LC method for the determination of R-timolol in S-timolol maleate: Validation of its ability to quantify and uncertainty assessment

被引:51
作者
Marini, RD
Chiap, P
Boulanger, B
Rudaz, S
Rozet, E
Crommen, J
Hubert, P
机构
[1] Univ Liege, CHU, Inst Pharm, Analyt Chem Lab, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
[2] Univ Liege, CHU, Inst Pharm, Dept Pharmaceut Analyt Chem, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
[3] Lilly Dev Ctr, Stat & Math Sci, B-1348 Mont St Guibert, Belgium
[4] Univ Geneva, Sch Pharmaceut Sci, EPGL, Lab Pharmaceut Analyt Chem, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
关键词
timolol maleate; R-timolol impurity; liquid chromatography; validation; accuracy profile; risk; uncertainty assessment;
D O I
10.1016/j.talanta.2005.07.026
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This article presents the validation results of a chiral liquid chromatographic (LC method previously developed for the quantitative determination of R-timolol in S-timoloi maleate samples. A novel validation strategy based on the accuracy profiles was used to select the most appropriate regression model, to assess the method accuracy within well defined acceptance limits and to determine the limits of quantitation as well as the concentration range. The validation phase was completed by the investigation of the risk profiles of various acceptable regression models in order to ensure the risk of obtaining the future measurements outside the acceptance limits fixed a priori. On the other hand, the present paper also shows how data used in this validation approach can be used to estimate the measurement uncertainty. The uncertainty derived from P-expectation tolerance interval (sigma-(2)(Tol)), which is equal to the uncertainty of measurements as well as the expanded uncertainty (U-x) using a coverage factor k = 2 was estimated. The uncertainty estimates obtained from validation data were finally compared with those obtained from interlaboratory and robustness studies. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1166 / 1175
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, ANALYST, V120, P2303
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Accuracy trueness and precision of measurement methods and results
[3]  
[Anonymous], STP PHARM PRATIQUES
[4]   An analysis of the SFSTP guide on validation of chromatographic bioanalytical methods: progresses and limitations [J].
Boulanger, B ;
Chiap, P ;
Dewe, W ;
Crommen, J ;
Hubert, P .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 2003, 32 (4-5) :753-765
[5]  
Box G.E.P., 1960, Technometrics, V2, P455, DOI [10.1080/00401706.1960.10489912, DOI 10.1080/00401706.1960.10489912]
[6]  
Chapuzet E., 1997, PHARM PRATIQUES, V7, P169
[7]  
*COUNC EUR, 2004, EUR PHARM, P2796
[8]   Measurement uncertainty from validation and duplicate analysis results in HPLC analysis of multivitamin preparations and nutrients with different galenic forms [J].
De Beer, JO ;
Baten, P ;
Nsengyumva, C ;
Smeyers-Verbeke, J .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 2003, 32 (4-5) :767-811
[9]   Determination of uncertainty in analytical measurements from collaborative study results on the analysis of a phenoxymethylpenicillin sample [J].
Dehouck, P ;
Vander Heydon, Y ;
Smeyers-Verbeke, J ;
Massart, DL ;
Crommen, J ;
Hubert, P ;
Marini, RD ;
Smeets, OSNM ;
Decristoforo, G ;
Van de Wauw, W ;
De Beer, J ;
Quaglia, MG ;
Stella, C ;
Veuthey, JL ;
Estevenon, O ;
Van Schepdael, A ;
Roets, E ;
Hoogmartens, J .
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2003, 481 (02) :261-272
[10]   Development of response models for optimising HPLC methods [J].
Dewé, W ;
Marini, RD ;
Chiap, P ;
Hubert, P ;
Crommen, J ;
Boulanger, B .
CHEMOMETRICS AND INTELLIGENT LABORATORY SYSTEMS, 2004, 74 (02) :263-268