The future(s) of digital agriculture and sustainable food systems: An analysis of high-level policy documents

被引:193
作者
Lajoie-O'Malley, Alana [1 ]
Bronson, Kelly [1 ]
van der Burg, Simone [2 ]
Klerkx, Laurens [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Sch Sociol & Anthropol Studies, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
[2] Wageningen Univ & Res, Wageningen Econ Res, Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Wageningen Univ, Knowledge Technol & Innovat Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
Digital transformation; Agriculture; 4.0; Directionality; Future visions; Normative orientation; Food security; Frame analysis; PRECISION AGRICULTURE; BIG DATA; EXPECTATIONS; TECHNOLOGY; CHALLENGES; SECURITY; CROPS; MEAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101183
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Ecosystem services delivery is influenced by food systems and vice versa. As the application of digital technologies in agriculture continues to expand, digital technologies might affect the delivery of ecosystem services in view of the sorts of food systems in which they are embedded. The direction food systems develop towards the future, and the role digital technologies play in this development, is influenced by imaginings, hopes and visions about what these technologies mean for future food systems. In this article, we investigate what roles are being imagined for these technologies by international actors with the ability to influence the future of food systems. We analyze outward-facing policy documents as well as conference proceedings on digital agriculture produced by the World Bank, the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Using qualitative textual analysis, we show that these organisations envision future food systems that prioritize maximizing food output through technology. We illustrate how this vision reflects a long-standing narrative about the role of technology in food systems innovation, which makes the controversial assumption that increases in food production lead to improvements in food security. Based on this finding, we suggest that evaluations of how digital agricultural technologies might affect the delivery of ecosystem services must begin by considering what visions of future food systems are take into account in science, technology development and policy making. Supporting similar research on high-level narratives surrounding agroecology and climate smart agriculture, we find that the dominant narrative in our dataset supports the status quo global, industrial agriculture and food system. This system continues to be criticized by many scholars for its environmental impacts. Based on our findings, we suggest that ecosystems service researchers could contribute substantially to the evaluation of environmental impacts of digital agriculture by analyzing the impact digital agriculture may have on the trade-offs between provisioning, regulatory, and cultural ecosystem services for several different food system futures. Such analyses can feed into processes of responsible innovation.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
Akhtman Yosef, 2017, [Geography, Environment, Sustainability, Geography, Environment, Sustainability], V10, P117
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Agriculture at a Crossroads
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, FARM MAN PRACT FOST
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, IPES FOOD UNIFORMITY
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, FUTURE VERY SHORT IN
[6]  
Bank W., 2017, ICT for Land Administration and Management. ICT in Agriculture (Updated Edition). Connecting Smallholders to Knowledge, Networks, and Institutions
[7]   Perceptions of the Fourth Agricultural Revolution: What's In, What's Out, and What Consequences are Anticipated? [J].
Barrett, Hannah ;
Rose, David Christian .
SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS, 2022, 62 (02) :162-189
[8]   Normative expectations in systems innovation [J].
Berkhout, Frans .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2006, 18 (3-4) :299-311
[9]   Precision agriculture and sustainability [J].
Bongiovanni R. ;
Lowenberg-Deboer J. .
Precision Agriculture, 2004, 5 (4) :359-387
[10]   The sociology of expectations in science and technology [J].
Borup, Mads ;
Brown, Nik ;
Konrad, Kornelia ;
Van Lente, Harro .
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2006, 18 (3-4) :285-298