1.06, p = 1.0 in the CinnoVex group after 24 months. There was no statistically significant difference in attack number between two groups (1.0 +/- 1.2 in Avonex and 1.2 +/- 1.3 in CinnoVex; p = 0.46). Volume of T2-weighted lesions on MRI showed a progressive significant increase in the 12th month (28056 +/- 23693) in Avonex treated patients compared with first image (16353 +/- 11172) (p = 0.01). But number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions in CinnoVex showed statistically significant decrease after 12 months (0.08 +/- 0.28 vs. 1.00 +/- 1.22; p = 0.03). However, there were no significant differences between groups after 24 months. There were no significant differences between 2 groups regarding frequency and duration of most considerable side effects, as well. Neutralizing antibodies were not positive in any patients. Conclusion: CinnoVex can be used as a safe and effective alternative to Avonex in treatment of RRMS. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:986 / 989
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gender effects on intramuscular interferon beta-1a in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: analysis of 1406 patients
    Rudick, R. A.
    Kappos, L.
    Kinkel, R.
    Clanet, M.
    Phillips, J. T.
    Herndon, R. M.
    Sandrock, A. W.
    Munschauer, F. E., III
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2011, 17 (03) : 353 - 360
  • [2] Neutralizing antibodies in multiple sclerosis patients on weekly intramuscular Avonex and biosimilar interferon beta-1a (CinnoVex): Comparing results of measurements in two different laboratories
    Shahkarami, Mohammad Amir
    Vaziri, Behrouz
    Salami, Shiva
    Harandi, Ali Amini
    Oger, Joel
    JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS, 2013, 388 (1-2) : 46 - 48
  • [3] The effect of intramuscular interferon beta-1a on spinal cord volume in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
    Dupuy, Sheena L.
    Khalid, Fariha
    Healy, Brian C.
    Bakshi, Sonya
    Neema, Mohit
    Tauhid, Shahamat
    Bakshi, Rohit
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2016, 16
  • [4] A randomized double-blind trial of comparative efficacy and safety of Avonex and CinnoVex for treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
    Pakdaman, Hossein
    Abbasi, Mehdi
    Gharagozli, Koroush
    Ashrafi, Farzad
    Kasmaei, Hosein Delavar
    Harandi, Ali Amini
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 39 (12) : 2107 - 2113
  • [5] Long-term efficacy and safety of intramuscular interferon beta-1a: Randomized postmarketing trial of two dosing regimens in Japanese patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
    Saida, Takahiko
    Kira, Jun-ichi
    Ueno, Yasuhiro
    Harada, Naozumi
    Hirakata, Toshiyuki
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2016, 7 : 102 - 108
  • [6] The effect of intramuscular interferon beta-1a on spinal cord volume in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis
    Sheena L. Dupuy
    Fariha Khalid
    Brian C. Healy
    Sonya Bakshi
    Mohit Neema
    Shahamat Tauhid
    Rohit Bakshi
    BMC Medical Imaging, 16
  • [7] Efficacy and safety of peginterferon beta-1a compared to interferon beta-1a in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis patients: A phase 3, randomized, non-inferiority clinical trial (PEGINTEGRITY)
    Shaygannejad, Vahid
    Ashtari, Fereshteh
    Saeidi, Morteza
    Moghadam, Nahid Beladi
    Langroodi, Hamidreza Ghalyanchi
    Baghbanian, Seyed Mohammad
    Abolfazli, Roya
    Ghiasian, Masoud
    Ayromlou, Hormoz
    Asadollahzadeh, Elnaz
    Sabzvari, Araz
    Kafi, Hamidreza
    Saeen, Amirreza Azimi
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2024, 90
  • [8] Effect of intramuscular interferon beta-1a on gray matter atrophy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A retrospective analysis
    Fisher, E.
    Nakamura, K.
    Lee, J-C
    You, X.
    Sperling, B.
    Rudick, R. A.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2016, 22 (05) : 668 - 676
  • [9] Long-term clinical experience with weekly interferon beta-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis
    Coppola, G.
    Lanzillo, R.
    Florio, C.
    Orefice, G.
    Vivo, P.
    Ascione, S.
    Schiavone, V.
    Pagano, A.
    Vacca, G.
    De Michele, G.
    Morra, V. Brescia
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2006, 13 (09) : 1014 - 1021
  • [10] Oral interferon beta-1α in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis:: a double-blind randomized study
    Polman, C
    Barkhof, F
    Kappos, L
    Pozzilli, C
    Sandbrink, R
    Dahlke, F
    Jakobs, P
    Lorenz, A
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, 2003, 9 (04): : 342 - 348