LeFort I maxillary advancement: 3-year stability and risk factors for relapse

被引:50
作者
Dowling, PA
Espeland, L
Sandvik, L
Mobarak, KA
Hogevold, HE
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Dept Orthodont, Inst Clin Dent, N-0317 Oslo, Norway
[2] Trinity Coll Dublin, Dept Publ & Child Dent Hlth, Dublin, Ireland
[3] Univ Oslo, Fac Dent, Oslo, Norway
[4] Ullevaal Univ Hosp, Dept Maxillofacial Surg, Oslo, Norway
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.07.051
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The objectives of this retrospective cephalometric study were to assess the amount, direction, and timing of postoperative changes after LeFort I maxillary advancement, and to identify risk factors for skeletal relapse. Methods: The material was selected from the files at the Department of Orthodontics, University of Oslo, and comprised 43 patients who underwent 1-piece LeFort I advancement as the only surgical procedure from 1990 to 1998. All patients were followed for 3 years by using a strict data collection protocol. Lateral cephalograms were obtained before surgery and at 5 times after surgery. Results: A mean relapse of 18% of the surgical advancement occurred. In 14% of the patients, clinically significant skeletal relapse (>= 2 mm) was observed. Most (89%) postoperative change occurred during the first 6 months after surgery. Skeletal relapse increased significantly with degree of surgical advancement (P = .001) and degree of inferior repositioning of the anterior maxilla (P = .004) (linear regression analysis). At the end of follow-up, overjet and overbite were within clinically acceptable ranges for all patients. Conclusions: Maxillary advancement with a 1-piece LeFort I osteotomy is a relatively stable procedure. Identified risk factors for horizontal relapse were degree of surgical advancement and degree of inferior repositioning of anterior maxilla.
引用
收藏
页码:560 / 567
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
ARAUJO A, 1978, J ORAL SURG, V36, P849
[2]  
Bailey L J, 1994, Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg, V9, P163
[3]   QUANTITATION OF MAXILLARY REMODELING .2. MASKING OF REMODELING EFFECTS WHEN AN ANATOMICAL METHOD OF SUPERIMPOSITION IS USED IN THE ABSENCE OF METALLIC IMPLANTS [J].
BAUMRIND, S ;
KORN, EL ;
BENBASSAT, Y ;
WEST, EE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1987, 91 (06) :463-474
[4]  
BELL WH, 1981, J ORAL SURG, V39, P666
[5]  
BELL WH, 1975, J ORAL SURG, V33, P412
[6]   STABILITY OF THE LEFORT-I ONE-PIECE MAXILLARY OSTEOTOMY [J].
BISHARA, SE ;
CHU, GW ;
JAKOBSEN, JR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1988, 94 (03) :184-200
[7]   COMPARISONS OF POSTSURGICAL STABILITY OF THE LEFORT-I MAXILLARY IMPACTION AND MAXILLARY ADVANCEMENT [J].
BISHARA, SE ;
CHU, GW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1992, 102 (04) :335-341
[8]   Stability of Le Fort I osteotomy with advancement: A comparison of single maxillary surgery and a two-jaw procedure [J].
Bothur, S ;
Blomqvist, JE ;
Isaksson, S .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1998, 56 (09) :1029-1033
[9]  
BURSTONE CJ, 1978, J ORAL SURG, V36, P369
[10]   THE STABILITY OF SEGMENTALIZED LEFORT-I OSTEOTOMIES WITH MINIPLATE FIXATION IN PATIENTS WITH MAXILLARY HYPOPLASIA [J].
CHOW, J ;
HAGG, U ;
TIDEMAN, H .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1995, 53 (12) :1407-1412